2 OLED Development
The progress in the world of OLEDs is mounted on “various generations.” For more than
30 years, the OLED technology has evolved in optoelectronics and it has advanced because
of generation-based OLED materials. The “fluorescent emitters” are known as the first
generation, whereas “phosphorescent emitters” are considered as the second generation,
and the third generation leans on light-emitting TADF (thermally activated delayed
fluorescence) emitters. Later on, “next-generation (blue light-emitting diodes)” OLED
emitters were introduced to the market after successfully and firmly establishing
the three generations for a long time. These generations are further divided into
RGB (red, green, blue) colors – for example, green, orange-red and blue emitters –
which play a crucial role in color purity and high efficiency in OLED devices. As
per most of the reported values, the color of the OLED is defined by the EL wavelength
of the emitter.[6] However, for better stability and cost-effectiveness, the blue OLED is in great
demand because it is a complementary color of white and the OLED that emits white
light is brighter in color than than the rest of the uniform color. By considering
this fact, the Commission Internationale de lʼEclairage (CIE) set some criteria, such
as (x, y) must be (0.33, 0.33) for white color resolution.[7] As these coordinates are important to achieve for a desired color for display applications,
they have been therefore added to most of the research interests in OLEDs. As a reason,
we can say that blue emitters have strongly affected the foundation of OLEDs in recent
years. The required CIE coordinates for blue OLEDs are (x, y) (0.15, 0.06) as defined by the National Television Standards Committee.[8] As per the demand nowadays, different devices or a series of emitters with blue
colors are introduced in OLEDs. Despite this, the device must have the highest external
quantum efficiency (EQE), which will give future direction for the best applications
in the field of lighting applications.[9]
2.1 Historical Background of OLEDs
Eosin was the first organic TADF material found in early 1960 that was able to emit
light and this was the initial starting period of research in the field of OLED technology.
Many other simple organic compounds with fluorescence were known but their low efficiency
and color purity were the issues. In 1987, the first OLED was reported by Tang et
al., which was the breakthrough in OLED technology.[10] Since then, continuous research studies have been undertaken in the fields of academia
and industry. In 1988, Kyushu Universityʼs research panel introduced a double heterojunction-based
OLED.[11] Following the work in 1990, the first OLED based on polymer materials was introduced
by scientist Burroughs from Cambridge University. Many years later, a commercial OLED
was successfully developed by Pioneer and was applied to car audio systems.[12] In the middle of 2002, Phillips introduced the first commercial OLED to the market.[13] AMOLEDs (active-matrix OLEDs) were the first full-color active-matrix device. It
was the result of a commercial manufacturing partnership between Eastman Kodak and
Sanyo Electric Company. In 2003, Kodak introduced the first AMLOD digital camera (LS633).[14] In 2005, Sony announced the XEL-1, the first ever OLED TV (11″).[15] National Tsing-Hwa University, Taiwan was the first to demonstrate the sunlight-style
OLED, which was introduced to the market in 2009.[16] In the early 2011, LG announced their 55″ OLED TV prototype, and in the same year,
OSRAM developed the worldʼs most efficient, flexible white OLED.[17] Two years later, LG Chem started producing 320 × 320 mm OLED lighting panels (BMWʼs
M4 GTS) with its OLED tail lights. In the same year, Samsung announced the galaxy
S6 and the S6 Edge and also its R&D research panel introduced the first bendable devices.[18] Even an immensely rollable TV was introduced by LG in 2020. Recently, people were
fascinated by new inventive designs of foldable gadgets such as Samsung (Galaxy fold)
phones, foldable Lenovo laptops, smart iPhone devices, and Intel (ThinkPad XI Fold)
devices, which have gained much attention from the market ([Figure 3]).[19]
Figure 3 An overview of milestones in OLED.
2.1.1 International Status
To enhance the efficiency of OLEDs, tremendous work is going on at the international
level in companies and academic research groups and they are doing work on their toes
to reach new heights in OLED technology. As we know earlier in 2021, CYONARA launched
cyBlueBooster as a blue emitter which has efficiency close to about 15%.[20] Within a short period of time, they assured the world to deliver a hyper-fluorescence
yellow emitting material with a smart chip inside.[21] The estimated income from OLED devices through the market in 2020 was 34.3 billion
USD and it is believed that it will reach around 52 billion USD by 2023.[22] Some of the major players in the OLED market are Samsung, LG Display Co. Ltd., Panasonic
Corporation, and Tohoku Pioneer Corporation.[23] It has been seen that companies and academia both have been taking the same interest
in OLED technology. For example, Cambridge Display Technology Inc., Dresden Microdisplay,
and CYNORA GmbH (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) are taking a prominent interest
in the OLED technology.[24] As these universities have corroboration with companies, in 2007 the Sumitomo Chemical
Group invested 285 million USD and CHIEL (which is now a part of Samsung) invested
260 million Euro on Novaled in 2013.[25] Other than investment, thousands of patents and papers have been reported up until
2019. This strong bond between academia and industry is increasing day by day and
as a result, they organize regular meet-ups, workshops, and international conferences
on OLED technology. Therefore, the investment from both sides led the OLED display
technology to achieve newer heights and hence proves the constant growth in the lighting
field.
2.1.2 National Status
In the area of OLEDs, our nation was not previously focusing on targeted molecules
and established device architectures to achieve highly efficient emitters. However,
in the last 5 years, research has been conducted on a serious note in the OLED field.
On this subject, a few research groups in India are working. To the best of our research
knowledge, University of Delhi,[26] IISE Bangalore, NISER Bhubaneshwar and J. Jayabharthi from Annamalai University[27] and J. Tagare[28] from NIT Rourkela have been involved in this topic with various luminogenic molecules
with collaborating research in organic light-emitting device fabrication and characterization.
The work reported in OLEDs was based on red, blue, and green OLEDs. As we discussed
the scenario of OLEDs nationally and internationally, as compared with international
development, India is somehow lacking in certain aspects. The reason behind this is
less awareness about OLED technology, lack of communication between academia and industry,
improper facilities, and most importantly lack of investment funding. So, here we
briefly introduce the development of OLEDs which has been made to date. Our motto
is to give a glance at OLEDs to create more awareness so that industry and academia
can close the gap of communication between them. Here, we are only giving information
regarding published works done by academia and industry to date to get an exact idea
regarding their further research work in light technology. Besides this, we have only
focused on the development of blue emitters known as the “next generation”.[29] As discussed earlier in the Introduction part, the materials play a crucial role
in color purity and efficiency. If we talk about color purity, the blue color emitter
is in great demand. As these types of devices have excellent color purity and a long
lifetime as compared to other generations, so, here we are just sharing the progress
of the blue OLED light-emitting devices in the past 10 years.
