Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2012; 40(02): 122-128
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1623632
Kasuistik
Schattauer GmbH

Enterokutane Fistelbildung infolge Perforation des Kolons durch einen hölzernen Fremdkörper bei einem Hund

Enterocutaneous fistula formation in a dog as a result of colonic foreign body perforation
N. Wunderlin
1   Klinikum Veterinärmedizin, Klinik für Kleintiere, Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
M. Biel
1   Klinikum Veterinärmedizin, Klinik für Kleintiere, Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
C. Peppler
1   Klinikum Veterinärmedizin, Klinik für Kleintiere, Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
K. Amort
1   Klinikum Veterinärmedizin, Klinik für Kleintiere, Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
M. Kramer
1   Klinikum Veterinärmedizin, Klinik für Kleintiere, Chirurgie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 15 February 2011

Akzeptiert nach Revision: 05 May 2011

Publication Date:
06 January 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Eine 5 Jahre alte Pudelhündin wurde mit einer seit 3 Monaten bestehenden rezidivierenden Abszess- und Fistelbildung an der rechten Bauchwand vorgestellt. Durch eine röntgenologische und sonographische Untersuchung des Abdomens wurde die Diagnose einer enterokutanen Fistelbildung, verursacht durch einen den Dickdarm perforierenden hölzernen Fremdkörper, gestellt. Zusätzlich wies die Hündin eine Pyometra auf. Vierundzwanzig Stunden nach der chirurgischen Therapie (Laparotomie, Entfernung des Fremdkörpers,Verschluss der Perforationsstelle am Kolon, Bauchhöhlenlavage und -drainage, Fistelrevision) wurde der Patient aufgrund einer Sepsis und eines beginnenden Multiorganversagens euthanasiert.

