Capsule endoscopy with retention of the capsule in a duodenal diverticulum

Table of Contents

The most important complication of capsule endoscopy is retention of the capsule. Among patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, capsule retention was reported in 1.5 %; in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease or suspected stenosis of the small bowel the risk of capsule retention seems to be considerably higher (5 % and 21 % respectively) [1] [2]. To our best knowledge this is the first case of capsule retention in a duodenal diverticulum.

A 74-year-old woman was admitted to hospital for evaluation of microcytic anemia. Gastroscopy and colonoscopy were normal. Capsule endoscopy, using the M2A capsule (Given Imaging Ltd., Yoqneam, Israel [3]), demonstrated some diverticula shortly after passage of the pylorus. Further images were not evaluable.

Three weeks afterwards the patient was asymptomatic but had still not excreted the capsule. A plain film of the abdomen demonstrated the capsule superimposed on the epigastrium and was otherwise normal ([Fig. 1]). A small-bowel radiograph with water-soluble contrast medium showed the capsule in a duodenal diverticulum and ruled out obstruction of the small bowel ([Fig. 2]). Gastroscopy was performed and the capsule successfully extracted from a large juxtapapillary diverticulum using the Roth retrieval net ([Fig. 3]).

Fig. 1 Plain film anteroposterior abdominal radiograph: the capsule is superimposed on the epigastrium.

Fig. 2 Small-bowel radiograph with water-soluble contrast medium: the capsule is retained in a large duodenal diverticulum.

Fig. 3 The capsule was captured in a Roth retrieval net (white arrow). The yellow arrow marks the Teflon-coated tube of the net.

Most patients with capsule retention are asymptomatic. However, a very few cases of symptomatic bowel obstruction requiring surgical or endoscopic removal of the impacted capsule have been reported [4] [5]. This is the first case of capsule retention in a duodenal diverticulum and successful endoscopic removal of the impacted capsule. We suggest that, even in asymptomatic patients, capsules that are retained in intestinal diverticula and are not excreted within a period of about 3 weeks should be removed by gastroscopy or enteroscopy in order to prevent complications such as diverticulitis, perforation, or pancreatitis.

We conclude that capsule retention in a duodenal diverticulum is a rare complication of capsule endoscopy. In our patient endoscopic removal of the impacted capsule using a retrieval net was successful.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AI_2AB

References

• 1 Lewis B. How to prevent endoscopic capsule retention.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 852-856
• 2 Lewis B. Capsule endoscopy – transit abnormalities.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006;  16 221-228
• 3 Mata A, Llach J, Bordas J M. Wireless capsule endoscopy.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  13 1969-1971
• 4 Sears D M, Avots-Avotins A, Culp K, Gavin M W. Frequency and clinical outcome of capsule retention during capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 822-827
• 5 Hara A K, Leighton J A, Sharma V K, Fleischer D E. Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT.  Radiology. 2004;  230 260-265