A Low-Cost High-Definition Video System for Microsurgical Hindlimb Replantation in Rats

Abstract

Background The surgical microscope is still essential for microsurgery, but several alternatives that show promising results are currently under development, such as endoscopes and laparoscopes with video systems; however, as yet, these have only been used for arterial anastomoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a low-cost video-assisted magnification system in replantation of the hindlimbs of rats.

Methods Thirty Wistar rats were randomly divided into two matched groups according to the magnification system used: the microscope group, with hindlimb replantation performed under a microscope with an image magnification of 40× and the video group, with the procedures performed under a video system composed of a high-definition camcorder, macrolenses, a 42-in television, and a digital HDMI cable. The camera was set to 50× magnification. We analyzed weight, arterial and venous caliber, total surgery time, arterial and venous anastomosis time, patency immediately and 7 days postoperatively, the number of stitches, and survival rate.

Results There were no significant differences between the groups in weight, arterial or venous caliber, or the number of stitches. Replantation under the video system took longer (p < 0.05). Patency rates were similar between groups, both immediately and 7 days postoperatively.

Conclusion It is possible to perform a hindlimb replantation in rats through video system magnification, with a satisfactory success rate comparable with that for procedures performed under surgical microscopes.

Keywords

microsurgery - replantation - surgical anastomosis

• References

• 1 Dohlman GF. Carl Olof Nylén and the birth of the otomicroscope and microsurgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1969; 90 (6) 813-817
• 2 Kleinert HE, Kasdan ML. Restoration of blood flow in upper extremity injuries. J Trauma 1963; 3: 461-476
• 3 Jain AK, Sasaki S, Engels B, Oldenbeuving NB, Poindexter BD, Vasconez LO. Microvascular surgery utilizing the endoscope as the sole source of visual assistance. Microsurgery 1998; 18 (2) 86-89
• 4 El-Shazly M, El-Sonbaty M, Kamel A, Zaki M, Frick A, Baumeister R. Endoscopic-assisted microsurgery: microsurgery in the new millennium? A comparative experimental study. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56 (1) 37-40
• 5 Southern SJ, Ramakrishnan V, Villofane O, Watt DA, Sharpe DT. Video microsurgery: early experience with an alternative operating magnification system. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (2) 63-69
• 6 Gorman PJ, Mackay DR, Kutz RH, Banducci DR, Haluck RS. Video microsurgery: evaluation of standard laparoscopic equipment for the practice of microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (4) 864-869
• 7 Blidisel A, Jiga L, Nistor A, Dornean V, Hoinoiu B, Ionac M. Video-assisted versus conventional microsurgical training: a comparative study in the rat model. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (5) 446-450
• 8 Barros RS, Brito MV, Moura GP , et al. Is it possible to do a microvascular anastomosis with an ordinary video camera? Experimental study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (8) 503-508
• 9 Liu J, Chen B, Ni Y, Zhan Y, Gao H. Application of a three-dimensional microsurgical video system for a rat femoral vessel anastomosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2014; 127 (2) 348-352
• 10 Wong AK, Davis GB, Nguyen TJ , et al. Assessment of three-dimensional high-definition visualization technology to perform microvascular anastomosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (7) 967-972
• 11 Yu D, Green C, Kasten SJ, Sackllah ME, Armstrong TJ. Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks. Appl Ergon 2016; 53 (Pt A): 281-289
• 12 Iijima Y, Ajiki T, Teratani T, Hoshino Y, Kobayashi E. Muscle is a target for preservation in a rat limb replantation model. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013; 1 (8) e70
• 13 Cunha MS, da Silva JC, Nakamoto HA, Fels KW, Ferreira MC. Estreptoquinase e oxigênio hiperbárico em congestão após reimplante de membro. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2007; 53 (1) 29-33
• 14 Lima DA, Galvão MS, Cardoso MM, Leal PR. Rotina de treinamento laboratorial em microcirurgia do Instituto Nacional do Câncer. Rev Bras Cir Plást 2012; 27 (1) 141-149 . 10.1590/S1983-51752012000100024
• 15 Kallás IE, Kallás AC, Kallás E. Anastomoses arteriais: passado, presente e futuro. Acta Cir Bras 1999; 14 (4) 221-227
• 16 Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (5) 1454-1460
• 17 Dijkstra JR, Meek MF, Robinson PH, Gramsbergen A. Methods to evaluate functional nerve recovery in adult rats: walking track analysis, video analysis and the withdrawal reflex. J Neurosci Methods 2000; 96 (2) 89-96