Aktuelle Neurologie 2016; 43(10): 615-623
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119861
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Telemedizin beim akuten Schlaganfall

Telemedicine Applications in Acute Stroke Care
G. Hubert
1   Abteilung für Neurologie und neurologische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum München-Harlaching, Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH
,
R. Handschu
2   Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Neumarkt i.d. OPf.
,
J. Barlinn
3   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
,
J. Berrouschot
4   Klinik für Neurologie und Neurologische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Altenburger Land
,
H. J. Audebert
5   Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 December 2016 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Aufgrund seiner guten audiovisuellen Erfassbarkeit und der zeitkritischen Effekte der evidenzbasierten Therapien ist der akute Schlaganfall eine Modellerkrankung für die telemedizinische Versorgung über videogestützte neurologische Untersuchung und Teleradiologie. In Deutschland und in vielen anderen Ländern haben sich telemedizinische Schlaganfallnetzwerke rasch verbreitet und sind inzwischen etablierter Teil der Regelversorgung. Die telekonsiliarische Indikationsstellung hat sich bei der Einleitung der Lysetherapie als sicher erwiesen und ermöglicht vielen Patienten eine Lyseehandlung auch in strukturschwachen ländlichen Gebieten. Insbesondere in Deutschland hat sich die Einbettung der telemedizinschen Beratung in das sog. TeleStroke-Unit-Konzept durchgesetzt. Hierbei werden vor Ort alle Elemente der evidenzbasierten Stroke-Unit-Behandlung vorgehalten und lediglich die neurologische Notfalluntersuchung telemedizinisch durchführt. Durch die Netzwerkstruktur ergibt sich die Möglichkeit eines konsequenten Qualitätsmanagements im gesamten Netzwerk. In diesem Konzept konnte eine Prognoseverbesserung für das funktionelle Outcome der in Tele-Stroke-Unit behandelten Schlaganfallpatienten gezeigt werden und die Qualität der Behandlung kann in entsprechenden Netzwerken gemäß der in der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Schlaganfallregister (ADSR) etablierten Qualitätsindikatoren ein gleichwertiges Niveau wie in neurologischen Stroke Units erreichen. Entsprechend besteht für die TeleStroke-Units eine Zertifizierungsmöglichkeit durch die Deutsche Schlaganfallgesellschaft und das Behandlungskonzept ist auch vergütungsseitig in das deutsche DRG-System aufgenommen.

Abstract

Symptoms in stroke can easily be captured audiovisually and effects of evidence-based therapies are time critical. Therefore, stroke has become a model disease for telemedicine using videoconference for clinical examination and teleradiology. In Germany, and many other countries, telemedicine-linked stroke networks have rapidly expanded and are now part of the established healthcare system. Telemedicine-based decision-making on thrombolytic treatment has been shown to be safe and can be extended to underserved rural areas. Particularly in Germany, telemedicine has been embedded into the so-called TeleStroke-Unit concept. In this concept, all elements of the evidence-based Stroke Unit treatment are covered locally, except for the acute neurological examination, which is performed telemedically. When using a network structure, systematic area-wide quality management can be set up. With this concept, improved prognosis was shown for stroke patients, and the quality of treatment within those networks can be similar to that in neurological Stroke Units, assessed by the quality indicators defined by the Commission of German Stroke Registry (ADSR). As a consequence, the German Stroke Society has expanded the certification process to certified TeleStroke Units and refunds of the costs were established within the German DRG-System (diagnosis related groups – German in-patient financial refund system).

