An Anatomical Study of Posterior Trunk Recipient Vessels, and Comparisons of Outcome following Pedicled- and Free-Flap Transfers for Treatment of Sarcoma in the Posterior Trunk

Abstract

Background Reconstruction after wide resection of a large sarcoma arising in the posterior trunk may require free-flap transfer to reduce the postoperative complications. Here, we describe the recipient vessels on the whole posterior trunk. Moreover, to show the reliability of these vessels, we describe an institutional series of free-flap reconstruction.

Methods In the cadaveric study, 20 posterior trunk regions from 10 fixed cadavers were dissected. The location and the diameter of the perforating artery and vein on the posterior were documented. In the clinical study, 54 patients undergoing immediate reconstruction surgery with only a pedicled flap (n = 45) and with a free flap (n = 9) after sarcoma resection on the posterior trunk between July 2005 and September 2021 were identified. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare the postoperative complications.

Results In the cadaveric study, a total of 178 perforators were identified. The average diameter of the superficial cervical artery (SCA) and vein, dorsal scapular artery (DSA) and vein, medial branch of dorsal intercostal artery perforator (m-DICAP) and vein, lateral branch of dorsal intercostal artery perforator (l-DICAP) and vein, and dorsolateral intercostal artery perforator (DLICAP) and vein were 1.03, 1.67, 1.38, 1.84, 1.28, 1.84, 1.01, 1.60, 1.11, and 1.70 mm. In the clinical study, the propensity score-matched analysis involving eight pairs showed a significantly higher occurrence of total complications in the pedicled-flap group than the free-flap group (62.5 vs. 0%, p = 0.03).

Conclusion The cadaveric study showed that the perforators from the SCA, DSA, and posterior intercostal artery are constantly present. The clinical study demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of a free-flap transfer.

Keywords

sarcoma - trunk - reconstruction - PAP flap

Financial Disclosure

None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 04. Oktober 2021

Angenommen: 27. Dezember 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. März 2022

• References

• 1 Kroll SS, Rosenfield L. Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81 (04) 561-566
• 2 Casas LA, Lewis Jr VL. A reliable approach to the closure of large acquired midline defects of the back. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84 (04) 632-641
• 3 Evans GR, Reece GP. Lower back reconstruction: an approach to wound closure in the cancer patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (03) 635-642
• 4 McCraw JB, Penix JO, Baker JW. Repair of major defects of the chest wall and spine with the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 62 (02) 197-206
• 5 Scheflan M, Mehrhof Jr AI, Ward JD. Meningomyelocele closure with distally based latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (06) 956-959
• 6 Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42 (06) 645-648
• 7 Brunetti B, Tenna S, Aveta A. et al. Posterior trunk reconstruction with the dorsal intercostal artery perforator based flap: clinical experience on 20 consecutive oncological cases. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (07) 546-551
• 8 Prasad V, Almutairi K, Kimble FW, Stewart F, Morris SF. Dorsolateral musculocutaneous perforators of posterior intercostal artery: an anatomical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (11) 1518-1524
• 9 Minabe T, Harii K. Dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap: anatomical study and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (03) 681-689
• 10 Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H, Murakami M, Aoki R, Tanuma K, Pennington DG. An anatomical and clinical study of the dorsal intercostal cutaneous perforators, and application to free microvascular augmented subdermal vascular network (ma-SVN) flaps. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55 (05) 396-401
• 11 de Weerd L, Weum S. The sensate medial dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap for closure of cervicothoracic midline defects after spinal surgery: an anatomic study and case reports. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (04) 418-421
• 12 Lee YJ, Baek SE, Lee J, Oh DY, Rhie JW, Moon SH. Perforating vessel as an alternative option of a recipient selection for posterior trunk-free flap reconstruction. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (07) 763-771
• 13 Mathes DW, Thornton JF, Rohrich RJ. Management of posterior trunk defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (03) 73e-83e
• 14 Kim JT. Latissimus dorsi perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30 (03) 403-431
• 15 Daniel RK, Kerrigan CL, Gard DA. The great potential of the intercostal flap for torso reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (05) 653-665
• 16 Aho JM, Laungani AT, Herbig KS, Wong C, Kirchoff RW, Saint-Cyr M. Lumbar and thoracic perforators: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (04) 635e-645e
• 17 Prasad V, Morris SF. Propeller DICAP flap for a large defect on the back-case report and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (08) 617-621
• 18 Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46 (03) 399-424
• 19 Haas F, Weiglein A, Schwarzl F, Scharnagl E. The lower trapezius musculocutaneous flap from pedicled to free flap: anatomical basis and clinical applications based on the dorsal scapular artery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (06) 1580-1590
• 20 Seo BF, Choi JY, Han HH. et al. Perforators as recipients for free flap reconstruction of the inguinal and perineal region. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (08) 627-633
• 21 Oh TS, Hallock G, Hong JP. Freestyle propeller flaps to reconstruct defects of the posterior trunk: a simple approach to a difficult problem. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (01) 79-82
• 22 Yoshimatsu H, Karakawa R, Scaglioni MF, Fuse Y, Tanakura K, Yano T. Application of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for detecting flap congestion in the use of free deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (06) 522-526
• 23 Karakawa R, Yoshimatsu H, Tanakura K. et al. An anatomical study of the lymph-collecting vessels of the medial thigh and clinical applications of lymphatic vessels preserving profunda femoris artery perforator (LpPAP) flap using pre- and intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (09) 1768-1774
• 24 Karakawa R, Yoshimatsu H, Fuse Y. et al. The correlation of the perforators and the accessory saphenous vein in a profunda femoris artery perforator flap for additional venous anastomosis: a cadaveric study and clinical application. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (02) 200-206
• 25 Karakawa R, Yoshimatsu H, Maeda E. et al. Use of the profunda femoris artery perforator flap for reconstruction after sarcoma resection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (12) e3289
• 26 Yoshimatsu H, Karakawa R, Fuse Y. et al. Use of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for reconstruction after sarcoma resection. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123 (04) 1067-1080