3 Progress of Blue Light Emitters in India
In 2014, Karthik et al. published their work on triplet–triplet fluorescence (TTF)
pyrene-benzimidazole deep blue emitting dopants (PyPIC1–PyPIC5) ([Figure 4]) with different π linkers, for example, phenyl, thiophene, and triphenylamine. All
the emitters displayed deep blue emissions due to the pronounced intramolecular charge
transfer from the donor to the acceptor. The device fabricated by PyPIC2 as an emitter
was capable enough to give blue light emission. In addition, it gives the maximum
luminance of 714 cd/m2, EQE 1.5%, CIE coordinates of (0.16, 0.05) at 100 cd/m2 and 100% color saturation. All the dye probes showed a high thermal decomposition
at around ≥ 470 °C, which indicates good thermal properties the emitters have.[30]
Figure 4 Pyrene-benzimidazole deep blue emitting dopants.
After 3 years in 2015, Kumar and Patil reported a potential application and synthesis
of two-electron transporting blue emitting materials such as TPFDPSO2 and TPFDBTO2
([Figure 5]). These two fluoranthene-based materials were capable enough to fulfill several
requirements used in OLEDs just because of their suitable electronic structure. These
materials exhibit excellent thermal stability with distinct decomposition due to their
rigid backbone structure. Also, these devices have high glass transition temperatures,
which improve the stability and durability of the device. As result, it has been observed
that these devices give nearly five times better device performances as compared to
their parent sulfide molecules. These molecules were used to fabricate the electroluminescent
devices and displayed bright sky-blue color emissions at 460 and 454 nm with efficiencies
of 0.50% and 0.61%, respectively.[31]
Figure 5 Blue emitting materials TPFDPSO2 and TPFDBTO2.
In the same year, Dahule et al. synthesized a DPQ (blue light-emitting 2,4-diphenylquinoline)-substituted
blue light-emitting organic moieties such as OMe-DPQ, M-DPQ, and Br-DPQ ([Figure 6]). These developed molecules are in very low molecular weight, however, capable to
improve the stability and operating lifetime of an OLED device. Electroluminance behavior
was studied for Br-DPQ phosphor. The resultant data characteristic curve revealed
that EL begins at 400, which indicates the brightness of the OLED. The brightness
increases exponentially with applied AC voltage, and the turn-on voltage of the fabricated
device was 11 V. So, the demonstrated compounds were capable enough to show a bright
light blue emission in the wavelength range of 405 – 450 nm in the solid state. So,
this phosphor can be used as a promising blue light material for electroluminescent
devices.[32]
Figure 6 Organic phosphors OMe-DPQ, M-DPQ and Br-DPQ.
Again, the same group of Kumar gave their devotion to develop TPFDPS and TPFDBT fluoranthene
molecules ([Figure 7]). Among the two, one of the molecules, TPFDPS, exhibited a high T
g of around 210 °C. The thermal stability of the compound was found to be up to 500 °C.
Besides this, the synthesized molecule, TBADN, was fabricated on the device to reveal
the various applications as an electron transporting layer. The EQEs of the electron
transporting materials TPFDPS and TPFDBT were found to be 0.04% and 0.40%, respectively.
Both the fluorophores showed blue emission maxima at 466 and 458 nm.[33]
Figure 7 Fluoranthene TPFDPS and TPFDBT derivatives.
In addition to Zinc-based complexes, Nishal et al. developed five Schiff bases: Zn(salen),
Zn(salpen), Zn(salbutene), Zn(salhexene), and Zn(salheptene) ([Figure 8]). These ligands exhibited excellent thermal stability and gave blue luminescence
(430 – 450 nm), which can be easily used for making white light for display applications.
But this material did not prove to be a good efficient device.[34]
Figure 8 Schiff base ligands such as Zn(salen), Zn(salpen), Zn(salbutene), Zn(salhexene) and
Zn(salheptene).
Blue polymeric OLEDs can be significantly used for primary color display applications
and for white light illumination. But after the investigation, Gupta and his team
concluded that only some of the diodes show low efficiency and the reason behind this
was a large band gap as it involves high energy for the desired emission. By considering
this fact, they reported the polyfluorene-based polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene
sulfonate) and it was used as a blue emitter. The emissive layer of the device was
made up of polyfluorene and the hole transport layer was fabricated by a titanium
dioxide-based nanocomposite. It has been observed that if the TiO2 concentration increases in the hole transport layer, a blue peak extends up to 430 nm
and the turn-on voltage of the device also increases. So, the final optimized concentration
for the titanium dioxide was 15 wt% for this proficient device. For the performances
of TiO2 with different concentrations see [Tables 1] and [2].[35]
Table 1 Doping % of TiO2 in PEDOT : PSS derivative
|
Device
|
% of TiO2 in PEDOT : PSS
|
|
1
|
0
|
|
2
|
5
|
|
3
|
10
|
|
4
|
15
|
|
5
|
20
|
Table 2 Performance of the device
|
Device
|
Doping % of TiO2 in PEDOT : PSS
|
Operating voltage (V)
@100 cd/m3
|
Current efficiency (cd/A)
@6 V
|
|
1
|
0
|
12.6
|
0.76
|
|
2
|
5
|
11.5
|
1.35
|
|
3
|
10
|
10.9
|
4.32
|
|
4
|
15
|
9.2
|
6.53
|
|
5
|
20
|
9.6
|
7.30
|
Lakshmanan et al. synthesized three fluorophores named ELC1, ELC2 and ELC3 ([Figure 9]), which were used as electron transporting or electroluminescent materials. All
three compounds have good photophysical and thermal properties. As per their UV spectra,
the excitation band was found at 240 and 330 nm, and the photoluminance spectra were
observed at 385, 405, and 440 nm. Among these three, the fluorescence lifetimes of
ELC1 and ELC2 were found to be around 0.35 and 1.55 and for ELC3 it was 0.29. The calculated value was enhanced from 5.96 (C-1) to 6.08 (C-3) eV.
