Keywords
phytotherapy - pregnancy - medicinal plants - peumus boldus - foeniculum vulgare -
melissa officinalis
Palavras-chave
fitorerapia - gravidez - plantas medicinais - peumus boldus - foeniculum vulgare -
melissa officinalis
Introduction
Phytotherapy is defined as therapy based on the use of medicinal plants. The use of
these plants for treatment, cure, and prevention of diseases has mostly originated
from popular knowledge derived from ancient cultures.[1] This traditional knowledge of medicinal plants has been used by the pharmaceutical
industry, as there is enormous potential for the discovery of new drugs.[2]
According to the declaration of Alma-Ata in 1978, the World Health Organization (WHO)
recognizes that 80% of the population in developing countries - including Brazil -
use traditional practices in their basic healthcare, and 85% use medicinal plants,
or preparations from them. Accordingly, it is the intention of the WHO to encourage
the use of phytotherapy in basic healthcare.[3]
As the use of medicinal plants is based mostly on cultural heritage and not in research
on their effects, it is necessary to study how they are used by the populace. Knowledge
acquired from cultural heritage can lead to the inappropriate use of plants, with
adverse reactions in certain situations.[4]
Pregnant women may turn to this therapeutic option and require special attention.
Because many allopathic medicines are teratogenic and are contraindicated during pregnancy,
women may seek phytotherapy as alternative care.[5]
Medicinal plants have a globally important role during pregnancy, birth, and the postpartum
period. The use of plants before and after delivery and during lactation has been
documented in various cultures. However, the majority of research focuses on the knowledge
of these plants held by male folk healers, shamans, or others, neglecting the knowledge
possessed by women themselves.[6]
Nonetheless, studies indicate that some medicinal plants have toxic, teratogenic,
and abortive potential, because some active principles are able to cross the placental
barrier and reach the fetus, especially in the first trimester of pregnancy. Studies
performed with plants commonly used by the populace, such as the babosa (Aloe spp. L.), peppermint (Mentha piperita L), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.), and carqueja (Baccharistrimera (Less.) DC.), among others, are contraindicated in pregnant women.[7]
The Secretary of Health of the State of Rio de Janeiro published Resolution SES/RJ
No. 1757 on February 18, 2008, contraindicating various medicinal plants on the basis
of scientific studies that revealed the hazards they represent for the baby, both
during gestation and breastfeeding.
The objective of this study was to identify which medicinal plants are used by pregnant
women attending a Central Unit and four Basic Family Health Units in the city of Campina
Grande in the northeast of Brazil.
Methods
This cross-sectional study with a quantitative design was developed at the Elpídio
de Almeida Health Institute (ISEA) located in the central district, and in four Basic
Family Health Units (UBSF) of the Malvinas borough (Malvinas I, II, III, and IV),
in Campina Grande - PB, from February to April 2014.
A total of 178 pregnant women over 18 years of age participated in the research, in
any stage of pregnancy. They attended the ISEA and Basic Family Health Units of the
Malvinas borough, and gave informed consent, based on the guidelines and regulatory
standards for research involving human beings covered by the Resolution 196/96 of
the National Health Council.
The research team used a structured questionnaire to gather data.[5] The first part consisted of questions regarding demographic and socioeconomic status;
the second part included questions regarding general knowledge about medicinal plants;
the third part questioned specific knowledge, such as indications for use of certain
plants, and the method of preparation, among others. The plants cited by pregnant
women were compared with those in Resolution SES/RJ N° 1757, which contraindicated
the use of certain plants during pregnancy.
The researchers used SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) Version 17.0 to organize the database
and for statistical analysis. To verify the association between the variables studied
(use of plants as a dependent variable and social class as an independent variable),
we used Pearson's non-parametric Chi-square test, with a significance level of p< 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. The social classification of the population
was based on the economic criteria of the Brazilian Association of Research Companies
(Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa - ABEP).
The research project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital
UniversitárioAlcidesCarneiro, under protocol number 05552412.0.1001.5182 in 2013.
Results
Of the 178 pregnant women interviewed, 48.8% were 26 to 35 years old. Their ages ranged
from 18 to 42 years, with a mean age of 28. Among the participants, 65.7% were married
and 44.4% had completed an elementary school education. The predominant social class
was C2 (31.4%), with a family income of up to one minimum wage (51.1%). These data
are shown in [Table 1]. A total 47.2% were in the third trimester, 34.8% in the second, and 18% in the
first. Conventional houses were occupied by 84.8%, and 80.3% had access to basic sanitation.
Table 1
Socioeconomic profile of pregnant women attending the Elpídio de Almeida Health Institute
and the Basic Family Health Units of the neighborhood of Malvina in Campina Grande,
PB, Brazil, from February to April 2014
|
Characteristics
|
n
|
%
|
Characteristics
|
n
|
%
|
|
Marital status
|
|
|
Salary Range
|
|
|
|
Married
|
117
|
65.7
|
Up to 1 M.W.
|
91
|
51.1
|
|
Single
|
58
|
32.6
|
1 to 2 M.W.
|
64
|
36
|
|
Stable Relationship
|
2
|
1.1
|
2 to 3 M.W.
|
13
|
7.3
|
|
Divorced
|
1
|
0.6
|
More than 3 M.W.
|
10
|
5.6
|
|
Education
|
|
|
Social Class
|
|
|
|
High School complete
|
79
|
44.4
|
C2
|
56
|
31.4
|
|
Elementary incomplete
|
45
|
25.3
|
C1
|
55
|
30.8
|
|
Elementary Complete
|
37
|
20.8
|
D
|
44
|
24.7
|
|
Higher education complete
|
9
|
5.1
|
B2
|
17
|
9.5
|
|
Illiterate
|
3
|
1.7
|
E
|
3
|
1.6
|
|
High School Incomplete
|
3
|
1.7
|
B1
|
3
|
1.6
|
|
Higher education Incomplete
|
2
|
1.1
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Abbreviation: M.W., Minimum Wage.
During pregnancy, 30.9% reported the use of medicinal plants. The most used plants
were boldo (Peumusboldus Molina, by 35.4%), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare, by 24.2%), balm mint (Melissa officinalis L., by 22.5%), lemongrass (Cymbopogoncitratus (DC.) Stapf, by 6.4%), chamomile (Matricariachamomilla L., by 4.8%), carqueja (B. trimera, by 3.2%), and mint (M. piperita, by 3.2%). The data for each of these plants are summarized in [Table 2].
Table 2
List of plants most used by pregnant women in this study
|
Popular name
|
Scientific name
|
% of use
|
Indication
|
Adverse Effects
|
|
Boldo
|
Peumus boldus
|
35.4
|
Ability to protect the liver from toxins (hepatoprotective) due to the antioxidant
activity of its active ingredient,[15]
[16] boldine, which is also an agent potentially useful in the treatment of breast cancer.[17]
|
Teratogenic effects and abortifacient.[18]
|
|
Fennel
|
Foeniculum vulgare
|
24.2
|
Carminative, expectorant, spasmolytic, and diuretic action.[19]
|
Hydroalcoholic extracts caused effects on embryo implantation. Teratogenic potential
should be considered.[20] Abortifacient and galactogogue activity.[21]
|
|
Balm mint
|
Melissa officinalis
|
22.5
|
Reduces the duration and intensity of herpes outbreaks due to antiviral properties.[22] Sedative and anxiolytic effects.[23]
|
Abortifacient or teratogenic effects were not found in the literature consulted.
|
|
Lemon Grass
|
Cymbopogon citratus
|
6.4
|
Sedative, anti-inflammatory,[24] gastroprotective,[25] and antiallergic action.[26]
|
Relaxing property for the uterine musculature.[7]
|
|
Chamomile
|
Matricaria chamomilla
|
4.8
|
Moderate antimicrobial and antioxidant property and powerful anti-inflammatory activity.[27]
|
Has emmenagogue properties.[28]
|
|
Carqueja
|
Baccharis trimera
|
3.2
|
Cytoprotective of the gastric mucosa, capable of inhibiting ulcers.[29] Has relevant hyperglycemic effect.[30] Hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and cholagogue activity, related to the presence
of flavonoids.[31]
[32]
|
Induction of abortion due its uterotonic properties.[7]
[33]
|
|
Mint
|
Mentha piperita L.
|
3.2
|
It has shown promising activity in the treatment of intestinal spasms.[34]
|
Emmenagogue and teratogenic[7]; cytotoxic.[35]
|
There was no statistically significant correlation between social class and the use
of medicinal plants (p = 0.8). Of the women in the first trimester of pregnancy, 21.9% used medicinal plants,
as did 33.9% in the second trimester, and 32.1% in the third trimester.
