CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55(02): 226-231
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700824
Artigo Original
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Radiographic Analysis of Intra-articular Fractures of the Calcaneus in patients undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment in a Tertiary Hospital[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
Glauter Carlos Félix
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
,
Marcelo Silveira Matias
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
,
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
,
Nelson Silveira Matias
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
,
Clodoaldo José Duarte de Sousa
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
,
Luiz Holanda Pinto Neto
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Endereço para correspondência

Réjelos Charles Aguiar Lira, MD
Instituto Dr José Frota
Rua Barão do Rio Branco, 1816, Centro, Fortaleza, CE, 60025-061
Brasil   

Publication History

16 April 2018

18 December 2018

Publication Date:
19 December 2019 (online)

 

Abstract

Objective This paper aims to evaluate patients with articular calcaneal fractures treated with a minimally invasive surgical technique between January 2015 and August 2016, with emphasis on radiographic results.

Methods Retrospective study of 49 patients with 64 displaced calcaneal fractures treated with open reduction by minimal lateral access to the subtalar joint and minimal fixation. Pre- and postoperative radiographic studies were performed to measure the angles of Böhler and Gissane.

Results The average angle of Böhler before surgery was 2.5°, increasing to an average value of 25.3° after the minimally invasive surgical treatment. The average angle of Gissane before surgery was 136.3°, decreasing to an average value of 114.3° after the procedure.

Conclusion The minimally invasive surgical technique improves the radiographic parameters of intra-articular calcaneal fractures, with appropriate anatomical restoration of anatomical shape.


#

Introduction

Calcaneal fractures are the most common tarsal bones injuries,[1] [2] representing 2% of all fractures. They are displaced and intra-articular in 60 to 75% of the cases, in which surgical correction is indicated.[3] [4] [5]

Calcaneal fractures often result in disability and prolonged absence from work activities; in addition, they are more prevalent in the economically active population.[3] [4] [6] [7]

Despite the introduction of modern surgical techniques, unsatisfactory results are common.[8] [9] Over the past 20 years, many authors have preferred the extended lateral access route and internal fixation with plate and screws.[10] [11] In such cases, up to 43.5% of the patients evolved with soft tissue complications, requiring secondary procedures for synthesis material removal.[12] Other authors have published results from less invasive methods, with economical access routes and minimal fixation using wires and screws, and reported lower complication rates.[8]

The angles of Böhler and Gissane indicate changes in the joint facet and qualify fracture resolution[3] [5] ([Figures 1] and [2]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Schematic representation of Bohler angle.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Schematic representation of Gissane angle.

This study aims to evaluate the radiographic profile of intra-articular calcaneal fractures by assessing radiographically the angles of Böhler and Gissane, before and after surgical treatment with a minimally invasive technique.


#

Materials and Methods

This is a descriptive, retrospective study including patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated at a referral trauma hospital in the state of Ceará, Brazil, from January 2015 to August 2016. During this period, 146 patients with calcaneal fracture were seen. Patients under 18 years-old, undergoing conservative treatment, or conventional therapy (‘L’ lateral access route and internal fixation with plate and screws), with incomplete medical records, lost to follow-up, or who died during follow-up were excluded from the study. Thus, 49 patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical treatment were selected for this series; since 15 subjects had bilateral calcaneal fractures, a total of 64 injuries were analyzed (N = 64).

Data were collected from medical records using a structured script including age, gender, and trauma mechanism. In addition, the angles of Böhler and Gissane were measured in pre- and postoperative radiographs with a standardized goniometer. Normal values were defined as 20 to 40° and 100 to 120° for the Böhler and Gissane angles, respectively.

Surgical Technique

The surgical procedure is performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia and positioned in lateral decubitus. Asepsis and antisepsis are performed, followed by sterile fields placement. Next, a minimal lateral surgical access to the subtalar joint, guided by a line between the inferior aspect of the lateral malleolus and the fourth toe, is made. Dissecting through anatomical planes, the subtalar joint is approached for open reduction of the fracture using levers or bone hooks. Then, an internal fixation with 3.5 mm/4.5 mm cannulated screws or percutaneous Kirschner wires is performed under radioscopy with image intensifier.


#

Data Analysis

Data were compiled and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Mean, median, and standard deviation values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were determined for categorical variables. A t-test for paired samples compared the angles of Böhler and Gissane. A confidence interval of 95% and a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


#

Ethical Issues

The study was duly authorized by the research Ethics committee under protocol No. 1.710.233 from September 2, 2016.