Hence, it was confirmed that ELC3 is more electron-donating in nature.[36] At the same time, Jadhav et al. successfully synthesized a novel phenanthroimidazole
(PI)-substituted ([Figure 10]) derivative. As we all know that PI shows good thermal stability, they introduced
a cyano group to PI to increase its thermal stability. The PI derivative exhibited
very low emission in solution and a strong emission in the aggregated state because
of the AIE (aggregation-induced emission). As per the mechanochromism, the colors
observed for PI was blue and green. Also, the compounds performed very well as non-doped
blue emitters PIc and PId in OLEDs, giving 3.9% and 4.0% EQEs, respectively.[37]
Figure 9 ELC1, ELC2, and ELC3 fluorophores.
Figure 10 Phenanthroimidazole-substituted derivatives.
The benzophenone moiety was represented as a prototype in the molecular system. Up
until 2016, the molecule was only used in triplet-state chemistry. In the same year,
Jhulki et al. designed three novel hosts: BP2, BP3, and BP4 ([Figure 11]). These phosphorescent molecules contain benzophenone as an active triplet-sensitizing
molecular component. They have the ability to use as a universal host material for
blue phosphor, as the band gap observed for the molecules was 3.91 – 3.93 eV and also
showed excellent triplet energies of 2.95 – 2.97 eV. Hence it has been proven that
they are an exceptional dopant. In addition, the efficiency obtained for the device
was 17.0 – 19.2%, and the emission observed for blue light was at 389 – 410 nm. Among
them, BP2 was an excellent host and it was demonstrated as a proof by co-doping with the device.[38]
Figure 11 Host materials BP2, BP3 and BP4.
Gandeepan et al. successfully produced blue TADF fluorescence emitters such as BPypC,
BPypTC, BPyp2C, and BPyp3C ([Figure 12]). From the density functional theory (DFT) calculations, it was confirmed that the
molecule showed their LUMOs on the benzopyridine moiety. Besides this, from the EL
and photoluminescence (PL) properties, it was confirmed that BPyp3C acts as a very
worthy TADF material. However, the energy gap value for BPypC observed was to be 0.29 eV
and it decreased to 0.05 eV for BPyp3C. However, the maximum EQE of BPypC was 4.2%
and it increased for BPyp3C at 23.9%. This signifies that the EQE of BPyp3C increased
two times more than that of BPypC.[39]
Figure 12 Fluorescence emitters BPypC, BPypTC, BPyp2C and BPyp3C.
Kumar et al. reported symmetrical and non-symmetrical fluoranthene derivatives ([Figure 13]) with different donor and acceptor moieties. These molecules showed a high PL quantum
yield and exhibited deep blue emission in solution and in the solid state. The EL
emission was observed from 477 to 490 nm for sky blue to bluish green because of different
functional groups on the periphery of fluoranthene. The EQE achieved was 1.1 – 1.4%
and the high luminance observed was ≥ 2000 cd/m2.[40]
Figure 13 Fluoranthene derivatives.
Gupta et al. also introduced a new concept of D–π–A for blue emitters. They synthesized
multialkynylbenzene-bridged triphenylene-based molecules ([Figure 14]) by incorporating spacers. All the compounds showed emission at 365 nm in solution
under long UV irradiation. In addition, the molecules were reported to have good thermal
stability, and good yield with high purity. They also fulfilled a criterion required
for a good blue emitter but they did not have that much efficiency as compared to
other blue emitters.[41]
Figure 14 Multialkynylbenzene-bridged triphenylene-based molecules.
Rajamalli et al. synthesized two benzopyridine carbazole-based fluorescence molecules
DCBPy and DTCBPy ([Figure 15]) made up of carbazole and 4-(t-butyl) carbazolyl groups, respectively. The molecules showed very low energy gaps
of 0.03 and 0.04 eV and the PL value proves that they are TADF molecules. The EQE
of the molecules named DCBPy and DTCBPy was reported to be 24.0% and 27.2%, respectively.[42]
Figure 15 Fluorescence DCBPy and DTCBPy molecules.
Pathak et al. introduced a series of five-ring polycatenars (a – d) ([Figure 16]). All the reported molecules played a very important role as compared to the number
of flexible trails in subsequent photophysical characterization. From all the reported
compounds, the p-substituted moiety showed a columnar hexagonal phase, whereas the m-substituted one exhibited a reduced tendency to stabilize the mesophase. All three
p-substituted compounds highly promoted p–p interaction. Besides this, one of the molecules
is capable enough to have AIE in blue light. All these qualities made them promising
molecules for application as emissive layers.[43]
Figure 16 Polycatenar derivatives.
Again, in the same year, Pathakʼs group came up with a new concept and they developed
stilbene derivatives (a – e) in a star shape ([Figure 17]). The compounds were made by linking dialkoxy styrene with benzene at the third
and fifth positions and a single amide linkage at the first position of the central
benzene ring exhibited gelation at a very low concentration in hexadecane. These star-shaped
molecules are applied as blue emitting materials due to their emissive nature in solid
and solution phases and a wide band gap value. The emission maxima observed for the
molecule were in the range of 406 – 412 nm.[44]
Figure 17 Dialkoxy styrene-based molecules (a – e).
Thanikachalam et al. synthesized compounds composed of donor-linker acceptors with
phenyl and styryl as spacers. They are new and good enough to be utilized in non-doped
OLEDs. These newly synthesized blue emissive materials exhibited excellent quantum
efficiency (QE) and high thermal stability (HTS). The styryl spacer containing the
TPA-MPS device exhibited the current efficiency at 1.73 cd/A, power efficiency (PE)
at 1.46 lm/W, and provided 2.11% EQE with 4.6 V. Both the reported emitters TPA-MPI
and TPA-MPS ([Figure 18]) acted as a potential blue candidate for OLEDs.[45]
Figure 18 Emitters TPA‑MPI and TPA‑MPS.
Although there have been many metal-based complexes, Urinda et al. synthesized Ir
(II)-based N^N and C^N complexes ([Figure 19]). They aimed to provide different types of molecules which can have excellent relative
effectiveness. They succeeded and proved that the molecules provided a fine emission
wavelength as a blue phosphorescent. They even modified molecules by fitting the pyridine-tetrazole
as an ancillary ligand and compared it with other nitrogen-rich cyclometalated ligands.
