Download PDF
Semin Hear 2010; 31(4): 350-365
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268034
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Verification of Baha Fitting for Single-Sided Deafness: How, What, Where and Why Do We Measure?

William W. Dickinson1
  • 1Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Nashville, Tennessee
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 December 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Verification is one of the most significant responsibilities for a rehabilitative audiologist. Historically, the definition and procedures used to determine proper device function and aided benefit has varied for audiology. Verification is an essential component in the process of fitting a bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha) for unilateral hearing loss (UHL). UHL will be preferred to the more contemporary term of single-sided deafness and defined as one ear that is unaidable and the other ear having normal hearing sensitivity (i.e., 20 dB hearing level or better from 500 to 3000 Hz). This article will investigate contemporary objective Baha verification measures available to the rehabilitative audiologist, specifically evaluating the following: How can audiologists verify the performance of the Baha? What should be verified? Where should the measurement take place? Why is it necessary to verify?

KEYWORDS

Baha - verification - bone conduction - real-ear measurement - electroacoustic analysis

REFERENCES

  • 1 von Békésy G. Experiments in Hearing. New York, NY; McGraw-Hill 1960
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Freeman S, Sichel J Y, Sohmer H. Bone conduction experiments in animals—evidence for a non-osseous mechanism.  Hear Res. 2000;  146(1–2) 72-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Publication Hub Gateway to UK National Statistics. Office for National Statistics. National statistics releases for 13 January 2010. http://Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/index.html Accessed January 13, 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Valente M, Abrams H, Benson D et al. Guidelines for the audiological management of adult hearing impairment.  Audiol Today. 2006;  18(5) 1-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wazen J J, Spitzer J B, Ghossaini S N et al. Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  129(3) 248-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stenfelt S, Wild T, Hato N, Goode R L. Factors contributing to bone conduction: the outer ear.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;  113(2) 902-913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tonndorf J. Bone conduction: studies in experimental animals.  Acta Otolaryngol. 1966;  61(213) 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Franke E. Response of the human skull to mechanical vibrations.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1956;  28 1277-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kirikae I. An experimental study on the fundamental mechanism of bone conduction.  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1959;  145(145) 1-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yoshida M, Uemura T. Transmission of cerebrospinal fluid pressure changes to the inner ear and its effect on cochlear microphonics.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1991;  248(3) 139-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stenfelt S, Goode R L. Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects.  Otol Neurotol. 2005;  26(6) 1245-1261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tonndorf J, Jahn A F. Velocity of propagation of bone-conducted sound in a human head.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1981;  70(5) 1294-1297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Huizing E H. Bone conduction—the influence of the middle ear.  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1960;  155(155) 1-99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Franke E, von Gierke H, Grossman F, von Wittern W. The jaw motions relative to the skull and their influence on hearing by bone conduction.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1952;  24 142-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Howell P, Williams M, Dix H. Assessment of sound in the ear canal caused by movement of the jaw relative to the skull.  Scand Audiol. 1988;  17(2) 93-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Khanna S M, Tonndorf J, Queller J E. Mechanical parameters of hearing by bone conduction.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1976;  60(1) 139-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fagelson M, Martin F N. Sound pressure in the external auditory canal during bone-conduction testing.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1994;  5(6) 379-383
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Møller A R. Hearing. Its Physiology and Pathophysiology. San Diego, CA; Academic Press 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Queller J E, Khanna S M. Changes in bone conduction thresholds with vibrator contact area.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1982;  71(6) 1519-1526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bárány E. A contribution to the physiology of bone conduction.  Acta Otolaryngol. 1938;  26(Suppl) 1-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Carhart R. Effect of stapes fixation on bone conduction response. In: Schuknecht H Otosclerosis. Boston, MA; Little, Brown and Company 1962: 175-197
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Walsh T. Fenestration: results, indications, limitations. In: Schuknecht H Otosclerosis. Boston, MA; Little, Brown and Company 1962: 245-250
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Giolas T. Aural rehabilitation of adults with hearing impairment. In: Katz J Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD; Williams and Wilkins 1994: 776-792
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Chiossoine-Kerdel J A, Baguley D M, Stoddart R L, Moffat D A. An investigation of the audiologic handicap associated with unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss.  Am J Otol. 2000;  21(5) 645-651
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Newman C W, Weinstein B E, Jacobson G P, Hug G A. Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults.  Ear Hear. 1991;  12(5) 355-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Newman C W, Jacobson G P, Hug G A, Sandridge S A. Perceived hearing handicap of patients with unilateral or mild hearing loss.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;  106(3) 210-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Niparko J K, Cox K M, Lustig L R. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.  Otol Neurotol. 2003;  24(1) 73-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mylanus E A, van der Pouw K C, Snik A F, Cremers C W. Intraindividual comparison of the bone-anchored hearing aid and air-conduction hearing aids.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;  124(3) 271-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Baguley D M, Bird J, Humphriss R L, Prevost A T. The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;  31(1) 6-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sargent E W, Herrmann B, Hollenbeak C S, Bankaitis A E. The minimum speech test battery in profound unilateral hearing loss.  Otol Neurotol. 2001;  22(4) 480-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Welsh L W, Welsh J J, Rosen L F, Dragonette J E. Functional impairments due to unilateral deafness.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;  113(12) 987-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Linstrom C J, Silverman C A, Yu G P. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.  Laryngoscope. 2009;  119(4) 713-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dillion H. Prescribing hearing aid performance. In: Dillion H Hearing Aids, 1st ed. New York, NY; Thieme 2000: 234-280
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Carhart R. Selection of hearing aids.  Arch Otolaryngol. 1965;  44 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Dirks D D, Kincaid G E. Basic acoustic considerations of ear canal probe measurements.  Ear Hear. 1987;  8(5, Suppl) 60S-67S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hawkins D B. Clinical ear canal probe tube measurements.  Ear Hear. 1987;  8 (Suppl) 74-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hawkins D B, Mueller H G. Some variables affecting the accuracy of probe tube microphone measurements.  Hear Instrum. 1986;  37 8-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

William W DickinsonAu.D. 

Assistant Professor, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical School

Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Suite 9302, Nashville, TN 37232

Email: william.w.dickinson@vanderbilt.edu

      >