#
#

Results

In total, 49 patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures were analyzed. Since there were 15 cases of bilateral fractures (30.61%), a total of 64 fractures were analyzed. Six of these (9.37%) were open fractures. There was a predominance of male patients (89.79%), with a 9:1 ratio to females ([Figure 3]). The mean age of the patients was 39 years (ranging from 18–70 years-old). Thirty-six (71,42%) patients reported falls as trauma mechanisms, with an average fall height of approximately 4.5 meters. In addition, 10 (20.4%) patients reported traffic accidents and 3 (6.12%) reported firearm injuries as trauma mechanisms ([Figure 4]). Sixteen (32.65%) of the 49 patients reported work-related accidents. The right foot was affected in 48% cases and the left foot was injured in 52% subjects.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Patients with calcaneal fractures according to gender. Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 2017.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Calcaneal fractures according to trauma mechanism. Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 2017. GSW, gunshot wound.

All fractures were analyzed through lateral calcaneal radiographs for evaluating the angle of Böhler (whose normal reference value ranges from 20–40°) and the angle of Gissane (whose normal reference value ranges from 100–120°) measurements. The mean angle of Böhler before surgery was 2.5° (median, 0°), increasing to an average value of 25.3° (median, 24°) after minimally invasive surgical treatment (p < 0.001). The mean angle of Gissane before surgery was 136.3° (median, 140°), decreasing to an average value of 114.3° (median, 116°) in the postoperative period (p < 0.001) ([Tables 1] and [2]).

Table 1

Patient

Foot

Age

Gender

Trauma mechanism

Height (m)

Work-related accident

Fracture

Preoperative Böhler angle (degrees)

Postoperative Böhler angle (degrees)

Preoperative Gissane angle (degrees)

Postoperative Gissane angle (degrees)

1

R

29

m

Traffic accident

No

Closed

-10

26

120

120

1[*]

L

Closed

2

28

118

116

2

L

35

m

Fall

6

No

Closed

22

24

146

140

2[*]

R

Closed

10

20

140

129

3

L

52

m

Fall

4

No

Closed

-10

5

116

114

4

R

35

m

Fall

2.5

No

Closed

-5

26

150

118

4[*]

L

Closed

8

22

142

126

5

R

16

m

Fall

5

No

Closed

10

46

146

116

5[*]

L

Closed

20

35

138

122

6

R

45

m

Fall

4

No

Closed

0

20

146

124

7

R

36

m

Fall

4

Yes

Closed

0

26

140

110

7[*]

L

Closed

5

20

145

112

8

R

40

m

Fall

3

Yes

Closed

0

18

144

100

9

L

26

m

Fall

16

Yes

Closed

0

22

152

124

10

R

55

m

Fall

3

Yes

Closed

0

20

140

112

11

L

65

m

Fall

4

No

Closed

-12

22

140

108

11[*]

R

Closed

4

30

138

118

12

L

31

m

Fall

5

Yes

Closed

0

24

150

114

13

L

47

m

Fall

7

Yes

Closed

2

28

142

124

13[*]

R

Closed

5

24

132

115

14

L

54

m

Fall

2

Yes

Closed

12

20

56

110

15

R

19

m

Fall

14

No

Closed

0

22

146

122

15[*]

L

Closed

10

29

132

115

16

R

30

m

Traffic accident

No

Open

0

24

148

110

17

R

40

m

Fall

3

Yes

Closed

10

28

128

106

18

R

35

m

Fall

3.5

Yes

Closed

12

38

140

135

18[*]

L

No

Closed

14

54

138

115

19

R

30

m

Traffic accident

No

Closed

0

24

100

110

20

R

52

m

Fall

2

No

Closed

16

24

138

104

21

R

58

m

Fall

15

Yes

Closed

8

26

136

124

21[*]

L

Closed

10

29

140

126

22

R

35

f

Traffic accident

No

Open

-6

20

128

114

23

R

45

m

Gunshot wound

No

Open

-12

2

120

118

24

L

44

m

Fall

3

No

Closed

-10

12

130

120

25

R

26

m

Fall

2

Yes

Closed

30

30

158

118

26

R

33

m

Fall

2

Yes

Closed

-10

30

140

124

27

L

37

m

Fall

3

Yes

Closed

-12

28

44

108

28

L

48

f

Gunshot wound

No

Open

6

20

128

114

29

L

35

m

Fall

2

Yes

Closed

-8

34

138

110

30

R

57

m

Fall

3

No

Closed

12

22

156

120

31

L

37

m

Fall

3

No

Closed

0

26

158

106

32

L

44

m

Fall

4

Yes

Closed

-2

26

138

112

32[*]

