Am J Perinatol 2015; 32(12): 1151-1157
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549396
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Indicators for Cervical Length in Twin Pregnancies

Authors

  • Frederik J. R. Hermans

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Ewoud Schuit

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    2   Julius Centre for Healthcare Research and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    3   Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • Sophie M. S. Liem

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Arianne C. Lim

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Johannes Duvekot

    4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Liesbeth C. J. Scheepers

    5   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Mallory M. Woiski

    6   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Maureen M. Franssen

    7   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Martijn A. Oudijk

    8   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp

    9   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Bas Nij Bijvanck

    10   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Dick J. Bekedam

    11   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Brent C. Opmeer

    12   Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Ben Willem J. Mol

    13   The Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Australia
Further Information

Publication History

05 November 2014

10 March 2015

Publication Date:
27 April 2015 (online)

Abstract

Objective Cervical length (CL) is associated with the risk of preterm birth (PTB) in multiple pregnancies. However, the position of CL within the pathophysiological pathway of PTB is unclear, and it is unknown which factors are predictive for CL. This study aims to investigate whether in twin pregnancies baseline maternal and obstetrical characteristics are potential indicators for CL, to improve insight in the pathophysiological pathway of PTB.

Study Design Secondary analysis of data on twin pregnancies and CL measurement between 16 and 22 weeks. A set of 10 potential indicators, known to be associated with an increased risk of PTB and/or which have a plausible mechanism resulting in a change of CL were selected. We used multivariable linear regression with backward selection to identify independent indicators for CL.

Results A total of 1,447 women with twin pregnancies were included. Mean CL was 43.7 (± 8.9) mm. In multivariable analysis, age (0.27 mm/y; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.39), use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) (−1.42 mm, 95% CI −2.6 to −0.25), and having delivered at term in a previous pregnancy (1.32 mm, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.39) were significantly associated with CL.

Conclusion This study shows that in twin pregnancies, age, use of ART and having delivered term in a previous pregnancy has an association with CL.

Authors' Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: F. J. R. H., B. W. J. M., E. S., B. C. O. Analyzed the data: E. S., F. J. R. H. Wrote the first draft of the article: F. J. R. H. Contributed to the writing of the article: F. J. R. H., E. S., B. C. O., B. W. J. M. Contributed and acquired data for the original trials, corrected article: S. M. S. L., A. C. L. HD, L. C. J. S., M. A. O., K. W. M. B., M. M. W., M. M. F., B. N. B., D. J. B. ICMJE criteria for authorship read and met: F. J. R. H., E. S., B. W. J. M., B. C. O., S. M. S. L., A. C. L, L. C. J. S., M. A. O., K. W. M. B., M. M. W., M. M. F., B. N. B., D. J. B. Agree with article results and conclusions: F. J. R. H, E. S., B. W. J. M., B. C. O., S. M. S. L., A. C. L HD, L. C. J. S., M. A. O., K. W. M. B., M. M. W., M. M. F., B. N. B., D. J. B.