Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(03): 171-179
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722983
Research Article

The Relationship between Psychoacoustic and Electrophysiological Assessments of Temporal Resolution

Kamran Heydari
1   Department of Audiology, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Ali Akbar Tahaei
1   Department of Audiology, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Akram Pourbakht
1   Department of Audiology, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Hamid Haghani
2   Department of Biostatistics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Ahmadreza Nazeri
3   Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Temporal resolution is essential to speech acoustic perception. However, it may alter in individuals with auditory disorders, impairing the development of spoken and written language. The envelope of speech signals contains amplitude modulation (AM) that has critical information. Any problem reducing the listener's sensitivity to these amplitude variations (auditory temporal acuity) is likely to cause speech comprehension problems. The modulation detection threshold (MDT) test is a measure for evaluating temporal resolution. However, this test cannot be used for patients with poor cooperation; therefore, objective evaluation of MDT is essential.

Purpose The main aim of this study is to find the association between the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and psychoacoustic measurement of MDT at different intensity levels and to assess the amplitude and phase of ASSR as a function of modulation depth.

Design This was a correlational research.

Study Sample Eighteen individuals (nine males and nine females) with normal hearing sensitivity, aged between 18 and 23 years, participated in this study.

Data Collection and Analysis ASSR was recorded at fixed AM rates and variable AM depths for carrier frequencies of 1,000 and 2,000 Hz with varying intensities. The least AM depth, efficient to evoke an ASSR response, was interpreted as the physiological detection threshold of AM. The ASSR amplitude and phase, as a function of AM depth, were also evaluated at an intensity level of 60 dB hearing level (HL) with modulation rates of 40 and 100 Hz. Moreover, the Natus instrument (Biologic Systems) was used for the electrophysiological measurements. An AC40 clinical audiometer (Intra-acoustic, Denmark) was also used for the psychoacoustic measurement of MDT in a similar setting to ASSR, using the two-alternative forced choice method. Pearson's correlation test and linear regression model and paired t-test were used for statistical analyses.

Results A significant positive correlation was found between psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measurements at a carrier frequency of 1000 Hz, with a modulation rate of 40 Hz at intensity levels of 60 dB HL (r = 0.63, p = 0.004), 50 dB HL (r = 0.52, p = 0.02). A significant positive correlation was also found at a carrier frequency of 2000 Hz, with a modulation rate of 47 Hz at 60 dB HL (r = 0.55, p = 0.01) and 50 dB HL (r = 0.67, p = 0.002) and a modulation rate of 97 Hz at 60 dB HL (r = 0.65, p = 0.003). Moreover, a significant association was found between the modulation depth and ASSR amplitude and phase increment at carrier frequencies of 1,000 and 2000 Hz, with modulation rates of 40 and 100 Hz.

Conclusion There was a significant correlation between ASSR and behavioral measurement of MDT, even at low intensities with low modulation rates of 40 and 47 Hz. The ASSR amplitude and phase increment was a function of modulation depth increase. The findings of this study can be used as a basis for evaluating the relationship between two approaches in the clinical population.

