Factors Associated with Timely Surgery for Semi-elective Distal Radius Fracture Fixation

Abstract

Background In the United Kingdom, national guidance recommends intra-articular distal radius fractures should undergo surgery within 72 hours and extra-articular fractures within 7 days.

Purpose We investigated if hospitals can provide timely surgery and meet national guidelines in patients who are sent home following distal radius fracture (DRF) to return for planned surgery. The influence of patient, hospital, and seasonal factors on wait to surgery are investigated.

Patients and Methods We reviewed Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data between April 2009 and March 2013. Proportion of procedures being performed within 3 and 7 days was calculated. A linear regression model was created to investigate the relationship between wait for surgery and patient and hospital factors.

Results A total of 9,318 patients were sent home to return for planned acute DRF surgery during the 4-year study period. Mean time to surgery was 3.04 days (range 1–days, standard deviation [SD] 3.14). A total of 6,538 patients underwent surgery within 3 days (70.2%) and 8,747 within 7 days (93.9%). Patients listed for surgery and sent home to return waited longer if listed toward the end of the week. Less surgery was performed at weekends, and patients were less likely to be listed for semielective trauma surgery.

Conclusions Acute semielective DRF fixation is generally performed within targets for extra-articular fractures but there is scope for improvement for intra-articular fractures. Day of presentation and increasing number of comorbidities increase wait for surgery. Hospital trusts should focus on improving pathways for patients with multiple comorbidities and strategies to improve accessibility of these services at weekends.

Keywords

distal radius fracture - wrist fracture - trauma surgery - day case surgery

Note

N.J. affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported, that no important aspects of the study have been omitted, and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 09. Juni 2021

Angenommen: 24. September 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. November 2021

• References

• 1 O'Neill TW, Cooper C, Finn JD. et al; UK Colles' Fracture Study Group. Incidence of distal forearm fracture in British men and women. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12 (07) 555-558
• 2 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Fractures (non-complex): assessment and management NICE Guideline NG38. Accessed October 9, 2021 at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng38/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-2358460765
• 3 Baraza N, Lever S, Dhukaram V. Home therapy pathway - safe and streamlined method of initial management of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Surg 2013; 19 (04) 250-254
• 4 Bernstein DT, Chen C, Zhang W, McKay SD. National trends in operative treatment of pediatric fractures in the ambulatory setting. Orthopedics 2015; 38 (10) e869-e873
• 5 Smith I. Emergency day surgery. J One Day Surg 2009; 19: 2-3
• 6 Chandratreya AP, Spalding TJ, Correa R. Development and efficiency of an acute knee trauma list. Injury 2006; 37 (06) 502-506
• 7 Curtis MJ, Samsoon G, Parmar N. Fixation of clavicle fractures. J One Day Surg 2004; 14 (04) 89
• 8 Schonauer F, Garner JP, Pereira JA, Pickford MA. Introduction of a hand trauma day surgery operating list. Ambul Surg 2001; 9 (02) 99-102
• 9 Court-Brown CM, Aitken SA, Duckworth AD, Clement ND, McQueen MM. The relationship between social deprivation and the incidence of adult fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (06) e321-e327
• 10 Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47 (11) 1245-1251
• 11 Judd CM, Westfall J, Kenny DA. Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. J Pers Soc Psychol 2012; 103 (01) 54-69
• 12 Colegate-Stone T, Roslee C, Shetty S, Compson J, Sinha J, Tavakkolizadeh A. Audit of trauma case load suitable for a day surgery trauma list and cost analysis. Surgeon 2011; 9 (05) 241-244
• 13 Knirk JL, Jupiter JB. Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (05) 647-659
• 14 Forward DP, Davis TR, Sithole JS. Do young patients with malunited fractures of the distal radius inevitably develop symptomatic post-traumatic osteoarthritis?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (05) 629-637
• 15 Kopylov P, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I, Bengner U. Fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults: a 30-year follow-up. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (01) 45-49
• 16 Costa ML, Achten J, Plant C. et al. UK DRAFFT: a randomised controlled trial of percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking-plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius. Health Technol Assess 2015; 19 (17) 1-124 , v–vi
• 17 Goldstein SD, Papandria DJ, Aboagye J. et al. The “weekend effect” in pediatric surgery - increased mortality for children undergoing urgent surgery during the weekend. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (07) 1087-1091
• 18 Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Tomlinson JS. et al. Wait times for cancer surgery in the United States: trends and predictors of delays. Ann Surg 2011; 253 (04) 779-785
• 19 Davies KE, Houghton K, Montgomery JE. Obesity and day-case surgery. Anaesthesia 2001; 56 (11) 1112-1115
• 20 Aldwinckle RJ, Montgomery JE. Unplanned admission rates and postdischarge complications in patients over the age of 70 following day case surgery. Anaesthesia 2004; 59 (01) 57-59
• 21 Ansell GL, Montgomery JE. Outcome of ASA III patients undergoing day case surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92 (01) 71-74
• 22 Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, British Association of Day Surgery. Day case and short stay surgery: 2. Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (05) 417-434