Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2307-6949
Original article

Safety and efficacy of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett’s neoplasia recurrence after radiofrequency ablation

Lauriane Mesureur
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepato-pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Universitair Bruxelles Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN70496)
,
Pierre H. Deprez
2   Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN70492)
,
3   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Roos E. Pouw
4   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN26066)
,
Bas L.A.M. Weusten
5   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
6   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN8125)
,
Maximilien Barret
7   Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hopital Cochin, Paris, France (Ringgold ID: RIN26935)
,
Pieter Dewint
8   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepato-pancreatology and Digestive Oncology,, AZ Maria Middelares - Campus Sint-Jozef, Gentbrugge, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN192825)
,
David Tate
9   Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN60200)
,
Philippe Leclercq
10   Department of Gastroenterology, Clinique CHC MontLégia, Liège, Belgium
,
Stefan Seewald
11   Center for Gastroenterology, Hirlanden Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Federico Barbaro
12   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
,
13   Endoscopy, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden (Ringgold ID: RIN59562)
,
Masami Omae
13   Endoscopy, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden (Ringgold ID: RIN59562)
,
Mathieu Pioche
14   Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Disease Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36609)
,
Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
15   Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium
,
Michael J. Bourke
16   Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
,
Rehan Haidry
17   Department of Gastroenterology, University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN4919)
,
Christophe Snauwaert
18   Gastro-enterology, AZ Sint-Jan AV, BRUGGE, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN60208)
,
Pierre Eisendrath
19   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepato-pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Universitair Bruxelles Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN70496)
,
Viviane DE MAERTELAER
20   Institute of Interdisciplinary Research (IRIBHM), Statistical unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN26659)
,
Nicolas Rosewick
21   Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium
,
Jacques Devière
22   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepato-pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Universitair Bruxelles Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN70496)
,
23   Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium
› Author Affiliations

Background and study aims: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett’s neoplasia recurrence after radiofrequency ablation. Patients and methods: Data from patients at sixteen centers were collected for a multicentric retrospective study. Patients who underwent at least one RFA treatment for Barrett’s esophagus and thereafter underwent further esophageal ESD for neoplasia recurrence were included. Results: Data from 56 patients treated by salvage ESD performed between April 2014 and November 2022 were collected. Immediate complications included one muscular tear (1.8%) treated with stent (Agree classification: grade IIIa), two patients had transmural perforations (4%) and five patients had muscular tears (9%) treated with clips and without clinical impact and not considered as adverse event. Seven patients (12.5%) developed strictures, treated by balloon dilation (grade IIIa). Histological analysis showed 36 adenocarcinomas, 17 high-grade dysplasia, and 3 low-grade dysplasia. En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 89% and 66%, respectively. Resections were curative in thirty-three patients (59%), non-curative in 22 patients (39%), including 11 “local risk” (19.5%) and 11 “high risk” resections (19.5%). At the end of follow-up with a median time of 14 [0-75] months after salvage ESD eventually associated with further endoscopic treatment (RFA, argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, ESD), neoplasia remission ratio was 37/53 (70%) and the median remission time was 13 [1-75] months. Conclusion: In expert hands, salvage ESD is a safe and effective treatment for recurrence of Barrett’s neoplasia after RFA treatment.



Publication History

Received: 26 June 2023

Accepted after revision: 16 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 April 2024

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany