Variation of Grip Strength and Wrist Range of Motion with Forearm Rotation in Healthy Young Volunteers Aged 23 to 30

Abstract

Background Grip strength and wrist range of motion (ROM) are important metrics used to evaluate hand rehabilitation and outcomes of wrist interventions. Published normative data on these metrics do not recognize the contribution of forearm rotation. This study aims to identify and quantify variations in grip strength and wrist ROM with forearm rotation in healthy young individuals.

Materials and Methods Wrist ROM and grip strength were measured in 30 healthy volunteers aged 23 to 30. Participant demographics, grip strength, and wrist ROM (wrist flexion and extension, ulnar and radial deviation) at three forearm positions (full supination, neutral, and full pronation) were measured using a digital dynamometer and standard goniometers. Data analysis was conducted using a one-way repeated measure ANOVA. Forearm position values were compared using post hoc analysis.

Results Grip strength in males was greatest in neutral position (males: nondominant 51.4 kg, dominant 56.1 kg) followed by supination (males: nondominant 46.6 kg, dominant 51.7 kg) and weakest in pronation (males: nondominant 40.1 kg, dominant 42.9 kg). Grip strength in females was similar between supination (nondominant: 26.1 kg, dominant: 28.5 kg) and neutral (nondominant: 27.4 kg, dominant: 29.1 kg) positions, but both were greater than in pronation (nondominant: 22.3 kg, dominant: 24.1 kg). Wrist flexion in males was significantly reduced in supination compared with neutral and pronated positions (nondominant: supination 63.1°, neutral 72.6°, pronation 73.3°; dominant: supination 62.4°, neutral 70.2°, pronation 70.3°), whereas not significant wrist flexion in females was also weaker in supination (supination 74.4°, neutral 79.9°). Wrist extension in males was greater in pronation (supination 64.6°, pronation 69.5°) whereas females showed no significant difference in any of the forearm positions. Ulnar deviation in males did not differ with forearm position, but females demonstrated greater ulnar deviation in supination on the nondominant hand (supination 44.6°, pronation 33.2°). Whereas there was no difference in radial deviation with forearm position in females, it was markedly greater in pronation versus supination on both sides in males (nondominant: supination 16.3°, pronation 24.6°; dominant: supination 15.4°, pronation 23.9°).

Conclusion This study characterizes variations in grip strength and wrist ROM in three forearm positions in healthy young individuals. All measurements differed with forearm rotation and were not influenced by hand dominance. These results suggest that wrist ROM and grip strength should be evaluated in different positions of forearm rotation, rather than a fixed position. This has functional implications particularly in patients involved with specialized activities such as sports, instrument-playing, or work-related activities.

Keywords

wrist motion - grip strength - functional range - rehabilitation

• References

• 1 Gûnal I, Köse N, Erdogan O, Göktürk E, Seber S. Normal range of motion of the joints of the upper extremity in male subjects, with special reference to side. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (09) 1401-1404
• 2 Klum M, Wolf MB, Hahn P, Leclère FM, Bruckner T, Unglaub F. Normative data on wrist function. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (10) 2050-2060
• 3 Neese RM, Konz S, Reams M. Ranges of motion in the human wrist. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 1989
• 4 Marshall MM, Mozrall JR, Shealy JE. The effects of complex wrist and forearm posture on wrist range of motion. Hum Factors 1999; 41 (02) 205-213
• 5 Nelson DL, Mitchell MA, Groszewski PG, Pennick SL, Manske PR. Wrist range of motion in activities of daily living. In: Advances in the Biomechanics of the Hand and Wrist. New York, NY: Springer; 1994: 329-334
• 6 Ryu JY, Cooney III WP, Askew LJ, An KN, Chao EY. Functional ranges of motion of the wrist joint. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (03) 409-419
• 7 MacDermid J, Solomon G, Valdes KE. Grip Strength: Clinical Assessment Recommendations. 3rd ed.. Mount Laurel, NJ: American Society of Hand Therapists; 2015
• 8 Firrell JC, Crain GM. Which setting of the dynamometer provides maximal grip strength?. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (03) 397-401
• 9 Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 1966; 184 (01) 170-192
• 10 Massy-Westropp NM, Gill TK, Taylor AW, Bohannon RW, Hill CL. Hand grip strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4: 127
• 11 Wilmore JH. The application of science to sport: physiological profiles of male and female athletes. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1979; 4 (02) 103-115
• 12 Simoneau JA, Lortie G, Boulay MR, Marcotte M, Thibault MC, Bouchard C. Human skeletal muscle fiber type alteration with high-intensity intermittent training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1985; 54 (03) 250-253
• 13 Nemethi CE. Normal wrist motions. Ind Med Surg 1953; 22 (05) 230
• 14 Allander E, Björnsson OJ, Olafsson O, Sigfússon N, Thorsteinsson J. Normal range of joint movements in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special reference to side: a comparison between two populations. Int J Epidemiol 1974; 3 (03) 253-261
• 15 Mogk JP, Keir PJ. The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping. Ergonomics 2003; 46 (09) 956-975
• 16 Watson HK, Weinzweig J. The Wrist. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001
• 17 Case-Smith J. Outcomes in hand rehabilitation using occupational therapy services. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57 (05) 499-506
• 18 Carter TI, Pansy B, Wolff AL. et al. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (08) 1422-1428