R

Closed

5

24

132

114

33

L

37

f

Traffic accident

No

Closed

0

22

148

122

34

R

13

m

Fall

3

No

Closed

-2

20

156

130

35

R

34

m

Fall

4

No

Closed

4

22

148

116

36

R

32

m

Traffic accident

No

Closed

6

24

142

128

36[*]

L

Closed

14

30

124

108

37

L

67

m

Fall

3

No

Closed

10

28

156

120

38

R

24

m

Fall

4

No

Closed

2

22

154

130

39

L

70

m

Traffic accident

No

Closed

12

22

130

118

40

R

52

m

Fall

4

No

Closed

0

20

112

108

40[*]

L

Closed

-22

12

152

118

41

R

59

f

Fall

3

No

Closed

-8

32

170

116

42

L

49

m

Fall

3

No

Closed

14

38

146

108

43

L

58

f

Fall

4

No

Closed

6

14

152

122

44

R

26

m

Fall

4

Yes

Closed

6

30

140

108

44[*]

L

0

26

148

112

45

R

16

m

Gunshot wound

No

Open

10

36

120

120

46

L

m

Traffic accident

No

Open

4

30

110

118

47

R

26

m

Traffic accident

No

Closed

-2

42

142

108

48

R

29

m

Traffic accident

No

Closed

0

20

138

102

49

R

29

m

Fall

4

No

Closed

0

24

140

102

49[*]

L

Closed

4

22

138

112

Abbreviations: R, right; L, left; m, male, f, female.


* contralateral fracture at the same patient.


Table 2

Preoperative (standard deviation)

Postoperative (standard deviation)

p-value[*]

Böhler angle, average value

2.5° (9.5)

25.3° (8.6)

< 0.001

Gissane angle, average value

136.3° (21.3)

114.3° (8.2)

< 0.001

* t-test.



#

Discussion

Calcaneal joint fractures have significant morbidity, constituting severe injuries that often cause disabling and permanent sequelae. They usually affect young males in an economically active age group and may cause great socioeconomic impairment. In the studied sample, 89.79% of the patients were male, with a mean age of 39 years-old, reinforcing the statement that these injuries affect individuals in full exercise of their socioeconomic functions. In the literature, the most frequent causal agent reported was falls, which is consistent with our sample (71.42%).[13]

Although this is a widely studied fracture, there is still no consensus on its classification, treatment, and ideal surgical technique.[14] The literature is scarce on high-level evidence studies on surgical techniques for calcaneal fractures. Many studies report several surgical techniques, but few compare them. In terms of functionality, according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire, a minimally invasive percutaneous fixation technique using Kirschner wires has superior results and fewer complications when compared with more invasive techniques.[15]

Here, we report surgical outcome of 49 patients (64 injuries) with calcaneal joint fractures treated through a minimally invasive surgical method under the premise of possible functional recovery with no treatment complications, which should be deemed unacceptable.

The comparison of pre- and postoperative radiographies revealed an improvement in the angle of Böhler, from 2.5 to 25.3° (which is within the normal range, i.e., from 20–40°) and in the angle of Gissane, from 136.3 to 114.3° (which is also within the normal range, i.e., from 100–120°). The comparison between mean pre- and postoperative angles in this sample showed a high statistical significance, according to the t-test (p < 0.001), suggesting a positive association between good results regarding the angles of Böhler and Gissane and the use of minimally invasive surgical technique.

Calcaneal anatomical parameters recovery may be similar between the minimally invasive technique and the conventional technique, as shown by Yeo et al,[16] who compared the postoperative radiographic results of the conventional technique with broad lateral approach (correction of the angles of Böhler and Gissane average values to 25.5° and 119.0°, respectively) with the minimally invasive technique by subtalar approach (correction of the angles of Böhler and Gissane to 26.5° and 115.5°, respectively). These authors also showed a lower rate of surgical wound complications when the minimally invasive technique was performed.

In a meta-analysis, Wang et al[17] demonstrated that the conventional technique presented more postoperative complications compared to the minimally invasive technique but found no statistical difference when comparing the postoperative radiographic results of the angles of Böhler and Gissane.

Loucks e Buckley[5] conducted a prospective randomized study to assess the angle of Böhler and its correlation with fracture treatment outcomes. They observed that surgical treatment improved the values and functional conditions of the angle. These results from the radiographic evaluation reflect the adequate recovery of the calcaneal anatomical shape with the surgical technique employed. Angle restoration is directly related to the quality of fragment reduction.

The improvement of these angles does not guarantee that the functional result will be successful, and this study does not intend to perform a functional evaluation.

A limitation of this study is the lack of calcaneal fractures grouping per severity. Some patients did not have adequate images for fracture classification in their medical records. This can make it difficult to understand which groups of fractures are most amenable to minimally invasive surgical treatment with good radiographic results.


#

Conclusion

In our sample, the minimally invasive surgical technique improved the angles of Böhler and Gissane in intra-articular calcaneal fractures, resulting in an adequate recovery of the anatomical shape.


#
#

Conflitos de Interesse

Os autores declaram não haver conflitos de interesse.

* Study performed at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.


  • Referências

  • 1 Fernandes TD, Santos ALG. Fraturas dos ossos do pé no adulto. In: Hebert S, Barros Filho TEP, Xavier R, Pardini Junior AG. Ortopedia e traumatologia princípios e práticas. 4ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009: 1529-1530
  • 2 Costa P, Cardoso H. Fractura do calcâneo. Rev Port Ortop Traumatol 2013; 21 (01) 109-115
  • 3 Sanders RW, Clare MP. Fractures of calcaneus. In: Court-Brown C, Heckman JD, McKee M, McQueen MM, Ricci W. , editors. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 2015: 2639-2685
  • 4 Contreras MK, Muniz AS, Souza JB, Avila AV. Biomechanical evaluation of intra articular calcaneal fracture and clinical radiographic correlation. Acta Ortop Bras 2004; 12 (02) 104-111
  • 5 Loucks C, Buckley R. Bohler's angle: correlation with outcome in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1999; 13 (08) 554-558
  • 6 Essex-Lopresti P. The mechanism, reduction technique, and results in fractures of the os calcis. Br J Surg 1952; 39 (157) 395-419
  • 7 Netzahualcóyotl Blass JPF, Gutiérrez MI, Makkozzay PTH. Resultado clínico-radiológico del tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas intra-articulares del calcáneo. Acta Ortop Mex 2004; 18 (01) 21-24
  • 8 Lopes AS, Pinto RZ, Gonçalves EL, Melo GL, Leal RT. Surgical treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus using a less invasive approach. Rev Bras Ortop 2008; 43 (10) 426-432
  • 9 Lara LC, Franco NF, Montesi DN, Macedo CF, Chagas FF, Bicudo LR. Tratamento das fraturas articulares do calcâneo: avaliação dos resultados. Rev ABTPe 2009; 3 (01) 22-28
  • 10 Prado Júnior I, Rocha MA, Rezende RR. Tratamento cirúrgico das fraturas intraarticulares desviadas do calcâneo, através de osteossíntese interna, sem enxerto ósseo. Rev Bras Ortop 1999; 34 (07) 421-429
  • 11 Harvey EJ, Grujic L, Early JS, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ. Morbidity associated with ORIF of intra-articular calcaneus fractures using a lateral approach. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22 (11) 868-873
  • 12 Paula SP, Biondo ML, Luzzi R. Evolução das fraturas intra-articulares desviadas do calcâneo com tratamento cirúrgico. Acta Ortop Bras 2006; 14 (01) 35-39
  • 13 Köberle G, Oliveira AC, Sandoval PS. Fraturas intra-articulares do calcâneo. Rev Bras Ortop 1996; 31 (06) 477-480
  • 14 Sanders R. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (02) 225-250
  • 15 Pelliccioni AA, Bittar CK, Zabeu JL. Tratamento cirúrgico de fraturas intraarticulares de calcâneo sanders II e III: revisão sistemática. Acta Ortop Bras 2012; 20 (01) 39-42
  • 16 Yeo JH, Cho HJ, Lee KB. Comparison of two surgical approaches for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: sinus tarsi versus extensile lateral approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 63
  • 17 Wang XJ, Su YX, Li L, Zhang ZH, Wei XC, Wei L. Percutaneous poking reduction and fixation versus open reduction and fixation in the treatment of displaced calcaneal fractures for Chinese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin J Traumatol 2016; 19 (06) 362-367