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W et al. Do stroke units save lives?. Lancet 1993; 342: 395-398
  • 2 Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1581-1587
  • 3 Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke 1994; 25: 2220-2226
  • 4 Shafqat S, Kvedar JC, Guanci MM et al. Role for telemedicine in acute stroke. Feasibility and reliability of remote administration of the NIH stroke scale. Stroke 1999; 30: 2141-2145
  • 5 Wang S, Lee SB, Pardue C et al. Remote evaluation of acute ischemic stroke: reliability of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale via telestroke. Stroke 2003; 34: e188-e191
  • 6 Handschu R, Littmann R, Reulbach U et al. Telemedicine in emergency evaluation of acute stroke – Interrater agreement in remote video examination with a novel multimedia system. Stroke 2003; 34: 2842-2846
  • 7 Meyer BC, Raman R, Chacon MR et al. Reliability of site-independent telemedicine when assessed by telemedicine-naive stroke practitioners. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 17: 181-186
  • 8 Johnston KC, Worrall BB. Teleradiology Assessment of Computerized Tomographs Online Reliability Study (TRACTORS) for acute stroke evaluation. Telemed J E Health 2003; 9: 227-233
  • 9 Levine SR, Gorman M. „Telestroke“: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 464-469
  • 10 Schwamm LH, Rosenthal ES, Hirshberg A et al. Virtual TeleStroke support for the emergency department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11: 1193-1197
  • 11 Hess DC, Wang S, Hamilton W et al. REACH – Clinical feasibility of a rural telestroke network. Stroke 2005; 36: 2018-2020
  • 12 AWiborg B, Widder P. Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia. Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas: The Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia (TESS) Project. Stroke 2003; 34: 2951-2956
  • 13 Audebert H. Telestroke: effective networking. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 279-282
  • 14 Audebert HJ, Wimmer ML, Hahn R et al. Can telemedicine contribute to fulfill WHO Helsingborg Declaration of specialized stroke care?. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20: 362-369
  • 15 Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Claranau S et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke 2005; 36: 287-291
  • 16 Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Vatankhah B et al. Comparison of tissue plasminogen activator administration management between Telestroke Network hospitals and academic stroke centers: the Telemedical Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care in Bavaria/Germany. Stroke 2006; 37: 1822-1827
  • 17 Schwab-Malek S, Vatankhah B, Bogdahn U et al. Depressive symptoms and quality of life after thrombolysis in stroke: the TEMPiS study. J Neurol 2010; 257: 1848-1854
  • 18 Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU et al. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 742-748
  • 19 Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009; 40: 2635-2660
  • 20 Chowdhury M, Birns J, Rudd A et al. Telemedicine versus face-to-face evaluation in the delivery of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: a single centre experience. Postgrad Med J 2012; 88: 134-137
  • 21 Agarwal S, Day DJ, Sibson L et al. Thrombolysis delivery by a regional telestroke network – experience from the UK National Health Service. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3: e000408
  • 22 Muller-Barna P, Schwamm LH, Haberl RL. Telestroke increases use of acute stroke therapy. Curr Op Neurol 2012; 25: 5-10
  • 23 Wechsler LR, Tsao JW, Levine SR et al. Teleneurology applications: Report of the Telemedicine Work Group of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2013; 80: 670-676
  • 24 Audebert HJ, Saver JL, Starkman S et al. Prehospital stroke care: new prospects for treatment and clinical research. Neurology 2013; 81: 501-508
  • 25 Krebes S, Ebinger M, Baumann AM et al. Development and validation of a dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies. Stroke 2012; 43: 776-781
  • 26 Berglund A, Svensson L, Sjostrand C et al. Higher prehospital priority level of stroke improves thrombolysis frequency and time to stroke unit: the Hyper Acute STroke Alarm (HASTA) study. Stroke 2012; 43: 2666-2670
  • 27 Bergrath S, Reich A, Rossaint R et al. Feasibility of prehospital teleconsultation in acute stroke – a pilot study in clinical routine. PLoS One 2012; 7: e36796
  • 28 Ebinger M, Fiebach JB, Audebert HJ. Mobile computed tomography: prehospital diagnosis and treatment of stroke. Curr Op Neurol 2015; 28: 4-9
  • 29 Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 1622-1631
  • 30 Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A et al. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 397-404
  • 31 Itrat A, Taqui A, Cerejo R et al. Telemedicine in prehospital stroke evaluation and thrombolysis: taking stroke treatment to the doorstep. JAMA Neurol 2016; 73: 162-168
  • 32 Bowry R, Parker S, Rajan SS et al. Benefits of stroke treatment using a mobile stroke unit compared with standard management: the BEST-MSU study run-In phase. Stroke 2015; 46: 3370-3374
  • 33 Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P et al. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2008; 40: 2616-2634