The aftermath was deliberated on the basis of DFT/TDDFT (time-dependent DFT) calculations,
emission properties, and QE. The highest QE was reported for Ir Complex 5 and that
was around 14%. Hence, the complexes added a guideline path to design better performing
OLED materials.[46]
Figure 19 C^N (Ir Complex 1 – 3)-based and N^N (Ir Complex 4 and 5)-based cyclometalating ligands.
As per the literature survey, the blue OLED device started with only 15.8% EQE in
2012 and reached to a record high EQE of almost 27.2% in 2016. The EQE and wavelength
for the reported blue emitter are shown below in [Table 3]
[30]–[46] from the year 2010 to 2016.
Table 3 Reported blue emitters with external quantum efficiency and λmax
|
Sample name
|
EQE (%)
|
λmax (nm)
|
Lifetime (ns)
|
Ref.
|
|
PyPIC2
|
1.5
|
–
|
–
|
[30]
|
|
TPFDPSO2
|
0.50
|
460
|
17
|
[31]
|
|
TPFDBTO2
|
0.61
|
450
|
16
|
[31]
|
|
OMe-DPQ, M-DPQ, Br-DPQ
|
–
|
near 450
|
–
|
[32]
|
|
TPFDPS
|
0.04
|
466
|
13
|
[33]
|
|
TPFDBT
|
0.40
|
458
|
14
|
[33]
|
|
Zn(salen) (n = 1 – 7)
|
–
|
430 – 450
|
–
|
[34]
|
|
ELC1
|
–
–
|
385
405
|
–
|
[36]
[36]
|
|
ELC2
|
|
|
–
|
[36]
|
|
ELC3
|
–
|
608
|
–
|
[36]
|
|
Pic
|
3.9
|
–
|
–
|
[37]
|
|
PId
|
4.0
|
–
|
–
|
[37]
|
|
BP2-BP4
|
19.2 – 17.0
|
389 – 410
|
–
|
[38]
|
|
BPypc
|
4.2
|
–
|
–
|
[39]
|
|
BPyp3C
|
23.9
|
–
|
–
|
[39]
|
|
Fl. derivative
|
1.1 – 1.4
|
477 – 490
|
13, 13, 11, 9, 14
|
[40]
|
|
DCBPy
|
24
|
–
|
–
|
[42]
|
|
t-Bu (DTCBpy)
|
27.2
|
–
|
–
|
[42]
|
|
TPA-MPS
|
2.11
|
–
|
–
|
[45]
|
|
Ir Complex 5
|
14
|
–
|
–
|
[46]
|
In 2017, Valsange et al. demonstrated a small organic molecule named PY-II ([Figure 20]) which has a simple pyrene core. The resultant study provided that it has excellent
solubility in simple organic solvents and has thermal stability up to 345 °C. The
photoluminance attained for the molecule was 0.9 with bright blue emission close to
450 nm. In addition, the processed non-doped OLED device exhibited blue emission with
CIE coordinates of 0.16 and 0.16. The PE reported was 0.17 lm · W−1, with 0.41 cd/A current efficiency and 202 cd/m2 maximum brightness.[47]
Figure 20 Small organic molecule PY-II.
Bishnoi et al. reported novel non-planar phenothiazine-5-oxides based on the donor,
acceptor, and spacer concept compounds 2a–I ([Figure 21]). The synthesized compounds showed blue and blue-green emission in solution and
in the solid state. The “push-pull” behavior of the donor and acceptor is proved by
DFT and solvatochromic studies. In addition, the compounds also bear thermal stability
in a range of 159 – 302 °C.[48]
Figure 21 Non-planar phenothiazine-5-oxides.
Imide groups containing naphthalimide (NI) compounds (a – f) ([Figure 22]) are very well-known acceptor compounds. So, to develop multiple applications and
to gain attention in the scientific community Gopikrishna et al. developed an NI compound.
These molecules were reported as a member of newly synthesized AIE-active material
compounds and exhibited emission in the blue region. In addition, the scientists also
found their excellent response towards many other applications such as good biocompatibility
and photostability, and also showed a good response in in vitro and in vivo studies
to imaging of cells.[49]
Figure 22 Naphthalimide compounds (a – f).
The new efficient deep blue emitter was reported in the same year, and the compounds
named NPI-PITPA, MeNPI-PITPA, and OMeNPI-PITPA were based on the concept of D–A. These
molecules unveiled deep blue emissions as per the photophysical characterization.
The compound NPI-PITPA exhibited an EQE of 4.60%, a current efficiency of 4.8 cd A−1, and a PE of 4.2 lm · W−1, for MeNPI-PITPA the EQE found was 4.70%, the current efficiency was 5.2 cd A−1 and the PE was 5.1 lm · W−1. The third emitter OMeNPI-PITPA demonstrated an EQE of 4.90%, a current efficiency
of 5.9 cd A−1 and a PE of 5.1 lm · W−1. In addition, the CIE coordinates observed for the materials were (0.15, 0.09) for
NPIPITPA, (0.15, 0.08) for MeNPI-PITPA and (0.15, 0.07) for OMeNP-PITPA at very low
driving voltage. The materials showed blue emission at 338, 441, and 443 nm, respectively.
Besides this, the maximum EQE of doping device based on OMeNPI-PITPA was 19.0%. The
materials were further doped with various molecules to check whether they give more
true color or not, but the color found was not different from the original ones ([Figure 23]).[50]
Figure 23 Materials used for fabrication of the developed blue OLEDs.
Joseph et al. reported one of the methods in which a cyano group was added to increase
EL properties of moieties and they developed five probes ([Figure 24]). From all of them, the compound containing carbazole named triphenylamine units
exhibited positive solvatochromism in the fluorescence spectra. From the PL, it was
observed that the compound reflected blue emission and EQEs of 338 nm with 1.7% (CBza),
441 nm with 2.0% (CBzb), 404 nm with 2.9% (CBzc), 436 nm with 2.8% (CBzd) and 404 nm
with 3.1% (CBze). The EQE expected was that the fluorene derivative having cyano substituents
showed the best EL and the reason is the well-adjusted charge transport emissive layer.[51]
Figure 24 Cyano-functionalized carbazole moieties (CBZa-6).
