Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in a Small Rural Community with a Solo Practice

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to review the safety and success of a trial of labor after cesarean in a group of patients managed by a solo practitioner in a rural community. This was a retrospective review of all deliveries performed over an 11-year period by a single practitioner in a rural community. Standard contraindications for attempt at vaginal birth after cesarean were observed. Between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1999, there were 5015 total deliveries. Women with at least one previous cesarean delivery accounted for 11.8% (593) of all patients. Trial of labor was attempted in 413 (74.5%) of these patients, and resulted in vaginal delivery in 308 (75%). Maternal complications were similar between the groups. There was no incidence of uterine rupture, maternal deaths, or neonatal deaths. Vaginal birth after cesarean can be performed safely in isolated rural hospitals with a high success rate.

Rural community - cesarean - VBAC

REFERENCES

• 1 Rosen M G, Dickinson J C, Westhoff C L. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality.  Obstet Gynecol . 1991;  77 465-470
• 2 Flamm B L, Goings J R, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multi-center study.  Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  83 927-932
• 3 Rosen M G, Dickinson J C. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of indicators for success.  Obstet Gynecol . 1990;  76 865-869
• 4 Duff P, Southmoyd K, Read J A. Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse cesarean section for dystocia.  Obstet Gynecol . 1988;  71 380-384
• 5 National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports, Births: Preliminary Data for 1999, Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2000
• 6 National Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Discharge Surveys: Annual Survey. 1997, Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics 1999
• 7 U.S Census Bureau 1995. 
• 8 Raynor B D. The experience with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a small community practice.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1993;  168 60-62
• 9 Walton D L, Ludlow D, Willis D C. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: acceptance and outcome at a rural hospital.  J Reprod Med . 1993;  38 716-718
• 10 Sieck C C. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a comparison of rural and metropolitan rates in Oklahoma.  J Okla Stat Med Assoc . 1997;  90 444-449
• 11 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Women's Health Care Washington, DC: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1996
• 12 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Optimal goals for anesthesia care in obstetrics Committee opinion no. 256. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2001
• 13 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of Labor. ACOG Technical Bulletin no 10. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1999
• 14 Gibbs R S, Blanco J D, St. Claire J P, Castaneda Y S. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from women with clinical intra-amniotic infection at term.  J Infect Dis . 1982;  145 1-8
• 15 Cunningham F G, MacDonald P C, Gant N F. et al .Infection and disorders of the puerperium. In: Williams Obstetrics 20th ed. Stanford, CT: Appleton & Lange 1997: 547-567
• 16 Vermillion S T, Lamoutte C, Soper D E, Verdeja A. Wound thickness after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness.  Obstet Gynecol . 2000;  95 923-926
• 17 Shiono P H, Felden J G, McNellis D. et al . Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States.  JAMA . 1987;  257 494