Endoscopy 2000; 32(11): 850-852
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8081
DDW Report
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Esophageal Motility Disorders and Strictures

H.-D. Allescher
  • Dept. of Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Achalasia

Pneumatic dilation is the initial treatment of first choice in patients with achalasia. To compare different treatment alternatives in patients with achalasia, four different strategies (laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication, thoracoscopic myotomy, pneumatic dilation, and botulinum toxin injection) were compared using a decision analysis (Markov) model. On the basis of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), only thoracoscopic myotomy was less effective than the other three strategies, but pneumatic dilation proved to be the most effective for patients with a life expectancy of more than seven years. However, based on these data, an individualized approach to patients with achalasia is recommended [1].

In a large series of 106 patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy, there was a failure rate of 10 in 106 (9.4 %), mainly due to uncut fibers at the gastric side of the lower esophageal sphincter (six of 10) or at the oral side (one of 10). The preoperative abdominal length of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was the main predictor of poor or good outcome [2]. Endoscopic treatment (dilation or botulinum toxin) or surgical treatment not only improved the symptoms (dysphagia, chest pain) but also led to an improvement in the quality of life and social functioning [3]. In a similar approach, three treatment methods were compared using a computer model. The model showed that initial laparoscopic myotomy achieved successful treatment with fewer procedures and fewer complications, but that pneumatic dilation was less costly [4].

The cost-effectiveness of different treatment methods (laparoscopic myotomy, pneumatic dilation, or botulinum toxin injection) in achalasia was analyzed over a five-year period using a computer model (Markov). Pneumatic dilation was the most cost-effective treatment per quality-adjusted life year, and botulinum toxin was preferable in the model under certain assumptions, but laparoscopic myotomy was not cost-effective [5].

Botulinum toxin treatment was associated with a higher cumulative rate of treatment failure when compared with pneumatic dilation in a prospective trial including 39 patients. The estimated Kaplan-Meier one-year retreatment rates were 85 % and 47 %, respectively. The treatment failure rates - unusually defined as relapse after two sessions - were 40 % and 0 %, and two botulinum toxin injections were found to be as effective as a single pneumatic dilation [6].

The experience and results with pneumatic dilation in 173 patients with a mean follow-up of 41.8 months showed good or fair treatment results in 76 % and 8.7 %, respectively, with low post-treatment LES pressure being the only predictor of a good treatment result. The overall complication rate was 5.1 %, with a perforation rate of 3.6 % [7].

The long-term follow-up of patients with achalasia was investigated using a questionnaire sent to 249 patients who had undergone pneumatic dilation. A total of 125 of the 249 responded (50 %), and reported results that were excellent (19 %), good (31 %), moderate (15 %), or poor (35 %). In a subgroup of patients with a mean follow-up of more than 20 years, the outcome was excellent (12 %), good (28 %), moderate (20 %), or poor (40 %), with a mean of four dilations. About 50 % of the patients required a second dilation after a mean of 6.4 years. Of the 32 patients who died during the follow-up, six (19 %) died of esophageal carcinoma, with an interval between first treatment and death of 9.9 years [8].

In four children under the age of two years and seven children older than two who had achalasia, forceful brief dilation with a Rigiflex balloon was found to be a safe technique. In children older than two years, the success rate was almost 100 %, but the results were different in those who were younger than two who underwent dilation using a 20-mm through-the-scope balloon; more dilations were needed, and the responses were poorer [9].

Gastroesophageal reflux is thought to be a rare symptom in patients with achalasia. In 19 of 35 patients with achalasia who underwent thoracoscopic myotomy, a 24-hour pH-metry study was performed. Pathological gastroesophageal reflux was found in six of the 19 (31 %), whereas eight (42 %) showed evidence of esophageal fermentation. Three of five patients who had postoperative reflux had also had preoperative reflux, indicating that patients with preoperative gastroesophageal reflux may have an increased risk for postoperative reflux problems. During a 40-month follow-up period, 83 % of the patients showed good or excellent results [10].