In the same year, Konidena et al. succeeded in the synthesis of a modified hybridized
local and charge transfer (HLCT) fluorescent TPA-based emitter ([Figure 25]). An OLED using this material showed an EQE of 6.5% with a CIEy value of 0.06. Besides this, the compound exhibited an emission at 432 nm.[52]
Figure 25 Fluorescent TPA-based emitter.
Thanikachalam et al. conducted a study on five new blue emissive D–π–A materials ([Figure 26]) to investigate non-doped OLEDs. Among them, TPA-BDIS displayed a QE of 1.98% along
with CIE coordinates of (0.16, 0.09) and a narrow FHWM (full width at half-maximum)
of 40 nm in the EL spectra. Thus, these values suggested that TPA-BDIS acts as a potential
deep blue emitter. The EQE for Cz-BPIS observed was 2.61% and the radiative rate was
13.6 × 10−6 · s−1. Moreover, the current efficiency was 1.99 cd A−1 and the PE was 1.63 lm · W−1, and a strong emission was observed at 369 nm.[53]
Figure 26 Blue emissive D–π–A materials
One year later in 2018, a one-pot four-component methodology was developed to synthesize
coumarin-linked triazolyl-DHPM. The synthesized compound sufficiently showed fluorescence.
All 10 synthesized compounds exhibited violet-blue light in the visible region. In
addition, the compounds also demonstrated a high yield and the electronic structure
was studied by DFT characterization. As per thermal analysis, the compounds bear stability
up to the temperature range of 0 – 290 °C.[54] However, compared to other core molecules, this molecule is quite weak when it comes
to efficiency. Bala et al. found an electron-deficient core (s-heptazine) for OLED
development ([Figure 27]). This moiety exhibited AIE. Besides this, solid-state molecules showed sky-blue
emissions. They were fabricated by using Hpz-C12 along with various hosts such as
CBP with a 3% dopant concentration. The best CBP-containing device showed a PE of
0.3 lm · W−1, a current efficiency of 0.4 cd/A, and an EQE of 1.6% along with CIE coordinates
of (0.17, 0.08) at a brightness of 100 cd/m2. Hence this device opened a new pathway to broaden the development of AIE-based blue
light emitters.[55]
Figure 27 Hpz-3C12 host.
Ghate et al. published a work on organic phosphor OEt-DPQ (ethoxy) ([Figure 28]) using an acid-catalyzed process, which was further doped with polymethylmethacrylate
at different wt% to check the expected results. The surface morphology and percentage
comparison were assessed by scanning electron microscopy. It was found that the thermal
stability is in the temperature range of 80 – 113.6 °C. The absorption band in UV
was exhibited in the range of 260 – 340 nm, whereas PL was found at 432 nm. Thus,
the Pl value indicated the emission of blue light in the visible region. As per the
chromaticity diagram, CIE coordinates were poisoned at (0.159, 0.019). Hence this
emitter was found to be capable enough to be used as a blue emitter in OLED.[56]
Figure 28 Organic phosphor OEt-DPQ.
Efforts have been devoted by Konidena et al. to report a star-shaped triazine–perylene
conjugate ([Figure 29]). As solubility was an issue since starting for emitting materials, the triazine–perylene
molecule (PerTz1) has good solubility due to its propeller shape. According to the
DFT studies, it was observed a change in energy levels of HUMO and LUMO. Additionally,
these star-shaped molecules exhibited bright greenish-blue fluorescence with high
quantum yield. According to the data of luminance (L
max 5,561 cd m−2), it was proved that the designed star-shaped molecules promote charge migration
along with better charge recombination to improve efficiency. The EQE observed for
the synthesized molecule was 2.57%.[57]
Figure 29 Star-shaped triazine–perylene conjugate (PerTz1).
Sharma et al. synthesized star-shaped TPE (Tx1) and TPAN (Tx2, Tx3) truxene molecules
([Figure 30]). The molecules were prepared via Suzuki and Sonogashira reactions. The reported
TPE-substituted truxenes exhibited AIE behavior, whereas the TPAN-substituted truxene
derivative showed an ACQ (aggregation caused quenching) effect in THF as well as in
water because of π–π stacking. Also, TPAN molecules displayed HTS as the 10% weight
loss temperature is more than 400 °C. EL properties of truxenes were investigated
in solution-processed and vacuum-deposited OLEDs. The reported non-doped OLED based
on TPAN truxene moiety Tx3 showed λmax of 360 nm, 3.8% EQE, and a maximum brightness of 7,000 cd/m2.[58]
Figure 30 Star-shaped TPAN (Tx3) derivative.
Siddiqui et al. introduced a donor–acceptor derivative where acridone acts as an acceptor
and carbazole acts as a donor (AcCBz) ([Figure 31]). The band gap △E
ST found was as low as 0.17 eV, which was favorable for TADF compounds. Furthermore,
the emission exhibited at 465 nm and the compounds were found to be efficient for
blue light TADF in OLEDs. The compounds were blended with poly-vinyl carbazole in
a 1 : 7 (W/W) ratio to check the efficiency. The efficiency found for the compounds
blended with poly-vinyl carbazole was very high compared to the plain molecule. The
current efficiency found was 65 Cd · A−1 at high luminance of 9,800 Cd/m2 for the device. So, it was observed that the acridone-carbazole derivatives offered
EL as an undoped TADF greenish blue emitter and a blue emitter when doped in PVK.[59]
Figure 31 Greenish blue TADF emitter (AcCBz).
Tagare et al. reported two-star-shaped fluorescent PI fluorophores PIMCFTPA and PIPCFTPA
([Figure 32]) with a D–π–A structure. These two fluorophores exhibited an excellent transition
temperature and HTS with decomposition temperature up to 377 °C. The doped device
made up of these molecules exhibited bluish-green emission at 436 nm with high efficiency
(current efficiency of 6.58 Cd/A, PE of 5.91 lm/W and 3.62% EQE at low turn-on voltage
of 2.83 V).[60]
Figure 32 PI fluorophores PIMCFTPA and PIPCFTPA.
Venkatramaiah et al. introduced three carbazole-based molecules with the D–π–A structure
([Figure 33]). The compound exhibited excellent quantum yield with a different color. Among them,
Cbz-Pth showed sky-blue color emission at 481 nm in the solid state. Besides this,
the OLED was fabricated with the three-layer device using Cbz-Pth molecules. The fabricated
molecule showed 4.1% EQE and a brightness close to about 73,915 cd/m2.[61]
Figure 33 CBz-Pth molecule.
