Download PDF
Digestive Disease Interventions 2018; 02(02): 125-130
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655772
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA

Role of Image-Guided Percutaneous Drainage in Pancreatic Collections

Katayoun Samadi
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Ronald S. Arellano
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 April 2018

05 April 2018

Publication Date:
05 June 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is one of the major gastrointestinal conditions that lead to around 300,000 hospital admissions per year in the United States. While mild inflammation of the pancreas is often managed conservatively, progression of the disease process to necrosis significantly increases the overall morbidity and mortality and often requires surgical or other interventional techniques for management. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of percutaneous drainage for the management of complicated pancreatitis.

Keywords

pancreatitis - Atlanta classification - walled-off necrosis
 

  • References

  • 1 Vege SS, Yadav D, Chari ST. Pancreatitis. In: Talley NJ, Locke GR, Saito YA. , eds. GI Epidemiology. 1st ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J. , et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012; 143 (05) 1179-87.e1 , 3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Zaheer A, Singh VK, Qureshi RO, Fishman EK. The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines. Abdom Imaging 2013; 38 (01) 125-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Busireddy KK, AlObaidy M, Ramalho M. , et al. Pancreatitis-imaging approach. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2014; 5 (03) 252-270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS. ; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108 (09) 1400-1415 , 1416
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Quinlan JD. Acute pancreatitis. Am Fam Physician 2014; 90 (09) 632-639
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Bradley III EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993; 128 (05) 586-590
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C. , et al; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62 (01) 102-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Petrov MS, Shanbhag S, Chakraborty M, Phillips AR, Windsor JA. Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2010; 139 (03) 813-820
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Zerem E, Imamović G, Sušić A, Haračić B. Step-up approach to infected necrotising pancreatitis: a 20-year experience of percutaneous drainage in a single centre. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43 (06) 478-483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Connor S, Alexakis N, Raraty MG. , et al. Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy. Surgery 2005; 137 (05) 499-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Carlin AM, Zeni TM, English WJ. , et al; Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2013; 257 (05) 791-797
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E. Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 1994; 193 (02) 297-306
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Zhao K, Adam SZ, Keswani RN, Horowitz JM, Miller FH. Acute pancreatitis: revised Atlanta classification and the role of cross-sectional imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205 (01) W32-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Spanier BW, Nio Y, van der Hulst RW, Tuynman HA, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ. Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch Observational Multicenter Study. Pancreatology 2010; 10 (2–3): 222-228
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kumar N, Conwell DL, Thompson CC. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy versus step-up approach for walled-off pancreatic necrosis: comparison of clinical outcome and health care utilization. Pancreas 2014; 43 (08) 1334-1339
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ross AS, Irani S, Gan SI. , et al. Dual-modality drainage of infected and symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis: long-term clinical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79 (06) 929-935
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Loveday BP, Petrov MS, Connor S. , et al; Pancreas Network of New Zealand. A comprehensive classification of invasive procedures for treating the local complications of acute pancreatitis based on visualization, route, and purpose. Pancreatology 2011; 11 (04) 406-413
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13 (4, Suppl 2): e1-e15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 van Grinsven J, Timmerman P, van Lienden KP. , et al; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Proactive versus standard percutaneous catheter drainage for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 2017; 46 (04) 518-523
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ, Traverso LW, Sinanan M. Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170 (04) 969-975
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Navalho M, Pires F, Duarte A, Gonçalves A, Alexandrino P, Távora I. Percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic fluid collections in critically ill patients: correlation with C-reactive protein values. Clin Imaging 2006; 30 (02) 114-119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB. , et al; Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. Minimally invasive ‘step-up approach’ versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868]. BMC Surg 2006; 6: 6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Banks PA, Freeman ML. ; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101 (10) 2379-2400
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wroński M, Cebulski W, Witkowski B. , et al. Comparison between minimally invasive and open surgical treatment in necrotizing pancreatitis. J Surg Res 2017; 210: 22-31
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Horvath K, Freeny P, Escallon J. , et al. Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study. Arch Surg 2010; 145 (09) 817-825
