Endoscopy 1999; 31(8): 611-614
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-64
Special Topic
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

4. Appropriateness of Gastroscopy: Atypical Chest Pain [1]

J.-P. Vader *, T. Larequi-Lauber *, F. Froehlich **, B. Burnand *, R. W. Dubois ***, J.-J. Gonvers **
  • * Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • ** Policlinique Médicale Universitaire, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • *** Protocare Sciences, Santa Monica, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

Introduction

Atypical chest pain (ACP) can be defined as “chest pain in patients with no objective evidence of coronary heart disease” [1]. In the USA, about 30 % of the 600 000 patients who undergo coronary angiography every year for presumed cardiac pain are found to have no abnormality of the coronary arteries and are referred to a gastroenterologist for esophageal evaluation [2]. 90 000 - 200 000 new cases of ACP are diagnosed every year in the USA [2] [3] [4] .

In November 1998, a multidisciplinary European expert panel convened in Lausanne, Switzerland, to discuss and develop criteria for the appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy, a widely-used procedure, regarded as highly accurate and safe. The RAND appropriateness method was chosen for this purpose, because it allows the development of appropriateness criteria based on published evidence and supplemented by explicit expert opinion. A detailed description of the RAND appropriateness method, including the literature search process [5], and of the whole process, as well as the global results of the panel [6], are published as separate articles in this issue of the Journal. The literature review was based on a systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library conducted up to the end of 1997 and completed with some key articles published in 1998. Updating and revision of the literature review is currently ongoing.

This article presents 1. the literature review on this question that was provided to panelists for study and comment prior to the panel to support their ratings of appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the diagnosis and handling of atypical chest pain; 2. an overview of the main panel results on that question; 3. a summary of the published evidence and of the panel based appropriateness criteria.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's esophagus as identified sources of chest pain are covered in companion articles [7] [8] .

1 The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE, Lausanne, Switzerland)

References

  • 1 Just R J, Castell D O. Chest pain of undetermined origin.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Amer. 1994;  4 731-746
  • 2 Richter J E, Bradley L A, Catell D O. Esophageal chest pain: current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.  Ann Intern Med. 1989;  110 66-78
  • 3 Achem S R, Kolts B E, Wears R, Burton L, Richter J E. Chest pain associated with nutcracker esophagus: a preliminary study of the role of gastroesophageal reflux.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;  88 187-192
  • 4 Richter J E. Overview of diagnostic testing or chest pain of unknown origin.  Am J Med. 1992;  92 41-45S
  • 5 Vader J P, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, et al. The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Project and methods.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 672-678
  • 6 Vader J P, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, et al. The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Conclusions and WWW site.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 687-694
  • 7 Bochud M, Gonvers J J, Vader J P, et al. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Gastroesophageal reflux disease.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 596-603
  • 8 Bochud M, Gonvers J J, Vader J P, et al. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Barrett's esophagus.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 604-610
  • 9 Fruergaard P, Launbjerg J, Hesse B, et al. The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction.  Europ Heart J. 1996;  17 1028-1034
  • 10 Panju A, Farkouh M E, Sackett D L, et al. Outcome of patients discharged from a coronary care unit with a diagnosis of “chest pain not yet diagnosed”.  CMAJ. 1996;  155 541-546
  • 11 Snape W JJ. Managing the patient with atypical chest pain.  Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1997;  32 159-173
  • 12 Boivin M, Paterson W G. Management of complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease: atypical chest pain.  Can J Gasteoenterol. 1998;  11 91-93B
  • 13 Rao S S, Gregersen H, Hayek B, et al. Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus.  Ann Intern Med. 1996;  124 950-958
  • 14 Anderson K A. Stress induces alteration of esophageal pressures in healthy volunteers and non-cardiac chest pain patients.  Dig Dis Sci. 1989;  34 83-91
  • 15 Clouse R E, Lustman P J. Psychiatric illness and contraction abnormalities of the esophagus.  N Engl J Med. 1983;  309 1337-1342
  • 16 Beitman B D, Basha I, Flaker G, et al. Atypical or nonanginal chest pain. Panic disorder or coronary artery disease?.  Arch Intern Med. 1987;  147 1548-1552
  • 17 Launbjerg J, Fruergaard P, Hesse B, et al. Long-term risk of death, cardiac events and recurrent chest pain in patients with acute chest pain of different origin.  Cardiology. 1996;  87 60-66
  • 18 Davies H A. Anginal pain of esophageal origin: clinical presentation, prevalence, and prognosis.  Am J Med. 1992;  92 5-10S
  • 19 Browning T H. Diagnosis of chest pain of esophageal origin. A guideline of the Patient Care Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association.  Dig Dis Sci. 1990;  35 289-293
  • 20 Schofield P M, Bennett D H, Whorwell P J, et al. Exertional gastro-oesophageal reflux: a mechanism for symptoms in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms.  Brit Med J Clin Res. 1987;  294 1459-1461
  • 21 Mellow M H, Simpson A G, Watt L, et al. Esophageal acid perfusion in coronary artery disease. Induction of myocardial ischemia.  Gastroenterology. 1983;  85 306-312
  • 22 Davies H A, Jones D B, Rhodes J, Newcombe R G. Angina-like esophageal pain: differentiation from cardiac pain by history.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1985;  7 477-481
  • 23 Hewson E G, Sinclair J W, Dalton C B, Richter J E. Twenty-four-hour esophageal pH-monitoring: the most useful test for evaluating noncardiac chest pain.  Am J Med. 1991;  90 576-583
  • 24 Fass R. The clinical and economic value of a short course of omeprazole in patients with noncardiac chest pain.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  115 42-49
  • 25 Baron T H, Richter J E. The use of esophageal function tests.  Adv Int Med. 1993;  38 361-386
  • 26 Paterson W G, Abdollah H, Beck I T, Da Costa R L. Ambulatory esophageal manometry, pH-metry, and Holter ECG monitoring in patients with atypical chest pain.  Dig Dis Sci. 1993;  38 795-802
  • 27 Achem S R, Kolts B E. Current medical therapy for esophageal motility disorders.  Am J Med. 1992;  92 98-105S

1 The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE, Lausanne, Switzerland)

Dr. John-Paul Vader

IUMSP

Bugnon 17

CH-1005 Lausanne

Switzerland

Phone: + 41-21-3144954

Email: John-Paul.Vader@hospvd.ch

    >