Later in 2019, Manohara et al. gave their devotion to reporting cyanopyridine derivatives
via Williamson ether synthesis. The molecules were further reacted with chalcone via
an aldol condensation reaction to check the capacity of the molecule. All three synthesized
fluorophores BZnCY, BZnCYBR, and BZnCYVY ([Figure 34]) revealed an absorption band close to the 274 – 355 nm region and also exhibited
blue emission in the 412 – 438 nm range. The energy gap reported as per the CV result
was between 1.37 and 2.12 eV. As per the collected data, the derivatives can be used
in optoelectronic devices such as OLEDs.[62]
Figure 34 BZnCY, BZnCYBR and BZnCYVY fluorophores.
Kadam et al. introduced substituted indol carbazole derivatives Cbz-a and Cbz-b ([Figure 35]). As per the DFT studies, it was found that Cbz-a was more planar than Cbz-b. Both
of the compounds showed significant change in color under long UV-light exposure and
the absorption band was found near 353 nm.[63]
Figure 35 Carbazole derivatives Cbz-a and Cbz-b.
In the same year, two new blue PI-based luminophores DPIPOBn and DPITBOBn ([Figure 36]) were reported and both luminophores emitted intense blue color in the solution
and solid phase. Then, the synthesized compounds were fabricated in OLEDs to test
whether they act as emissive materials or not. Each device exhibited emissions near
around 380 – 395 nm under UV light. The CIE values reported were (x, y) (0.16, 0.09 or 0.10). The DPITBOn-fabricated device demonstrated a PE of 0.5 lm/W,
a current efficiency of 1.2 cd/A, and an EQE of 1.9%.[64]
Figure 36 DPIPOBn and DPITBOBn luminophores.
Kajjam et al. successfully synthesized novel TPI-based luminophores (TP 1–TP 4) ([Figure 37]). It was found that the designed molecules showed fluorescence in the range of 380 – 420 nm.[65]
Figure 37 TPI-based luminophores.
Jayabharthi et al. developed new blue-emitting bis-PI derivatives such as NPIBN, CNPIBP,
and CNPIBN. These molecules exhibited high PL quantum yield (Фs/f: NPIBNO-0.75/0.68, CNPIBP-0.85/0.76 and CNPIBN-0.90/0.88). Besides this, the non-doped/doped
device based on CNPIBN molecule displayed a maximum efficiency of 4.96/5.4%, a current
efficiency of 7.46/7.56 cd A−1 and a PE of 6.85/6.91 lm · W−1 at low turn-on voltage (3.5/3.8 V). In addition, non-doped devices based on the (D–π–A)
moiety ([Figure 38]), TPNCN-TPA and TPN-Cz, showed emission at 420 and 435 nm with internal quantum
efficiency values of 10.1%, and 11.6%, respectively, which is attributed to the charge
transfer component from cyano substitution. Further, ηex 2.01%, ηC 3.89 Cd/A, ηP 3.15 lm/W and 2.32%, ηC 4.0 Cd/A, ηP 3.42 lm/W were observed for TPNCN-TPA and TPN-Cz, respectively.[66]
Figure 38 PI derivatives TPNCN-TPA and TPNCN-Cz.
Bala et al. introduced new compounds based on the TP-PA discotic moiety ([Figure 39]). The fabricated doped device (TP-PA8a) showed a QE of 2.1%, 1.2 lm · W−1 power efficiency, and 2.0 cd A−1 current efficiency. Among all the devices, it was found that the TP-PA8 acts as a
potential candidate for application in semiconducting OLED materials.[67]
Figure 39 TP-PA discotic dimer.
Awasthi et al. synthesized an acridone-dinaphthylamine derivative (AcNpH) ([Figure 40]) to investigate its property as a blue TADF material. The synthesized compound showed
fluorescence and the emission was observed in greenish blue light at 550 nm. The energy
gap found was 0.3 eV and the OLED based on the synthesized compound exhibited nearly
17,000 cd/m2 at 25 mA/cm2.[68]
Figure 40 Acridone dinaphthylamine derivative (AcNpH).
Once again in the same year, four more deep blue emitter compounds PNSPI, ANSPI, PSPINC
and ASPINC ([Figure 41]) were reported. Among the four synthesized compounds, PSPINC-based non-doped devices
showed blue emission at 476 nm. The ASPINC-based non-doped device exhibited excellent
performances, such as current efficiency (ηc 12.13 cd/A), EQE (ηex 6.79%), PE (ηp 5.98 lm · W−1), and CIE (0.15, 0.17) at 3.15 V.[69]
Figure 41 ANSPI, PNSPI, ASPINC and PSPINC moieties.
Mahadik et al. designed a series of quinoxaline derivatives ([Figure 42]). They synthesized nine 2,3-di(thiophene-2-yl) quinoxaline-based amine derivatives
and characterized them by standard spectroscopic techniques. All the molecules showed
an absorption spectrum in the range of 390 – 461 nm. Among them, eight molecules Qe-a
exhibited an emission maximum within 465 – 566 nm for yellow-blue light. In addition,
the HOMO and LUMO values were found in the range of −4.90 to 5.70 eV and −3.10 to
−3.36 eV, respectively.[70]
Figure 42 Quinoxaline molecules Qe-a.
For the pyrene-substituted oxadiazole moiety, Najare et al. developed a new molecule
with proper hole and electron transfer ([Figure 43]). Differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis studies proved
that the molecule has excellent stability for application in optoelectronics in the
range of 204 – 366 °C. The estimated HOMO and LUMO values found for the compounds
were in the range of −5.67 411 to −8.27 307 eV and −1.886 383 to −5.93 044 eV, respectively.[71]
Figure 43 Pyrene-substituted oxadiazole moiety.
Ravindra et al. reported an AIE-based fluorescent imidazole molecule AIE moiety ([Figure 44]). It was found from powder X-ray diffraction that the mechanofluorochromic properties
of the compound was reversible under an external force just because of a decrease
in crystallinity. Due to this reason, the moiety revealed bright cyan-blue luminescence
in the solid state with excellent QE. The absorption found for the molecule was at
365 nm under UV illumination. As per all the outcome results, it was proved that the
molecule with good AIE was considered a promising candidate for OLEDs as well as latent
fingerprints for visualization applications.[72]
Figure 44 AIE-based fluorescent imidazole molecule (AIE moiety).
