Bereaved Parents: Insights for the Antenatal Consultation

Marlyse F. Haward; John M. Lorenz; Annie Janvier; Baruch Fischhoff

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1731651

American Journal of Perinatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(08): 874-882
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731651

Original Article

Bereaved Parents: Insights for the Antenatal Consultation

Marlyse F. Haward

¹Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

,

John M. Lorenz

²Department of Pediatrics, Morgan Stanley Children Hospital of New York, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York

,

Annie Janvier

³Department of Pediatrics, Bureau de l'Éthique Clinique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

⁴Division of Neonatology, Research Center, Clinical Ethics Unit, Palliative Care Unit, Unité de recherche en éthique clinique et partenariat famille, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada

,

Baruch Fischhoff

⁵Department of Engineering and Public Policy and Institute for Politics and Strategy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to explore experiences of extremely preterm infant loss in the delivery room and perspectives about antenatal consultation.

Study Design Bereaved participants were interviewed, following a semi-structured protocol. Personal narratives were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach.

Results In total, 13 participants, reflecting on 17 pregnancies, shared positive, healing and negative, harmful interactions with clinicians and institutions: feeling cared for or abandoned, doubted or believed, being treated rigidly or flexibly, and feeling that infant's life was valued or not. Participants stressed their need for personalized information, individualized approaches, and affective support. Their decision processes varied; some wanted different things for themselves than what they recommended for others. These interactions shaped their immediate experiences, long-term well-being, healing, and regrets. All had successful subsequent pregnancies; few returned to institutions where they felt poorly treated.

Conclusion Antenatal consultations can be strengthened by personalizing them, within a strong caregiver relationship and supportive institutional practices.

Key Points

Personalized antenatal consultations should strive to balance cognitive and affective needs.
Including perspectives from bereaved parents can strengthen antenatal consultations.
Trusting provider-parent partnerships are pivotal for risk communication.

Keywords

decision-making - antenatal consultation - extreme prematurity - parents - bereavement

