Endoscopy 2007; 39(6): 525-529
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966391
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in monitoring ethanol-induced pancreatic tissue ablation: a pilot study in a porcine model

S.  A.  Giday1 , P.  Magno1 , K.  L.  Gabrielson2 , J.  M.  Buscaglia1 , M.  I.  Canto1 , C.  W.  Ko3, 4 , J.  O.  Clarke1 , A.  N.  Kalloo1 , S.  B.  Jagannath1 , E.  J.  Shin1 , S.  V.  Kantsevoy1
  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 2Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 3Division of Gastroenterology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 4Division of Gastroenterology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 22 December 2006

accepted after revision 13 March 2007

Publication Date:
06 June 2007 (online)

Background and study aims: Pancreatic ablation is gaining popularity for the treatment of focal pancreatic lesions. The aim of our study was to evaluate local effects of intrapancreatic alcohol injection and the utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for its monitoring in a porcine model. Methods: We performed four survival experiments on 50-kg pigs. Under linear EUS guidance, 0.5mL of 50 % ethanol plus purified carbon particle solution (GI Spot®) was injected into the pancreatic body to create a focal area of pancreatic necrosis. The animals survived for 24 - 48 hours (pigs # 1, # 2, and # 3) and 7 days (pig # 4). EUS was then repeated with and without perflutren lipid microspheres (Definity®) administration through the peripheral vein. Standard and microsphere-enhanced images of the pancreas were compared. Afterwards the animals were euthanized for necropsy. Results: Alcohol injection caused focal pancreatic necrosis, which was barely seen by standard EUS as a subtle hypoechoic lesion 1 cm in diameter. Color and power Doppler EUS of this region did not reveal any blood flow. After intravenous injection of microspheres, color Doppler EUS revealed marked contrast enhancement of normal pancreatic parenchyma with a clearly delineated avascular alcohol-treated area, which on postmortem examination corresponded to the discrete necrotic area marked with carbon particles. Conclusions: EUS-guided alcohol injection consistently causes focal areas of pancreatic necrosis. Contrast-enhanced EUS with microspheres improves visualization of altered pancreatic vascular perfusion and can be used to facilitate detection of small pancreatic lesions and its follow-up post-ablation.

References

  • 1 American Cancer Society .Cancer facts and figures 2005. http://www.cancer.org
  • 2 Ferrucci J T, Wittenberg J, Margolies M N, Carey R W. Malignant seeding of the tract after thin-needle aspiration biopsy.  Radiology. 1979;  130 345-346
  • 3 Bret P M, Nicolet V, Labadie M. Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas.  Diagn Cytopathol. 1986;  2 221-227
  • 4 Ellsmere J, Mortele K, Sahani D. et al . Does multidetector-row CT eliminate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing the resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma?.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 369-373
  • 5 Takahashi K, Yamao K, Okubo K. et al . Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and focal pancreatitis by using EUS-guided FNA.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 76-79
  • 6 Brand B, Pfaff T, Binmoeller K F. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound for differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic lesions, confirmed by surgery.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 1221-1228
  • 7 Wiersema M J, Wiersema L M. Endosonography of the pancreas: normal variation versus changes of early chronic pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 1995;  5 487-496
  • 8 Rickes S, Mönkenmüller K, Malfertheiner P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors.  JOP (Online). 2006;  7 584-592
  • 9 Bryant T H, Blomley M J, Albrecht T. et al . Improved characterization of liver lesions with liver-phase uptake of liver-specific microbubbles: prospective multicenter study.  Radiology. 2004;  232 799-809
  • 10 Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S. et al . Contrast enhanced power Doppler US in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  26 2496-2499
  • 11 Chang K J. EUS-guided fine needle injection (FNI) and anti-tumor therapy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 Suppl 1 S88-S93
  • 12 Klapman J B, Chang K J. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle injection.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;  15 169-177, x
  • 13 Jurgensen C, Schuppan D, Neser F. et al . EUS-guided alcohol ablation of an insulinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 1059-1062
  • 14 Matthes K, Mino-Kenudson M, Sahani D V. et al . Concentration-dependent ablation of pancreatic tissue by EUS-guided ethanol injection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 272-277
  • 15 Aslanian H, Salem R R, Marginean C. et al . EUS-guided ethanol injection of normal porcine pancreas: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 723-727
  • 16 Gan S I, Thompson C C, Lauwers G Y. et al . Ethanol lavage of pancreatic cystic lesions: initial pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 746-752
  • 17 Burns P N, Wilson S R. Microbubble contrast for radiological imaging: 1. Principles.  Ultrasound Q. 2006;  22 5-13
  • 18 Bristol-Myers S. Definity® (package insert). N. Billerica, Massachusetts, USA; Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Imaging corp 2006

S. V. Kantsevoy, MD 

Johns Hopkins Hospital
Division of Gastroenterology

1830 East Monument Street Room 423
Baltimore, MD 21205
USA

Fax: +1-410-614-2490

Email: svkan@jhmi.edu

    >