Three fluorophores were also published meanwhile ([Figure 45]) and all the emitters exhibited a deep blue emission with brilliant device efficiency.
The maximum luminance (L
max) was found to be 994 cd/m2 and emission was observed at 442 nm. The observed current efficiency was 2.6 cd/A,
with a PE of 1.0 lm/W and an EQE of 3.2% at the brightness of 100 cd/m2 for TBIMPTPA. These results verified that the molecules prepared from the concept
of D–A are favorable for blue OLEDs.[73]
Figure 45 Fluorophore molecules BIMTPA, DBIMTPA, TBIMPTP and DBIPTPA.
Similarly, in 2020 three bright blue color bipolar fluorophores BIPTPA, DBIPTPA, and
TBIPTPA were designed ([Figure 45]). The device based on DBIPTPA reflected exceptional electroluminance performance
among all three. The maximum luminance noted for the device was 495 cd/m2, with an emission at 471 nm from the PL data and the EQE noted was 2.5% along with
0.8 cd/A current efficiency.[74]
In the same year, Patil et al. published their work on a TADF-based IDFL molecule
([Figure 46]). The IDFL-2DPA molecule was further synthesized by attaching two diphenylamine
(DPA) units. The reported molecule showed a large singlet–singlet energy gap of 0.45 eV
for the TADF one. The fabricated IDFL-2DPA device showed an initial luminance L
max, of 48,900 cd/m2 and exhibited an EQE of 5.7%. The emission observed was at 461 nm for the same molecule
in THF solution.[75]
Figure 46 IDFL-2DPA probe.
Also, it was in the same year when Karuppusamy and Kannan developed three novel pyrazoline
skeleton donor–acceptor molecules. Among them, the two compounds PP-OCH3 and PP-Br ([Figure 47]) exhibited blue and sky-blue emissions, respectively. The absorption for PP-OCH3 and PP-Br at 416 nm and 439 nm, respectively, were confirmed by fluorescence spectrometry.
The derivatives have excellent thermal stability as both compounds demonstrated thermal
stability at 325 °C and 291 °C, respectively. Besides this, the HOMO and LUMO energy
gap observed for PP-Br and PP-OCH3 was 3.111 and 3.274 eV, respectively.[76]
Figure 47 Pyrazoline skeletons PP-OCH3 and PP-Br.
In 2021, two new blue emissive materials were designed ([Figure 48]). The synthesized molecules NSPI-DVP and CNSPI-DVP were capable enough to show AIE
and free-of-concentration quenching in film. Both molecules showed excellent emission
in the color range of blue and green. The fabricated non-doped device based on CNSPI-DVP
unveiled blue emission at 427 nm with CIE coordinates of (x, y) (0.14, 0.13). However, the device showed excellent electroluminance performance
compared with NSPI-DVP with a superior EQE of 5.23%. The doped device fabricated by
CNSPI-DVP improved the efficiency and EQE noted after doping was 9.81%, with a CE
of 7.56 cd A−1 and a PE of 6.81 lm · W−1.[77]
Figure 48 Blue emissive materials CNSPI-DVP and NSPI-DVP.
Dixit et al. came up with a huge stroke by developing seven different bipolar PI derivatives
PI1 – 6 ([Figure 49]). The properties found for the reported molecules were satisfying in the case of
high fluorescence quantum yield (> 90%). The compounds synthesized showed an emission
maximum at 391 nm for PI1, 381 – 414 nm for compound PI2, 403 – 414 nm for compound
PI3, and 396 – 429 nm for compound PI4. Besides that, the oxidation potential was
found in the range of 0.96 – 1.57%. In addition, the EQE found was about 3.2% for
all compounds.[78]
Figure 49 Bipolar PI derivatives PI1 – PI7.
Sharma et al. designed luminogens having PI, carbazole, and cyano functional groups.
The MIPCN and DPICN emitters ([Figure 50]) were polar and exhibited very good thermal stability. It was discovered that these
compounds exhibited a very good blue shift in the presence of an acid. An OLED device
based on MPICN showed the best performance among all. The device was capable of exhibiting
a PE of 1.4 lm/W, a current efficiency of 3.2 cd/A and an increased EQE of 1.8% at
100 cd/m2. Besides this, the violet bluish emission was found near 407 – 418 nm in the solid
state.[79]
Figure 50 MIPCN and DPICN luminogens.
Four imidazole derivatives BIPOCz, BIPTOCz, BITBOCz and BIFOCz were synthesized in
the same year. The reported fluorophores show a PL quantum yield (PLQY) of 59%. Other
than this, the CIE coordinates observed for y were less than 0.08. However, the BIPOCz molecule-based OLED device ([Figure 51]) exhibited an EQE of 1.9% along with CIE coordinates of (0.17, 0.07), and also showed
emission near 367 – 460 nm (solid).[80]
Figure 51 BIPOCz molecule.
Vasylieva et al. synthesized three novel conjugated organic TADF molecules with a
D–A–D structure ([Figure 52]). The absorption band of the Conj-a TADF molecule was found in the range of 400 – 420 nm.
But the fabricated device, Conj-a molecule, exhibited luminance of up to 22,900 cd/m2. The EQE noted for the device was 5.2%.[81]
Figure 52 Conj-a TADF molecule.
Najare et al. synthesized three oxadiazole derivatives ([Figure 53]). All devices were studied in detail using optoelectronic properties. Among all
the optoelectronic properties the synthesized moieties CHEM-a and CHEM-c have good
thermal properties, which was confirmed by the glass transition temperature (T
g). The band gap value observed for these moieties was in the range of 2.70 – 3.11 eV
with high Stokes shift values of 5018 – 9143 cm−1. In addition, all the compounds exhibited excellent thermal stability and the temperature
noted was more than 300 °C with 5% decomposition.[82]
Figure 53 CHEM-a, CHEM-b and CHEM-c.
Kumar et al. synthesized fluorescent derivatives based on a core called coumarin thiophene
fluorescent tags (CTFTs) ([Figure 54]). The PL properties of the CTFTa molecule (R = H, R1 = Cl) showed a strong excitation at 407 nm. The bandgap of CTFTa is 3.04 eV and for
CTFTb it is 3.29 eV.[83]
Figure 54 CTFT fluorescent derivatives.
