Die Selbsteinschätzung der Stimmfunktion

Zusammenfassung

Im Vergleich der standardisierten Messinstrumente zur Evaluierung der stimmbezogenen Lebensqualität hat sich der VHI-9i in der klinischen Praxis etabliert. Mit diesen wird der Schweregrad von ausgewählten subjektiven, funktionellen und physischen stimmbezogenen Symptomen im Alltag erfasst. Hierbei werden keine Unterschiede zwischen organischer und funktioneller Dysphonie gemacht. Beim Ausfüllen ist dieser der VHI-9i in zeitökonomischer Hinsicht praktikabel.

Abstract

Compared to the standardized measurement tools for evaluating voice-related quality of life, the VHI-9i is well established in clinical practice. This instrument enables assessment of the severity of selected subjective, functional and physical voice-related symptoms in everyday life. Organic and functional dysphonias are not distinguised by this tool. The VHI-9i is practicable in terms of time needed to implement it.

Schlüsselwörter

stimmbezogene Lebensqualität - Voice Handicap Index (VHI) - Dysphonie

Key words

voice-related quality of life - voice handicap index (VHI) - dysphonia

• Literatur

• 1 Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Reflections on genes and sustainable change: toward a trait and state conceptualization of response shift. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1118-1123
• 2 Nawka T, Wiesmann U, Gonnermann U. Validierung des Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in der deutschen Fassung. [Validation of the German version of the Voice Handicap Index]. HNO 2003; 51: 921-930
• 3 Hogikyan ND, Sethuraman G. Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). J Voice 1999; 13: 557-569
• 4 Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C et al. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997; 6: 66-70
• 5 Benninger MS, Gardner G, Grywalski C. Outcomes of botulinum toxin treatment for patients with spasmodic dysphonia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127: 1083-1085
• 6 Billante CR, Spector B, Hudson M et al. Voice outcome following thyroplasty in patients with cancer-related vocal fold paralysis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2001; 28: 315-321
• 7 Hajioff D, Rattenbury H, Carrie S et al. The effect of Isshiki type 1 thyroplasty on quality of life and vocal performance. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000; 25: 418-422
• 8 Hsiung MW, Pai L, Wang HW. Correlation between voice handicap index and voice laboratory measurements in dysphonic patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 259: 97-99
• 9 Rosen CA, Murry T, Zinn A et al. Voice handicap index change following treatment of voice disorders. J Voice 2000; 14: 619-623
• 10 Roy N, Gray SD, Simon M et al. An evaluation of the effects of two treatment approaches for teachers with voice disorders: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 286-296
• 11 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie e.V. (DGPP) . Voice Handicap Index, deutsche Fassung. 2003
• 12 Hakkesteegt MM, Brocaar MP, Wieringa MH. The applicability of the dysphonia severity index and the voice handicap index in evaluating effects of voice therapy and phonosurgery. J Voice 2010; 24: 199-205
• 13 Niebudek-Bogusz E, Kuzańska A, Woznicka E et al. Assessment of the voice handicap index as a screening tool in dysphonic patients. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2011; 63: 269-272
• 14 Nawka T, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, De Bodt M et al. Item reduction of the voice handicap index based on the original version and on European translations. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2009; 61: 37-48
• 15 Carding PN, Wilson JA, MacKenzie K et al. Measuring voice outcomes: state of the science review. J Laryngol Otol 2009; 123: 823-829
• 16 Machulla R, Hacki T, Hoppe U et al. „Voice Handicap Index“ (VHI) in der stationaren Stimmrehabilitation. HNO 2006; 54: 52-58
• 17 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3186-3191
• 18 Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J et al. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 1549-1556
• 19 Günther S, Rasch T, Klotz M et al. Bestimmung der subjektiven Beeinträchtigung durch Dysphonien. Ein Methodenvergleich. HNO 2005; 53: 895-904
• 20 Hartnick CJ, Volk M, Cunningham M. Establishing normative voice-related quality of life scores within the pediatric otolaryngology population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 1090-1093
• 21 Benninger MS, Ahuja AS, Gardner G. Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients. J Voice 1998; 12: 540-550
• 22 Weigelt S, Krischke S, Klotz M et al. Voice Handicap Index. Instrument zur Bestimmung der subjektiven Beeintrachtigung durch organische und funktionelle Dysphonien. HNO 2004; 52: 751-756
• 23 Gliklich RE, Glovsky RM, Montgomery WW. Validation of a voice outcome survey for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120: 153-158
• 24 Ma EP, Yiu EM. Voice activity and participation profile: assessing the impact of voice disorders on daily activities. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 511-524
• 25 Deary IJ, Wilson JA, Carding PN. VoiSS: a patient-derived Voice Symptom Scale. J Psychosom Res 2003; 54: 483-489
• 26 Wilson JA, Webb A, Carding PN. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004; 29: 169-174
• 27 Deary IJ, Webb A, Mackenzie K. Short, self-report voice symptom scales: psychometric characteristics of the voice handicap index-10 and the vocal performance questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131: 232-235