  • 34 Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Freeman EJ et al. Interrater reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: rating by neurologists and nurses in a community-based stroke incidence study. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999; 9: 323-327
  • 35 Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 660-662
  • 36 Meyer BC, Lyden PD, Al-Khoury L et al. Prospective reliability of the STRokE DOC wireless/site independent telemedicine system. Neurology 2005; 64: 1058-1060
  • 37 Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC et al. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine. Neurology 2013; 80: 332-338
  • 38 Coutts SB, Demchuk AM, Barber PA et al. Interobserver variation of ASPECTS in real time. Stroke 2004; 35: e103-e105
  • 39 Zerna C, von Kummer R, Gerber J et al. Telemedical brain computed tomography misinterpretation by stroke neurologists is not associated with thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 24: 1520-1526
  • 40 Jagolino AL, Jia J, Gildersleeve K et al. A call for formal telemedicine training during stroke fellowship. Neurology 2016; 86: 1827-1833
  • 41 Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 9: CD000197
  • 42 Audebert HJ, Schultes K, Tietz V et al. Long-term effects of specialized stroke care with telemedicine support in community hospitals on behalf of the Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS). Stroke 2009; 40: 902-908
  • 43 Handschu R, Scibor M, Wacker A et al. Feasibility of certified quality management in a comprehensive stroke care network using telemedicine: STENO project. Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 1011-1016
  • 44 Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 787-795
  • 45 Amorim E, Shih MM, Koehler SA et al. Impact of telemedicine implementation in thrombolytic use for acute ischemic stroke: the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center telestroke network experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 527-531
  • 46 Muller-Barna P, Hubert GJ, Boy S et al. Telestroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas: 10-year experience of the telemedical project for integrative stroke care. Stroke 2014; 45: 2739-2744
  • 47 Schwab S, Vatankhah B, Kukla C et al. Long-term outcome after thrombolysis in telemedical stroke care. Neurology 2007; 69: 898-903
  • 48 Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 384: 1929-1935
  • 49 Bruno A, Lanning KM, Gross H et al. Timeliness of intravenous thrombolysis via telestroke in Georgia. Stroke 2013; 44: 2620-2662
  • 50 Bray BD, Campbell J, Cloud GC et al. Bigger, faster? Associations between hospital thrombolysis volume and speed of thrombolysis administration in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013; 44: 3129-3135
  • 51 Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723-1731
  • 52 Perez de la Ossa N, Abilleira S, Dorado L et al. Access to endovascular treatment in remote areas: analysis of the reperfusion treatment registry of Catalonia. Stroke 2016; 47: 1381-1384
  • 53 Audebert HJ, Clarmann von Clarenau S, Schenkel J et al. Problems of emergency transfers of patients after a stroke. Results of a telemedicine pilot project for integrated stroke accommodation in southeast Bavaria (TEMPiS). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2005; 130: 2495-2500
  • 54 Muller R, Pfefferkorn T, Vatankhah B et al. Admission facility is associated with outcome of basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2007; 38: 1380-1383
  • 55 Kepplinger J, Dzialowski I, Barlinn K et al. Emergency transfer of acute stroke patients within the East Saxony telemedicine stroke network: a descriptive analysis. Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 160-165
  • 56 DIMDI . OPS Version 2016; Kapitel 8, Nichtoperative therapeutische Maßnahmen. 2016
  • 57 Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Sarti C, Heuschmann PU et al. A prospective community-based study of stroke in Germany – the Erlangen Stroke Project (ESPro): incidence and case fatality at 1, 3, and 12 months. Stroke 1998; 29: 2501-2506
  • 58 Weimar C, Kurth T, Kraywinkel K et al. Assessment of functioning and disability after ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002; 33: 2053-2059
  • 59 Heuschmann PU, Biegler MK, Busse O et al. Development and implementation of evidence-based indicators for measuring quality of acute stroke care: the Quality Indicator Board of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR). Stroke 2006; 37: 2573-2578
  • 60 Ringelstein EB, Berlit P, Busse O et al. Concept of interregional and regional stroke care in Germany (Recommendations of the Commission 1.06 "Stroke Units and Acute Stroke Therapy" of the German Society for Neurology). Nervenarzt 2000; 71: 322-324
  • 61 Nabavi DG, Ringelstein EB, Faiss J et al. Regional and national stroke units in Germany: amended certification criteria. Nervenarzt 2012; 83: 1039-1052
  • 62 International Organization for Standardization . ISO 9001:2008 (en) Quality management systems – requirements.
  • 63 Marquardt L, Köhrmann M, Stark DR et al. Zertifiziertes Qualitätsmanagement in einem telemedizinischen Schlaganfallnetzwerk. Nervenheilkunde 2016; 35: 103-109