Multidisciplinary Team Care: Adolescent Breast

Abstract

Poland syndrome, tuberous breast deformity, gynecomastia, and macromastia are among the most common breast disorders affecting adolescents. While the etiology and physical manifestations may differ between each condition, they all may impose psychosocial stress necessitating evaluation and treatment. A multidisciplinary team is essential to providing comprehensive care specific to an adolescent population. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss common adolescent breast deformities necessitating plastic surgeon involvement, and the components of a successful multidisciplinary adolescent breast care team.

Keywords

adolescent - breast - multidisciplinary care - plastic surgery - macromastia - Poland syndrome - tuberous breast deformity - gynecomastia

Publication History

Article published online:
31 March 2025

• References

• 1 Braun TL, Kaufman MG, Hernandez C, Monson LA. Shared medical appointments for adolescent breast reduction. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (03) 253-258
• 2 Kikuchi DS, Mustin DE, Ghanouni A, Walsh MD. A review of pediatric macromastia etiology and indications for reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 77: 209-217
• 3 Massey GG, Firriolo JM, Nuzzi LC. et al. Risk factors associated with severe macromastia among adolescents and young women. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (06) 1212-1218
• 4 Breast and Labial Surgery in Adolescents. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. January 2017. Accessed December 1, 2024 at: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2017/01/breast-and-labial-surgery-in-adolescents
• 5 Pryor LS, Lehman Jr. JAJ, Workman MC. Disorders of the Female Breast in the Pediatric Age Group. Disorders of the female breast in the pediatric age group. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (01) , suppl): 50e-60e
• 6 Laituri CA, Garey CL, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD, Gittes GK, Snyder CL. Treatment of adolescent gynecomastia. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (03) 650-654
• 7 Losee JE, Serletti JM, Kreipe RE, Caldwell EH. Reduction mammaplasty in patients with bulimia nervosa. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39 (05) 443-446
• 8 Cerrato F, Webb ML, Rosen H. et al. The impact of macromastia on adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (02) e339-e346
• 9 Kinsella Jr C, Landfair A, Rottgers SA. et al. The psychological burden of idiopathic adolescent gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 1-7
• 10 McCranie A, Lee AD, Cyrus C. et al. Evaluation of the impact of physical therapy on patients with macromastia seeking breast reduction surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44 (12) NP862-NP869
• 11 LaRosa KN, Stern M, Lynn C. et al. Provider perceptions' of a patient navigator for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27 (11) 4091-4098
• 12 Berry LL, Rock BL, Smith Houskamp B, Brueggeman J, Tucker L. Care coordination for patients with complex health profiles in inpatient and outpatient settings. Mayo Clin Proc 2013; 88 (02) 184-194
• 13 Costanzo PR, Pacenza NA, Aszpis SM. et al. Clinical and etiological aspects of gynecomastia in adult males: a multicenter study. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018: 8364824
• 14 Chun YS, Schwartz MA, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Carty MJ. Body mass index as a predictor of postoperative complications in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (02) 228e-233e
• 15 Handschin AE, Bietry D, Hüsler R, Banic A, Constantinescu M. Surgical management of gynecomastia--a 10-year analysis. World J Surg 2008; 32 (01) 38-44
• 16 Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Friedman JD, Echo A. Complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (04) 761-767
• 17 Tafti D, Cecava ND. Poland Syndrome. StatPearls: 2025. . Accessed February 5, 2025 at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532259/
• 18 Jordan SW, Corcoran J. Considerations in breast augmentation in the adolescent patient. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27 (01) 67-71
• 19 Pinsolle V, Chichery A, Grolleau JL, Chavoin JP. Autologous fat injection in Poland's syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (07) 784-791
• 20 Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, Park CS, Lee RK, Park HY. Endoscopy-assisted muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvesting for partial breast reconstruction. BMC Surg 2020; 20 (01) 192
• 21 Ma JX, Li B, Xia YC. et al. Latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer through endoscopic approach combined with the implant after tissue expansion for breast reconstruction of mastectomy patients. BMC Surg 2022; 22 (01) 10
• 22 Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas D, Lambrinaki N, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L. Aesthetic reconstruction of the tuberous breast deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (04) 1099-1108 , discussion 1109
• 23 Nordt CA, DiVasta AD. Gynecomastia in adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008; 20 (04) 375-382
• 24 Johnson RE, Murad MH. Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84 (11) 1010-1015
• 25 Malhotra AK, Amed S, Bucevska M, Bush KL, Arneja JS. Do adolescents with gynecomastia require routine evaluation by endocrinology?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (01) 9e-16e
• 26 Choi BS, Lee SR, Byun GY, Hwang SB, Koo BH. The characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (05) 1011-1021
• 27 Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51 (01) 48-52
• 28 Schröder L, Rudlowski C, Walgenbach-Brünagel G, Leutner C, Kuhn W, Walgenbach KJ. Surgical strategies in the treatment of gynecomastia grade I-II: the combination of liposuction and subcutaneous mastectomy provides excellent patient outcome and satisfaction. Breast Care (Basel) 2015; 10 (03) 184-188
• 29 Tashkandi M, Al-Qattan MM, Hassanain JM, Hawary MB, Sultan M. The surgical management of high-grade gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (01) 17-20 , discussion 21
• 30 Innocenti A, Melita D, Dreassi E. Incidence of complications for different approaches in gynecomastia correction: a systematic review of the literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (03) 1025-1041
• 31 McNamara CT, Nuzzi LC, Firriolo JM. et al. Complications and quality of life following gynecomastia correction in adolescents and young men. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (06) 1062e-1070e
• 32 Wolfswinkel EM, Lemaine V, Weathers WM, Chike-Obi CJ, Xue AS, Heller L. Hyperplastic breast anomalies in the female adolescent breast. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27 (01) 49-55
• 33 Koltz PF, Sbitany H, Myers RP, Shaw RB, Patel N, Girotto JA. Reduction mammaplasty in the adolescent female: the URMC experience. Int J Surg 2011; 9 (03) 229-232
• 34 Tanas Y, Tanas J. Comparative outcomes of superomedial and inferior pedicles in breast reduction and mastopexy: a meta-analysis of 5123 breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024;
• 35 Morrison KA, Vernon R, Choi M, Karp NS. Quantifying surgical complications for reduction mammaplasty in adolescents. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (03) 376e-383e
• 36 Losee JE, Caldwell EH, Serletti JM. Secondary reduction mammaplasty: is using a different pedicle safe?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (05) 1004-1008 , discussion 1009–1010
• 37 Haddad EN, Obeid R, Marlar R. et al. Secondary reduction mammaplasty techniques and outcomes: Cleveland Clinic experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 97: 138-146
• 38 Figueroa AE, Yau A, Lentskevich MA, Termanini K, Gosain AK. Timing of pediatric breast reduction and insurance coverage: single-institution retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12 (09) e6147
• 39 McCranie A, Desjardins H, Mathes D, Kaoutzanis C. Should physical therapy be an insurance requirement for patients seeking a breast reduction?. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43 (09) NP713-NP714
• 40 Collins ED, Kerrigan CL, Kim M. et al. The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (05) 1556-1566