The participants reported that knowledge on the use of medicinal plants had been acquired
from relatives (89.3%), friends (5.1%), books (2.2%), physicians (0.6%), and others
(1.7%). Relatives were the most responsible for the use of plants (81.8%), while health
professionals were responsible for only 2.6% of recommendations.
The plants were acquired mostly by purchase (67.5%) or were home-grown (19.5%), and
were used typically once a day (36.6%), boiled (54.6%), and used daily (55.5%). Among
interviewees who used medicinal plants to treat discomfort related to pregnancy (12.9%),
the most common symptoms were nausea (47%), pain in general (29.4%), and heartburn
(11.8%).
A total 73.6% said they believed that the use of certain medicinal plants can cause
adverse effect in pregnancy. Among those who said they perceived an undesirable effect
(3.6%), the most frequently mentioned were bleeding (1.8%), allergy (0.9%), and headache
(0.9%).
Discussion
Pregnancy is considered special, both scientifically and culturally. Thus, certain
practices based in both biomedical and popular knowledge are seen in pregnant women.[8] The use of medicinal plants is one example.
The concern about harm to the fetus leads some pregnant women to avoid allopathic
medicines and choose medicinal plants, which are perceived as natural and, therefore,
unable to cause harm. This raises concerns about the possible effects that their indiscriminate
use may cause.[9]
In the present study, 30.9% of the pregnant women used medicinal plants. In a study
by Macena et al,[10] 55.5% of pregnant women reported using medicinal plants.
We found no significant relationship (p = 0.8) between the use of plants and social class. Therefore, the indiscriminate
use of phytotherapy extends across all segments of the population, confirming studies
by Veiga Júnior,[11] which highlight indiscriminate self-medication with medicinal plants by all social
classes.
It is known that the first trimester of pregnancy is the period of embryonic differentiation.
At this stage, there is greater risk of congenital malformations due to exposure to
certain substances. In the present study, 21.9% of pregnant women used medicinal plants
in the first trimester, and their fetuses were, thus, more vulnerable to the risk
of malformations. During the second and third trimesters, changes due to exposure
to toxic substances may also occur, affecting growth and functional development.[12]
The majority of the pregnant women (84.8%) lived in conventional houses, which contributes
to the use of home-grown medicinal plants.
The method by which women learned about the plants was similar to that reported in
the study by Veiga Junior[11]: 90.1% of the interviewees obtained knowledge about such therapy from family members
or friends, and only 3.2% from a medical recommendation. These data confirm that the
origin of knowledge on medicinal plants is mostly of sociocultural origin, rather
than from prior studies on the effects of such treatment.[3] During pregnancy, women become more susceptible to advice and guidance from family
and friends on home remedies considered beneficial, thereby facilitating self-medication.[13]
Self-medication is a practice in which a patient gets or produces and uses a product,
be it a synthetic drug or a medicinal plant, without the guidance of a qualified professional.
When used by pregnant women, such medication presents a risk to the health of both
mother and fetus. One must emphasize the need for guidance by health professionals
(in this study, they were responsible for only 2.6% of phytotherapy recommendations),
grounded in the scientific study of medicinal plants.[12]
The most consumed plant species were boldo(P. boldus) (35.4%), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) (24.2%), balm mint (M. officinalis) (22.5%), lemongrass (C. citratus) (6.4%), chamomile (M. chamomilla) (4.8%), carqueja(B. trimera) (3.2%), and mint (Mentha piperita L.) (3.2%). In a study of the use of medicinal plants by pregnant women,[13] the most cited were balm mint (79.5%), boldo (41%), and anise (28%). In the study
performed by Veiga Júnior,[11] boldo was also the most cited plant (14.7%). In another study on the use of medicinal
plants by pregnant women, the most used were boldo (35.2%), lemongrass (21.5%), and
mint (15.6%).[10]
In a comparison of the plants most used by pregnant women with those contraindicated
during pregnancy, based on Resolution SES/RJ No. 175714, six of the seven most cited
plants are listed. Thus, there is a clear need to establish safety criteria for the
use of medicinal plants during pregnancy. These criteria should take into account
studies on the toxicity of phytotherapeutic products in pregnancy, including their
actions on the fetus, and the possible adverse effects on the mother.