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Batton DG. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Clinical report--antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (01) 422-427
2 Jefferies AL, Kirpalani HM. Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and Newborn Committee. Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Paediatr Child Health 2012; 17 (08) 443-446
3 Cummings J. COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (03) 588-595
4 Grobman WA, Kavanaugh K, Moro T, DeRegnier RA, Savage T. Providing advice to parents for women at acutely high risk of periviable delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (05) 904-909
5 Kharrat A, Moore GP, Beckett S, Nicholls SG, Sampson M, Daboval T. Antenatal consultations at extreme prematurity: a systematic review of parent communication needs. J Pediatr 2018; 196: 109-115.e7
6 Gaucher N, Nadeau S, Barbier A, Janvier A, Payot A. Personalized antenatal consultations for preterm labor: responding to mothers' expectations. J Pediatr 2016; 178: 130-134.e7
7 Henley A, Schott J. The death of a baby before, during or shortly after birth: good practice from the parents' perspective. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 13 (05) 325-328
8 Gold KJ. Navigating care after a baby dies: a systematic review of parent experiences with health providers. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (04) 230-237
9 Yee WH, Sauve R. What information do parents want from the antenatal consultation?. Paediatr Child Health 2007; 12 (03) 191-196
10 Smith LK, Dickens J, Bender Atik R, Bevan C, Fisher J, Hinton L. Parents' experiences of care following the loss of a baby at the margins between miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death: a UK qualitative study. BJOG 2020; 127 (07) 868-874
11 Payot A, Gendron S, Lefebvre F, Doucet H. Deciding to resuscitate extremely premature babies: how do parents and neonatologists engage in the decision?. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64 (07) 1487-1500
12 Boss RD, Hutton N, Sulpar LJ, West AM, Donohue PK. Values parents apply to decision-making regarding delivery room resuscitation for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (03) 583-589
13 Hoyle RH, Harris MJ, Judd CM. Research Methods in Social Relations. Wadsworth, Thompson Learning; 2002
14 Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman C. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge University Press; 2002
15 Bruine de Bruin W, Bostrom A. Assessing what to address in science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110 (Suppl. 03) 14062-14068
16 Haward MF, Janvier A, Lorenz JM, Fischhoff B. Counseling parents at risk of delivery of an extremely premature infant: differing strategies. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017; 8 (04) 243-252
17 Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, Gutmann NL, Hanson WE. Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: A.Tashakkori and C.Teddlie, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003: 209-240
18 Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000
19 Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 (09) 1277-1288
20 Geurtzen R, Draaisma J, Hermens R. et al. Prenatal (non)treatment decisions in extreme prematurity: evaluation of decisional conflict and regret among parents. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (09) 999-1002
21 Caeymaex L, Jousselme C, Vasilescu C. et al. Perceived role in end-of-life decision making in the NICU affects long-term parental grief response. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013; 98 (01) F26-F31
22 Lasiuk GC, Comeau T, Newburn-Cook C. Unexpected: an interpretive description of parental traumas' associated with preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13 (Suppl. 01) S13
23 Everly Jr GS, Mitchell JT. The debriefing “controversy” and crisis intervention: a review of lexical and substantive issues. Int J Emerg Ment Health 2000; 2 (04) 211-225
24 Kavan MG, Guck TP, Barone EJ. A practical guide to crisis management. Am Fam Physician 2006; 74 (07) 1159-1164
25 Robertson EG, Wakefield CE, Shaw J. et al. Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents' and adolescents' views and perceptions. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27 (11) 4331-4340
26 Young E, Tsai E, O'Riordan A. A qualitative study of predelivery counselling for extreme prematurity. Paediatr Child Health 2012; 17 (08) 432-436
27 Haward MF, Murphy RO, Lorenz JM. Message framing and perinatal decisions. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (01) 109-118
28 Lantos JD. Ethical problems in decision making in the neonatal ICU. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (19) 1851-1860
29 Olivia Kim U, Barnekow K, Ahamed SI. et al. Smartphone-based prenatal education for parents with preterm birth risk factors. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102 (04) 701-708
30 Fischhoff B, Barnato AE. Value awareness: a new goal for end-of-life decision making. MDM Policy Pract 2019; 4 (01) 2381468318817523
31 Fischhoff B, Broomell SB. Judgment and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 2020; 71: 331-355
32 Janvier A, Leblanc I, Barrington KJ. Nobody likes premies: the relative value of patients' lives. J Perinatol 2008; 28 (12) 821-826
33 Janvier A, Mercurio MR. Saving vs creating: perceptions of intensive care at different ages and the potential for injustice. J Perinatol 2013; 33 (05) 333-335
34 Saigal S, Stoskopf BL, Feeny D. et al. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. JAMA 1999; 281 (21) 1991-1997
35 Weaver MS, October T, Feudtner C, Hinds PS. “Good-parent beliefs”: research, concept, and clinical practice. Pediatrics 2020; 145 (06) e20194018
36 Geurtzen R, van Heijst A, Draaisma J. et al. Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity - Insight into preferences from experienced parents. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102 (08) 1541-1549
37 Lizotte MH, Barrington KJ, Sultan S. et al. Techniques to communicate better with parents during end-of-life scenarios in neonatology. Pediatrics 2020; 145 (02) e20191925
38 Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington KJ, Bourque CJ, Brazg T, Wilfond B. Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med 2020; 34 (03) 262-271
39 Gaucher N, Payot A. Focusing on relationships, not information, respects autonomy during antenatal consultations. Acta Paediatr 2017; 106 (01) 14-20
40 Caeymaex L, Speranza M, Vasilescu C. et al. Living with a crucial decision: a qualitative study of parental narratives three years after the loss of their newborn in the NICU. PLoS One 2011; 6 (12) e28633
41 Moro TT, Kavanaugh K, Savage TA, Reyes MR, Kimura RE, Bhat R. Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: from the prenatal through end-of-life period. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2011; 25 (01) 52-60
42 Watson J, Simmonds A, La Fontaine M, Fockler ME. Pregnancy and infant loss: a survey of families' experiences in Ontario Canada. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19 (01) 129
43 Snaman JM, Kaye EC, Torres C, Gibson DV, Baker JN. Helping parents live with the hole in their heart: the role of health care providers and institutions in the bereaved parents' grief journeys. Cancer 2016; 122 (17) 2757-2765
44 Sanchez NA. Mothers' perceptions of benefits of perinatal loss support offered at a major university hospital. J Perinat Educ 2001; 10 (02) 23-30
45 Janvier A, Farlow B, Baardsnes J, Pearce R, Barrington KJ. Measuring and communicating meaningful outcomes in neonatology: a family perspective. Semin Perinatol 2016; 40 (08) 571-577
46 Guon J, Wilfond BS, Farlow B, Brazg T, Janvier A. Our children are not a diagnosis: the experience of parents who continue their pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18. Am J Med Genet A 2014; 164A (02) 308-318
47 Lang A, Fleiszer AR, Duhamel F, Sword W, Gilbert KR, Corsini-Munt S. Perinatal loss and parental grief: the challenge of ambiguity and disenfranchised grief. Omega (Westport) 2011; 63 (02) 183-196
48 Cacciatore J. Stillbirth: patient-centered psychosocial care. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53 (03) 691-699
49 Lou S, Jensen LG, Petersen OB. et al. Parental response to severe or lethal prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37 (08) 731-743
50 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births Final Data for 2019. National Vital Statistics Reports; Vol 70 (2). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2021 Accessed April 12, 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr70/nvsr70-02-508.pdf
51 Pector EA. Views of bereaved multiple-birth parents on life support decisions, the dying process, and discussions surrounding death. J Perinatol 2004; 24 (01) 4-10