Endereço para correspondência

Réjelos Charles Aguiar Lira, MD
Instituto Dr José Frota
Rua Barão do Rio Branco, 1816, Centro, Fortaleza, CE, 60025-061
Brasil   

  • Referências

  • 1 Fernandes TD, Santos ALG. Fraturas dos ossos do pé no adulto. In: Hebert S, Barros Filho TEP, Xavier R, Pardini Junior AG. Ortopedia e traumatologia princípios e práticas. 4ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009: 1529-1530
  • 2 Costa P, Cardoso H. Fractura do calcâneo. Rev Port Ortop Traumatol 2013; 21 (01) 109-115
  • 3 Sanders RW, Clare MP. Fractures of calcaneus. In: Court-Brown C, Heckman JD, McKee M, McQueen MM, Ricci W. , editors. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 2015: 2639-2685
  • 4 Contreras MK, Muniz AS, Souza JB, Avila AV. Biomechanical evaluation of intra articular calcaneal fracture and clinical radiographic correlation. Acta Ortop Bras 2004; 12 (02) 104-111
  • 5 Loucks C, Buckley R. Bohler's angle: correlation with outcome in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1999; 13 (08) 554-558
  • 6 Essex-Lopresti P. The mechanism, reduction technique, and results in fractures of the os calcis. Br J Surg 1952; 39 (157) 395-419
  • 7 Netzahualcóyotl Blass JPF, Gutiérrez MI, Makkozzay PTH. Resultado clínico-radiológico del tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas intra-articulares del calcáneo. Acta Ortop Mex 2004; 18 (01) 21-24
  • 8 Lopes AS, Pinto RZ, Gonçalves EL, Melo GL, Leal RT. Surgical treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus using a less invasive approach. Rev Bras Ortop 2008; 43 (10) 426-432
  • 9 Lara LC, Franco NF, Montesi DN, Macedo CF, Chagas FF, Bicudo LR. Tratamento das fraturas articulares do calcâneo: avaliação dos resultados. Rev ABTPe 2009; 3 (01) 22-28
  • 10 Prado Júnior I, Rocha MA, Rezende RR. Tratamento cirúrgico das fraturas intraarticulares desviadas do calcâneo, através de osteossíntese interna, sem enxerto ósseo. Rev Bras Ortop 1999; 34 (07) 421-429
  • 11 Harvey EJ, Grujic L, Early JS, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ. Morbidity associated with ORIF of intra-articular calcaneus fractures using a lateral approach. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22 (11) 868-873
  • 12 Paula SP, Biondo ML, Luzzi R. Evolução das fraturas intra-articulares desviadas do calcâneo com tratamento cirúrgico. Acta Ortop Bras 2006; 14 (01) 35-39
  • 13 Köberle G, Oliveira AC, Sandoval PS. Fraturas intra-articulares do calcâneo. Rev Bras Ortop 1996; 31 (06) 477-480
  • 14 Sanders R. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (02) 225-250
  • 15 Pelliccioni AA, Bittar CK, Zabeu JL. Tratamento cirúrgico de fraturas intraarticulares de calcâneo sanders II e III: revisão sistemática. Acta Ortop Bras 2012; 20 (01) 39-42
  • 16 Yeo JH, Cho HJ, Lee KB. Comparison of two surgical approaches for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: sinus tarsi versus extensile lateral approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 63
  • 17 Wang XJ, Su YX, Li L, Zhang ZH, Wei XC, Wei L. Percutaneous poking reduction and fixation versus open reduction and fixation in the treatment of displaced calcaneal fractures for Chinese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin J Traumatol 2016; 19 (06) 362-367

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Representação esquemática do ângulo de Böhler.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Representação esquemática do ângulo de Gissane.
Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Schematic representation of Bohler angle.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Schematic representation of Gissane angle.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Pacientes com fratura de calcâneo divididos por sexo. Fortaleza, CE, 2017.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Fraturas de calcâneo por mecanismo de trauma. Fortaleza, CE, 2017. Abreviatura: FAF, ferimento por arma de fogo.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Patients with calcaneal fractures according to gender. Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 2017.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Calcaneal fractures according to trauma mechanism. Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 2017. GSW, gunshot wound.