Keywords

psychoacoustic - electrophysiological - temporal resolution - ASSR - MDT


Publication History

Received: 11 February 2020

Accepted: 13 September 2020

Article published online:
19 April 2021

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995; 270 (5234): 303-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rawool VW. A temporal processing primer. Part 1. Defining key concepts in temporal processing. The Hearing Review 2006; 13: 30-34
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Starr A, Picton TW, Sininger Y, Hood LJ, Berlin CI. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996; 119 (Pt 3): 741-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zeng FG, Liu S. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49 (02) 367-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vandermosten M, Boets B, Luts H, Poelmans H, Wouters J, Ghesquière P. Impairments in speech and nonspeech sound categorization in children with dyslexia are driven by temporal processing difficulties. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32 (02) 593-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Plakas A, van Zuijen T, van Leeuwen T, Thomson JM, van der Leij A. Impaired non-speech auditory processing at a pre-reading age is a risk-factor for dyslexia but not a predictor: an ERP study. Cortex 2013; 49 (04) 1034-1045
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Leite Romero AC, Capellini BA, Frizzo ACF. Auditory temporal processing in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD). J SciElo Rev CEFAC 2015; 17 (02) 439-444
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Gelfand S. Hearing: Introduction to Psychological and Physiological Acoustic. 5th edition. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2010: 175
    Google Scholar
  • 9 DiMattina C, Wang X. Virtual vocalization stimuli for investigating neural representations of species-specific vocalizations. J Neurophysiol 2006; 95 (02) 1244-1262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sayles M, Füllgrabe C, Winter IM. Neurometric amplitude-modulation detection threshold in the guinea-pig ventral cochlear nucleus. J Physiol 2013; 591 (13) 3401-3419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Viemeister NF. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66 (05) 1364-1380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stapells DR, Linden D, Suffield JB, Hamel G, Picton TW. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear 1984; 5 (02) 105-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kuwada S, Anderson JS, Batra R, Fitzpatrick DC, Teissier N, D'Angelo WR. Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13 (04) 188-204
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Picton TW. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 2004; 25 (01) 68-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cone B, Garinis A. Auditory steady-state responses and speech feature discrimination in infants. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (10) 629-643
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Picton TW, Dimitrijevic A, Perez-Abalo MC, Van Roon P. Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (03) 140-156
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Alaerts J, Luts H, Hofmann M, Wouters J. Cortical auditory steady-state responses to low modulation rates. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (08) 582-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Leigh-Paffenroth ED, Murnane OD. Auditory steady state responses recorded in multitalker babble. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (02) 86-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mc Anally I, Stein JF. Audiology temporal coding in dyslexia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 1996 263. 961-965
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Menell P, McAnally KI, Stein JF. Psychophysical sensitivity and physiological response to amplitude modulation in adult dyslexic listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (04) 797-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Picton TW, Skinner CR, Champagne SC, Kellett AJ, Maiste AC. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82 (01) 165-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 John MS, Dimitrijevic A, van Roon P, Picton TW. Multiple auditory steady- state responses to, AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurotol 2001; (01) 12-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Poelmans H, Luts H, Vandermosten M, Boets B, Ghesquière P, Wouters J. Auditory steady state cortical responses indicate deviant phonemic-rate processing in adults with dyslexia. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (01) 134-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Manju V, Gopika KK, Arivudai Nambi PM. Association of auditory steady state responses with perception of temporal modulations and speech in noise. ISRN Otolaryngol 2014; 2014: 374035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dimitrijevic A, Alsamri J, John MS, Purcell D, George S, Zeng FG. Human envelope following responses to amplitude modulation: effects of aging and modulation depth. Ear Hear 2016; 37 (05) e322-e335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Sixth edition. 2013. Leiden: Boston: Brill: 183;
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Kohlrausch A, Fassel R, Dau T. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108 (02) 723-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bentler R, Mueller HG, Ricketts TR. Modern Hearing Aids. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2016. 65, 95, 96
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49 (02) 2 , 467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Klump GM, Okanoya K. Temporal modulation transfer functions in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): I. Psychophysical modulation detection thresholds. Hear Res 1991; 52 (01) 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gleich O, Klump GM. Temporal modulation transfer functions in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris): II. Responses of auditory-nerve fibres. Hear Res 1995; 82 (01) 81-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Krishna BS, Semple MN. Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84 (01) 255-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Borina F, Firzlaff U, Schuller G, Wiegrebe L. Representation of echo roughness and its relationship to amplitude-modulation processing in the bat auditory midbrain. Eur J Neurosci 2008; 27 (10) 2724-2732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Johnson JS, Yin P, O'Connor KN, Sutter ML. Ability of primary auditory cortical neurons to detect amplitude modulation with rate and temporal codes: neurometric analysis. J Neurophysiol 2012; 107 (12) 3325-3341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Niwa M, Johnson JS, O'Connor KN, Sutter ML. Active engagement improves primary auditory cortical neurons' ability to discriminate temporal modulation. J Neurosci 2012; 32 (27) 9323-9334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Rees A, Green GG, Kay RH. Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear Res 1986; 23 (02) 123-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Picton T. Hearing in time: evoked potential studies of temporal processing. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (04) 385-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kuwada S, Batra R, Maher VL. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 1986; 21 (02) 179-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Elberling C, Don M.. Detecting and assessing synchronous neural activity in the temporal domain (SNR, response detection). In: Burkard R, Don M, Eggermont JJ. eds Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 122
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Eggermont JJ. Electric and magnetic fields of synchronous neural activity. In: Don RM, Eggermont JJ. eds. Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 11
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Hall DA, Haggard MP, Akeroyd MA. et al. Modulation and task effects in auditory processing measured using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 10 (03) 107-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Boettcher FA, Poth EA, Mills JH, Dubno JR. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res 2001; 153 (1-2): 32-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Cohen LT, Rickards FW, Clark GM. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (05) 2467-2479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff PJ. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981; 78 (04) 2643-2647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Joris PX, Schreiner CE, Rees A. Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol Rev 2004; 84 (02) 541-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Relationship between peripheral and psychophysical measures of amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (05) e268-e284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar