DOI: 10.1055/s-00000165

Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal

Issue S 01 · Volume 03 · February 2012 DOI: 10.1055/s-002-23281

Introduction

  • 5
    Chapman, Jens R; Riew, Daniel:

    Cervical artificial disc replacement: still experimental? Introduction and perspectives on cervical artificial disc replacement

    • Systematic review

  • 9
    Anderson, Paul A; Hashimoto, Robin:

    Total disc replacement in the cervical spine: a systematic review evaluating long-term safety

  • 019
    Kepler, Christopher K.; Brodt, Erika D.; Dettori, Joseph R.; Albert, Todd J.:

    Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgery

  • 31
    Lehman, Ronald; Bevevino, Adam J; Brewer, Devon D; Skelly, Andrea C; Anderson, Paul A:

    A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability

  • 39
    Riew, K Daniel; Schenk-Kisser, Jeannette M; Skelly, Andrea C:

    Adjacent segment disease and C-ADR: promises fulfilled?

  • 47
    Traynelis, Vincent C; Leigh, Barbara C; Skelly, Andrea C:

    Return to work rates and activity profiles: are there differences between those receiving C-ADR and ACDF?

  • 53
    Rhee, John; VanAlstyne, Ellen M; Skelly, Andrea C:

    Cervical artificial disc replacement (C-ADR): global perspectives on use and trends

  • 59
    Mummaneni, Praveen V; Amin, Beejal Y; Wu, Jau-Ching; Brodt, Erika D; Dettori, Joseph R; Sasso, Rick C:

    Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing long-term follow-up results from two FDA trials