Summary

A 5-year-old female Poodle was presented with a 3-month history of recurrent abscess and fistula formation on the right abdominal wall. Radiographic and ultrasonographic examinations demonstrated an enterocutaneous fistula formation secondary to foreign body perforation of the colon.Additionally, the diagnosis of a pyometra was made.Twenty-four hours after surgical therapy (ventral midline coeliotomy, foreign body removal, closure of the colon perforation, abdominal lavage and drainage, revision of the fistula) the patient was euthanized due to sepsis and incipient multiorgan dysfunction.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Basher AW, Fowler JD. Conservative versus surgical management of gastrointestinal linear foreign bodies in the cat. Vet Surg 1987; 16 (02) 135-138.
  • 2 Batt RM, Rutgers C. Bacteria and intestinal disease in dogs. GDBA Technical Review no 11 1997. UK.
  • 3 Boysen SR, Tidwell AS, Penninck DG. Ultrasonographic findings in dogs and cats with gastrointestinal perforation. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003; 44: 556-564.
  • 4 Brennan SF, Connery N, Tobin E, Mooney CT, Jones BR. Gastrocutaneous fistula as a result of migration of a foreign body in a dog. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 304-306.
  • 5 Bristol DG. Enterocutaneous fistulae in horses: 18 cases (1964–1992). Vet Surg 1994; 23: 167-171.
  • 6 Brown DC. Intestinal Luminal Obstruction: Foreign Bodies and Masses. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002: 654-655.
  • 7 Byeon Y, Park S, Choi M, Kweon O, Kim WH. Enterocutanous fistula as a result of chronic bite wound repair in a dog. J Vet Med Sci 2008; 70 (11) 1281-1283.
  • 8 Capak D, Simpraga M, Maticic D, Bali R, Janoska B. Incidence of foreignbody-induced ileus in dogs. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2001; 114 (7–8): 290-296.
  • 9 Chandler JC, Kudnig ST, Monnet E. Use of laparoscopic-assisted jejunostomy for fecal diversion in the management of a rectocutaneous fistula in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226 (05) 746-751.
  • 10 Draus Jr JM, Huss SA, Harty NJ, Cheadle WG, Larson GM. Enterocutaneous fistula: are treatments improving?. Surgery 2006; 140 (04) 570-576.
  • 11 Flom LL, Ellis GL. Radiologic evaluation of foreign bodies. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992; 10 (01) 163-177.
  • 12 Frank JD, Stanley BJ. Enterocutaneous fistula in a dog secondary to an intraperitoneal gauze foreign body. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2009; 45 (02) 84-88.
  • 13 Fritsch R, Gerwing M. Sonographie bei Hund und Katze. Stuttgart: Enke; 1993: 188.
  • 14 Goh BKP, Tan YM, Lin SE, Chow PK, Cheah FK, Ooi LL, Wong WK. CT in the preoperative diagnosis of fish bone perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (03) 710-714.
  • 15 Greenfield CL, Walshaw R. Open peritoneal drainage for treatment of contaminated peritoneal cavity and septic peritonitis in dogs and cats: 24 cases (1980–1986). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 191 (01) 100-105.
  • 16 Guilford WG, Strombeck DR. Intestinal obstruction, pseudoobstruction, and foreign bodies. In: Strombeck’s Small Animal Gastroenterology. Guilford WG, Center SA, Strombeck D, Williams DA, Meyer DJ. eds. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996: 487-502.
  • 17 Hauptman JG, Walshaw R, Olivier NB. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic criteria for sepsis in dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 393-397.
  • 18 Hollington P, Mawdsley J, Lim W, Gabe SM, Forbes A, Windsor AJ. An 11-year experience of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1646-1651.
  • 19 Horiuchi A, Watanabe Y, Doi T, Sato K, Yukumi S, Yoshida M, Yamamoto Y, Sugishita H, Kawachi K. Evaluation of prognostic factors and scoring system in colonic perforation. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13 (23) 3228-3231.
  • 20 Hosgood G, Salisbury SK. Generalized peritonitis in dogs: 50 cases (1975–1986). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 193 (11) 1448-1450.
  • 21 Jackson AH, Degner DA. Cutaneopulmonary fistula in a dog caused by migration of a toothpick. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2002; 38: 545-547.
  • 22 Johnson-Neitman JL, Bahr RJ, Broaddus KD. Fistula formation secondary to a nylon cable band in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47 (04) 355-357.
  • 23 Johnson D, Hamer DB. Perforation of the transverse colon as a result of minor blunt abdominal trauma. Injury 1997; 28 (5–6): 421-423.
  • 24 Kirby B. Fistulous tracks. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. eds. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002: 440-441.
  • 25 Kramer M, Gerwing M. Die sonographische Diagnostik von Fremdkörpern bei Hund und Katze. Tierärztl Prax 1996; 24 (K): 378-384.
  • 26 Lamb CR, White RN, McEvoy FT. Sinography in the investigation of draining tracts in small animals: retrospective review of 25 cases. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 129-134.
  • 27 Lanz OI, Ellison GW, Bellah JR, Weichman G, VanGilder J. Surgical treatment of septic peritonitis without abdominal drainage in 28 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37 (01) 87-92.
  • 28 Laroche M, Harding G. Primary and secondary peritonitis: An update. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1998; 17 (08) 542-550.
  • 29 Lawson AK, Seshadri R. Two cases of planned relaparotomy for severe peritonitis secondary to gastrointestinal pathology. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2007; 43 (02) 117-121.
  • 30 Maarschalkerweed RJ, Kirpensteijn J. Abdominal drainage in ten dogs with septic peritonitis. Vet Q 1995; 17 (01) 10.
  • 31 Maleki M, Evans WE. Foreign-body perforation of the intestinal tract: report of 12 cases and review of the literature. Arch Surg 1970; 101: 474-477.
  • 32 Ober CP, Jones JC, Moon MLarson, Lanz OI, Werre R. Comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of acute wooden foreign bodies in the canine manus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008; 49 (05) 411-418.
  • 33 Plumb DC. Plumb’s Veterinary Drug Handbook. White Bear Lake (USA): PharmaVet Publishing; 2005. 431–433, 443-446.
  • 34 Rijkenhuizen AB, Sickmann HG. Incarcerated umbilical hernia with enterocutaneous fistula in a calf. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1995; 120: 8-10.
  • 35 Rogers CL, Gibson C, Mitchell SL, Keating JH, Rozanski EA. Disseminated candidiasis secondary to fungal and bacterial peritonitis in a young dog. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2009; 19 (02) 193-198.
  • 36 Smith FO. Pyometra. In: Kirk’s current veterinary therapy XIV. Bonagura JD, Twedt DC. eds. St. Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2009: 1008-1009.
  • 37 Staatz AJ, Monnet E, Seim HBIII. Open peritoneal drainage versus primary closure for the treatment of septic peritonitis in dogs and cats: 42 cases (1993–1999). Vet Surg 2002; 31: 174-180.
  • 38 Staudte KL, Hopper BJ, Gibson NR, Read RA. Use of ultrasonography to facilitate surgical removal of non-enteric foreign bodies in 17 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 395-400.
  • 39 Steuber S, Kroker R. Antiprotozoika. In: Pharmakotherapie bei Haus- und Nutztieren. Löscher W, Ungemach FR, Kroker R. Hrsg. Berlin: Parey; 2003: 363-385.
  • 40 Strauss JE, Balthazar EJ, Naidich DP. Jejunal perforation by a toothpick: CT demonstration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 09: 812-814.
  • 41 Swann H, Hughes D. Diagnosis and management of peritonitis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30: 603-614.
  • 42 Thiel C, Frese H, Tacke S, Herde K, Kramer M. Verletzungen durch hölzerne Fremdkörper beim Hund. Tierärztl Prax 2006; 34 (K): 157-167.
  • 43 Tobias KM. Rectal perforation, rectocutaneous fistula formation, and enterocutaneous fistula formation after pelvic trauma in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205 (09) 1292-1296.
  • 44 Toombs JP, Caywood DD, Lipowitz AJ, Stevens JB. Colonic perforation following neurosurgical procedures and corticosteroid therapy in four dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1980; 177 (01) 68-72.
  • 45 Tyrrell D, Beck C. Survey of the use of radiography vs. ultrasonography in the investigation of gastrointestinal foreign bodies in small animals. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47 (04) 404-408.
  • 46 Walshaw R. The small intestine. In: General Small Animal Surgery. Gourley IM, Vasseur PB. eds. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1985: 343-384.
  • 47 Wylie KB, Hosgood G. Mortality and morbidity of small and large intestinal surgery in dogs and cats: 74 cases (1980–1992). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1994; 30: 469-474.