Am J Perinatol 2000; Volume 17(Number 05): 233-236
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-10003
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL VERSUS ULTRASOUND ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT

Aboulfazl Mehdizadeh, Reza Alaghehbandan, M.D.,and Hayedeh Horsan
  • Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2000 (online)

ABSTRACT

A prospective study was conducted of the accuracy of fetal weight estimation comparing clinical and ultrasound estimation with actual birth weight in 200 Iranian pregnant women. The results showed that there was statistically significant difference between clinical estimate of fetal weight and actual birth weight, as well as between ultrasound estimation and actual birth weight. The mean error of clinical estimation was 101 g, or 32 g/kg, for a 3.2% error. The error of ultrasound in the same population was 141 g, or 45 g/kg, for a 4.5% error. Analysis of these data revealed statistically significant difference between the mean error of clinical estimation and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Our study indicates that the mean clinical estimate of fetal weight is equal to ultrasound for the estimation of fetal weight in our population. This has important implications for developing countries where there is a lack of technologically advanced ultrasound machines capable of performing sophisticated functions like fetal weight estimation.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Insler V, Bernstein D, Rikover M, Segah T. Estimation of fetal weight in utero by simple external palpation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1967;  90 292-293
  • 2 Ong H C, Sen D K. Clinical estimation of fetal weight.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1972;  112 877-880
  • 3 Warsof S L, Gohari P, Berkowitz R L, Hobbins J C. The estimation of fetal weight by computer assisted analysis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1977;  128 881-892
  • 4 Patterson R M. Estimation of fetal weight during labor.  Obstet Gynecol . 1985;  65 330-332
  • 5 Watson W J, Soisson A P, Harlass F E. Estimated weight of the term fetus.  J Reprod Med . 1988;  33 369-371
  • 6 Hanretty K P, Neilson J P, Fleming J EE. Re-evaluation of clinical estimation of fetal weight: a comparison with ultrasound.  J Obstet Gynaecol . 1990;  10 199-201
  • 7 Bossak W S, Spellacy W N. Accuracy of estimating fetal weight by abdominal palpation.  J Reprod Med . 1972;  9 58
  • 8 Raman S, Urquhart R, Yusof M. Clinical versus ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.  Aus NZ J Obstet Gynaecol . 1992;  32 196-199
  • 9 Ott W J. Clinical application of fetal weight determination by real-time ultrasound measurements.  Obstet Gynecol . 1981;  57 758-762
  • 10 Timor-Tritsch I E, Itskovitz J, Brandes J M. Estimation of fetal weight by real-time sonography.  Obstet Gynecol . 1981;  57 653-656
  • 11 Hadlock F P, Harrist R B, Carpenter R J. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight.  Radiology . 1984;  150 535-540
  • 12 Watson W J, Benson W L. Vaginal delivery for the selected frank breech infant at term.  Obstet Gynecol . 1984;  64 638-640
  • 13 Warsof S L, Wolf P, Coulehan J. Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.  Obstet Gynecol . 1986;  67 569-573
    >