In 2022, Bahadur et al. demonstrated two potential isomers BPy-pDTC and BPy-mDTC ([Figure 55]). Both of the TADF emitters exhibited more than 90% PLQY. BPy-pDTC-containing OLED
devices provided a high EQE of 25% with a narrow emission of 456 nm. In addition,
CIE coordinates noticed were (0.14, 0.13).[84]
Figure 55 Potential isomers BPy-mDTC and BPy-pDTC.
Two new bipolar molecules 4-PIMCFTPA and 4-BICFTPA were reported ([Figure 56]). The doped device fabricated with 4-PIMCFTPA fluorophore exhibited a maximum PE
of 0.3 lm/W with 1.7% EQE. The CIE coordinates detected were (0.17, 0.06).[85]
Figure 56 4-PIMCFTPA and 4-BICFTPA fluorophores.
Proper charge transfer was an issue for a long time and dipolar PI derivatives (PI-1,
PI-2 and PI-3) properly optimize the charge balance. So, by changing the position
and number of PI probes ([Figure 57]) Thomas et al. designed a molecule that can balance the intramolecular charge between
molecules. From all three PI emitters, the device fabricated by using a molecule linked
at the p-position of the C2 phenyl ring (PI-2) showed CIE values of (0.16, 0.08) with an EQE of 1.4% and a CE
of 1.0 Cd/A. PI-1 and PI-3 showed EQEs of 1.0% and 0.7%, CEs of 0.6 and 0.6 Cd/A and
CIEs of 0.17, 0.09 and 0.17, 0.11, respectively.[86]
Figure 57 Dipolar PI probe.
Very recently, three core acceptors PHBISN, PTBISN, and m-CFBISN were reported ([Figure 58]). All compounds synthesized have a wide energy band gap of more than 3 eV. The molecule
PTBISN was fabricated in OLEDs and exhibited an EQE of 1.5%. The CIE coordinates observed
for the same device were (0.15, 0.08). The y value exactly matched with the standard value defined by the National Television
System Committee.[87]
Figure 58 Core acceptors PHBISN, PTBISN, and m-CFBISN.
In the year 2022, a few of the best blue OLED emitting molecules with outstanding
photoluminance and electroluminance properties are reported from India. By seeing
this kind of development in blue OLEDs, particularly in India, and as per the experts
from the display industry, the next 15 years for the blue OLEDs will be bullish. Also,
this significant device will be the next player of light technology and it will have
great influence directly on improving the economic growth of India. Here are the significant
results of a number of molecules reported from the year 2017 to 2022 ([Table 4]). This table includes lifetime, EQE and blue light emission values.
Table 4 Performance of blue emitting materials and λmax
|
Name
|
EQE (%)
|
λmax (nm)
|
Lifetime (ns)
|
Ref.
|
|
NPI-PITPA
|
4.60
|
338
|
–
|
[50]
|
|
MeNPI-PITPA
|
4.70
|
441
|
–
|
[50]
|
|
OMeNPI-PITPA
|
4.90
|
443
|
–
|
[50]
|
|
CBza
|
1.7
|
400
|
–
|
[51]
|
|
CBzb
|
2.0
|
400
|
–
|
[51]
|
|
CBzc
|
2.9
|
404
|
–
|
[51]
|
|
CBzd
|
2.8
|
436
|
–
|
[51]
|
|
CBze
|
3.1
|
404
|
–
|
[51]
|
|
Flue. TPA
|
6.5
|
432
|
1.33, 3.23
|
[52]
|
|
TPA-BDIS
|
2.61
|
369
|
–
|
[53]
|
|
HP2-3C12
|
1.6
|
450
|
–
|
[55]
|
|
OEt-DpQ
|
–
|
432
|
–
|
[56]
|
|
PerTz1
|
2.57
|
–
|
–
|
[57]
|
|
TPAN(Tx3)
|
3.8
|
389 – 410
|
–
|
[58]
|
|
AcCBz
|
–
|
465
|
11.5
|
[59]
|
|
PIMCFTPA
|
3.62
|
436
|
1.70
|
[60]
|
|
CBz-Pth
|
4.1
|
481
|
Solution: 11.2
Film: 10
|
[61]
|
|
BZnCy, BZnCyBR, BZnCyVY
|
–
|
412 – 438
|
–
|
[62]
|
|
DPITBOBn
|
1.9
|
–
|
–
|
[64]
|
|
TP1-TPI4
|
–
|
380 – 420
|
–
|
[65]
|
|
TPNCN-Cz
|
11.6
|
435
|
4.3
|
[66]
|
|
TPNCN-TPA
|
10.1
|
420
|
5.4
|
[66]
|
|
TP-PA
|
2.1
|
454
|
4.10
|
[67]
|
|
AcNpH
|
–
|
550
|
Air: 11.7
In N2: 18.6
|
[68]
|
|
PSPINC
|
–
|
476
|
–
|
[69]
|
|
ASPINC
|
6.79
|
430 – 450
|
–
|
[69]
|
|
Qe-a
|
–
|
465 – 566
|
–
|
[70]
|
|
TBIMTA
|
3.2
|
442
|
–
|
[73]
|
|
DBIPTPA
|
2.5
|
471
|
–
|
[74]
|
|
IDFL-2DPA
|
5.7
|
461
|
13.5
|
[75]
|
|
PPOCH3
|
–
|
416
|
2.33
|
[76]
|
|
PPBr
|
–
|
439
|
1.74
|
[76]
|
|
NSPI-DVP
|
5.23
|
427
|
–
|
[77]
|
|
CNSPI-DVP
|
9.81
|
427
|
–
|
[77]
|
|
PI4
|
3.2
|
429
|
ACN solvent: 2.08
|
[78]
|
|
MPICN
|
1.8
|
407 – 418
|
9.53
|
[79]
|
|
BIPOCz
|
1.9
|
367 – 460
|
–
|
[80]
|
|
Conj.-a
|
5.4
|
400 – 420
|
15.3 – 15.8
|
[81]
|
|
CTFTa
|
–
|
407
|
–
|
[83]
|
|
BPy-pDTC
|
25
|
456
|
–
|
[84]
|
|
4-PIMCFTPA
|
1.7
|
439
|
–
|
[85]
|
|
PTBISN
|
1.5
|
429
|
–
|
[87]
|