References

  • 1 Urbach D R, Hansen P D, Swanstrom L L. The optimal initial approach to achalasia: laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication, thoracoscopic Heller myotomy, pneumatic dilatation, or botulinum toxin injection?.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A1061
  • 2 Zaninotto G, Constantini M, Portale G, et al. Etiology, diagnosis and treatment of failures after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A1061
  • 3 Robson K, Zaman M S, Critchlow J, et al. Quality of life and symptomatic improvement in patients with achalasia: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB136
  • 4 Bosch A, Birgisson G, Park A E, Nickl J. Pneumatic dilation vs. laparoscopic management of achalasia: a decision analysis.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A1287
  • 5 O'Connor J B, Singer M E, Imperiale T F, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative treatment strategies for achalasia.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A215
  • 6 Malekzadeh R, Milkaeli J, Fazel A, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing botulinum toxin injection to pneumatic dilation for treatment of achalasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB143
  • 7 Salis G B, Mazzadi S A, Garcia A O, et al. Achalasia (A) and pneumatic dilatation (PD): a report from Argentina.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A465
  • 8 Boeckxstaens G E, Hirsch D P, West R L, et al. Long-term results of pneumatic dilation in achalasia.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A3206
  • 9 Leon K, Rondon L, Prestana E, et al. Achalasia in infancy: experience with forceful brief dilation.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A67
  • 10 Maher J W, Conklin J, Heitshusen D. Thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy (EM) for achalasia: preoperative patterns of acid reflux and long term follow-up.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A1033
  • 11 Mittal R K, Pehlivanov N, Liu J. Comparison of esophageal muscularis propria in patients with diffuse esophageal spasm and healthy subjects.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A1431
  • 12 Storr M, Allescher H D, Roesch T, et al. Treatment of symptomatic diffuse esophageal spasm by injection of botulinum toxin (BTX).  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A135
  • 13 Nanavati S A, Rengen M, Merchant N, Dutta M S. Critical evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of esophageal dilatation in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A629
  • 14 Scolapio J S, Gostout C J, Schroeder K W, et al. Dysphagia without endoscopically evident disease: to dilate or not?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB124
  • 15 Carvalho A M, Diniz G Jr, Oliveira R A, Borges V F. Endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB125
  • 16 Kochhar R, Makharia G, Singh A. Intralesional steroids augment the effects of endoscopic dilation in benign esophageal strictures.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A243
  • 17 Bueno R, Jaklitsch M T, Swanson S J, et al. A new technique for the dilation of completely obstructed esophageal strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB126
  • 18 Appleard M N, Mosse S, Mills T N, Swain P. Esophageal dilation: how hard do you push?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB108
  • 19 Ko B M, Ryu C B, Hong S J, et al. Effect of endoscopic microwave coagulation therapy in patients with benign structure of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB126
  • 20 Raju G S, Jones T F, Crawford G, et al. Endoscopic dilation of postcricoid esophageal strictures following head and neck cancer treatment: new techniques for safe access to PCES.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB108
  • 21 Dresner S M, Lamb P J, Wayman J, et al. Etiology and management of benign anastomotic stricture following transthoracic subtotal esophagectomy with stapled esophagogastrostomy.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A243
  • 22 Malhi-Chowla N, Gorecki P, Bammer T, et al. Dilation after fundoplication: timing, frequency, indication, and success.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB124
  • 23 Pekin M E, Cook I J. Schatzki ring: Reasons for delay in diagnosis and long-term response to dilatation.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 A244
  • 24 Lindor K D, Barkin J S, Amaro R, et al. Comparison of controlled radial expansion balloon dilators to conventional balloon dilators in patients with benign esophageal strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 AB111

H.-D. Allescher,M.D. 

Dept. of Internal Medicine II Technical University of Munich Klinikum rechts der Isar

Ismaninger Strasse 22 81676 Munich Germany

Fax: Fax:+ 49-89-4140-4932

Email: E-mail:hans.allescher@lrz.tu-muenchen.de

    >