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Babu RY, Gupta R, Kang M, Bhasin DK, Rana SS, Singh R. Predictors of surgery in patients with severe acute pancreatitis managed by the step-up approach. Ann Surg 2013; 257 (04) 737-750
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Hollemans RA, Bollen TL, van Brunschot S. , et al; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Predicting success of catheter drainage in infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2016; 263 (04) 787-792
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ahmad HA, Samarasam I, Hamdorf JM. Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy. Pancreatology 2011; 11 (01) 52-56
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Isenmann R, Rau B, Beger HG. Bacterial infection and extent of necrosis are determinants of organ failure in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1999; 86 (08) 1020-1024
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Garg PK, Madan K, Pande GK. , et al. Association of extent and infection of pancreatic necrosis with organ failure and death in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3 (02) 159-166
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 van Baal MC, van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Gooszen HG. ; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Systematic review of percutaneous catheter drainage as primary treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2011; 98 (01) 18-27
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ. , et al; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (16) 1491-1502
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Liu WH, Wang T, Yan HT. , et al. Predictors of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) after abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) in patients with moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis along with fluid collections. PLoS One 2015; 10 (02) e0115348
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Echenique AM, Sleeman D, Yrizarry J. , et al. Percutaneous catheter-directed debridement of infected pancreatic necrosis: results in 20 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9 (04) 565-571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Cheung MT, Ho CN, Siu KW, Kwok PC. Percutaneous drainage and necrosectomy in the management of pancreatic necrosis. ANZ J Surg 2005; 75 (04) 204-207
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Paye F, Rotman N, Radier C, Nouira R, Fagniez PL. Percutaneous aspiration for bacteriological studies in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1998; 85 (06) 755-759
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Sugimoto M, Sonntag DP, Flint GS. , et al. Better outcomes if percutaneous drainage is used early and proactively in the course of necrotizing pancreatitis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (03) 418-425
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Keane MG, Sze SF, Cieplik N. , et al. Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a 14-year experience from a tertiary hepatobiliary centre. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (09) 3730-3740
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2013; 145 (03) 583-90.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Beebe DS, Bubrick MP, Onstad GR, Hitchcock CR. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984; 159 (06) 562-564
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Adams DB, Anderson MC. Percutaneous catheter drainage compared with internal drainage in the management of pancreatic pseudocyst. Ann Surg 1992; 215 (06) 571-576 , discussion 576–578
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Gluck M, Ross A, Irani S. , et al. Dual modality drainage for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitalization, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16 (02) 248-256 , discussion 256–257
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Ross A, Gluck M, Irani S. , et al. Combined endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71 (01) 79-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W. , et al. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut 2009; 58 (09) 1260-1266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Gumaste VV, Aron J. Pseudocyst management: endoscopic drainage and other emerging techniques. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44 (05) 326-331
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Lerch MM, Stier A, Wahnschaffe U, Mayerle J. Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection?. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106 (38) 614-621
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Gouyon B, Lévy P, Ruszniewski P. , et al. Predictive factors in the outcome of pseudocysts complicating alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Gut 1997; 41 (06) 821-825
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Zerem E, Hauser G, Loga-Zec S, Kunosić S, Jovanović P, Crnkić D. Minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21 (22) 6850-6860
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Tong Z, Shen X, Ke L. , et al. The effect of a novel minimally invasive strategy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (11) 4603-4616
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Guo Q, Li A, Hu W. Predictive factors for successful ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage in necrotizing pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (07) 2929-2934
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13 (03) 141-148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Aghdassi A, Mayerle J, Kraft M, Sielenkämper AW, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM. Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2008; 36 (02) 105-112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Spivak H, Galloway JR, Amerson JR. , et al. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186 (05) 507-511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar