Choice of Trial of Labor after Cesarean and Association with Likelihood of Success

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether the predicted chance of success is associated with the choice to undergo trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC).

Study Design Retrospective cohort study of women with a single prior nonelective cesarean delivering a term singleton in 2012 at a tertiary care hospital. A vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) score (likelihood of success) was estimated for each patient. The primary outcome was percentage of women choosing TOLAC among women with favorable (> 70% likelihood) and unfavorable VBAC scores. Other factors such as desired sterilization, provider type, and spontaneous labor were included in the analysis.

Results In 2012, 434 women were eligible: 73 with VBAC score >70%, and 361 with score ≤70%. Of those with score >70%, 63% chose TOLAC, compared with 21% with score ≤70% (p < 0.01). In a multivariable analysis, spontaneous labor onset was highly associated with choosing TOLAC: adjusted odds ratio 26.7 (95% confidence interval 13.86–51.29). The choice of TOLAC was also positively associated with resident provider and desired fertility.

Conclusion Almost four in ten women with a history of nonelective primary cesarean and a very high predicted likelihood of VBAC choose elective repeat cesarean. Spontaneous labor was strongly associated with the choice to undergo TOLAC.

Keywords

elective repeat cesarean delivery - trial of labor after cesarean - vaginal birth after cesarean - VBAC calculator

• References

• 1 National Center for Health Statistics. User Guide to the 2013 Natality Public Use File. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Annual product 2014. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/VitalStatsOnline.htm . Accessed January 15, 2018
• 2 Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C. , et al. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010; 191: 1-397
• 3 Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB. , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The change in the VBAC rate: an epidemiological analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011; 25 (01) 37-43
• 4 Yeh J, Wactawski-Wende J, Shelton JA, Reschke J. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194 (01) 144
• 5 McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes Jr WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996; 335 (10) 689-695
• 6 Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ. , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (25) 2581-2589
• 7 Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB. , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (04) 806-812
• 8 Costantine MM, Fox K, Byers BD. , et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (05) 1029-1033
• 9 Chaillet N, Bujold E, Dubé E, Grobman WA. Validation of a prediction model for predicting the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labour in Quebec. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012; 34 (09) 820-825
• 10 Yokoi A, Ishikawa K, Miyazaki K, Yoshida K, Furuhashi M, Tamakoshi K. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women. Int J Med Sci 2012; 9 (06) 488-491
• 11 Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2014; 63 (06) 1-16
• 12 Knight HE, Gurol-Urganci I, van der Meulen JH. , et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG 2014; 121 (02) 183-192
• 13 Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S. How do good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who undergo elective repeat cesarean differ from those who choose TOLAC?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208 (06) 458.e1-458.e6
• 14 DeFranco EA, Rampersad R, Atkins KL. , et al. Do vaginal birth after cesarean outcomes differ based on hospital setting?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (04) 400.e1-400.e6
• 15 Nijagal MA, Kuppermann M, Nakagawa S, Cheng Y. Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (04) 491.e1-491.e8
• 16 Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ. , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (06) 1226-1232