Zentralbl Chir 2013; 138(3): 301-306
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271387
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ˙ New York

Inzidenz, Risikofaktoren und Prävention der intestinalen Nahtinsuffizienz

Incidence of, Risk Factors for, and Prevention of Intestinal LeakageD. Henne-Bruns1 , K. Kramer1
  • 1Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum, Ulm, Deutschland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 May 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die intestinale Anastomoseninsuffizienz stellt eine schwerwiegende Komplikation mit relevanter Morbidität und Mortalität dar. Material und Methoden: Auf Grundlage einer Literaturrecherche in Medline / PubMed werden die Daten zum Thema im Überblick dargestellt, kritisch bewertet und zusammengefasst. Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerung: Neben der ­Optimierung der chirurgischen Technik spielen patientenabhängige Risikofaktoren eine wesentliche Rolle für die Entwicklung einer Anasto­mosen­insuffizienz. Dazu gehören Begleiterkran­kungen, der Ernährungsstatus und die Einnahme bestimmter Medikamente oder eine vorangegangene Radio-Chemotherapie. Der Aufwand zur Optimierung dieser patientenbedingten Risikofaktoren findet im heutigen stationären Vergütungssystem keine Abbildung. 

Abstract

Background: Intestinal anastomotic leakage represents a major complication in visceral surgery with relevant morbidity and mortality. Material and Methods: Based on a literature ­search in Medline / PubMed the available data are presented, critically reviewed and summarised. Results and Conclusion: Beside optimisation of surgical technique, patient-dependent risk factors – such as relevant comorbidity, certain medica­tions or previous radiochemotherapy – play a major role in the development of anastomotic leak­age. The effort for optimisation of these patient-dependent risk factors is not incorporated within the compensation scheme in German hospitals. 

Literatur

  • 1 Wolf A M, Henne-Bruns D. [Anastomosis dehiscence in the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnosis and therapy].  Chirurg. 2002;  73 394-405 quiz 406-407
  • 2 Khan A A, Wheeler J M, Cunningham C et al. The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery.  Colorectal Dis. 2008;  10 587-592
  • 3 Bruce J, Krukowski Z H, Al-Khairy G et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 1157-1168
  • 4 Hyman N, Manchester T L, Osler T et al. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it‘s later than you think.  Ann Surg. 2007;  245 254-258
  • 5 Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1164-1171
  • 6 Golub R, Golub R W, Cantu Jr R et al. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses.  J Am Coll Surg. 1997;  184 364-372
  • 7 Polat A, Nayci A, Polat G et al. Dexamethasone down-regulates endothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule and impairs the healing of bowel anastomoses.  Eur J Surg. 2002;  168 500-506
  • 8 Valente J F, Hricik D, Weigel K et al. Comparison of sirolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil on surgical complications and wound healing in adult kidney transplantation.  Am J Transplant. 2003;  3 1128-1134
  • 9 Siewert J R, Stein H J, Bartels H. [Anastomotic leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract].  Chirurg. 2004;  75 1063-1070
  • 10 Welsch T, von Frankenberg M, Schmidt J et al. [Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the surgeon‘s perspective.].  Chirurg. 2011;  82 48-55
  • 11 Ng T, Vezeridis M P. Advances in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.  J Surg Oncol. 2010;  101 725-729
  • 12 Alanezi K, Urschel J D. Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak.  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  10 71-75
  • 13 Holscher A H, Schroder W, Bollschweiler E et al. [How safe is high intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy?].  Chirurg. 2003;  74 726-733
  • 14 Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C et al. Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1 114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;  26 168-171
  • 15 Meyer L, Meyer F, Dralle H et al. Insufficiency risk of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total abdominal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;  390 510-516
  • 16 Holscher A H, Vallbohmer D, Brabender J. The prevention and management of perioperative complications.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  20 907-923
  • 17 Ercan S, Rice T W, Murthy S C et al. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  129 623-631
  • 18 Orringer M B, Marshall B, Chang A C et al. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned.  Ann Surg. 2007;  246 363-372 discussion 372–374
  • 19 Escofet X, Manjunath A, Twine C et al. Prevalence and outcome of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in a UK regional cancer network.  Dis Esophagus. 2010;  23 112-116
  • 20 Tabatabai A, Hashemi M, Mohajeri G et al. Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy.  Ann Thorac Med. 2009;  4 197-200
  • 21 Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H et al. [Pancreatic leakage after pancreas resection. An analysis of 345 operated patients].  Chirurg. 2002;  73 466-473
  • 22 Mann C D, Palser T, Briggs C D et al. A review of factors predicting peri­operative death and early outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer surgery.  HPB (Oxford). 2010;  12 380-388
  • 23 Schafer M, Mullhaupt B, Clavien P A. Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.  Ann Surg. 2002;  236 137-148
  • 24 Sulberg D, Chromik A M, Koster O et al. [Prevention and management of postoperative complications in pancreatic surgery].  Zentralbl Chir. 2010;  135 129-138
  • 25 Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.  Surgery. 2005;  138 8-13
  • 26 Goh B K, Tan Y M, Cheow P C et al. Outcome of distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.  Dig Surg. 2008;  25 32-38
  • 27 Pratt W B, Maithel S K, Vanounou T et al. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme.  Ann Surg. 2007;  245 443-451
  • 28 Adams D B. The pancreatic anastomosis: the danger of a leak, which anastomotic technique is better?.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;  13 1182-1183
  • 29 Hopt U T, Makowiec F, Adam U. [Leakage after biliary and pancreatic surgery].  Chirurg. 2004;  75 1079-1087
  • 30 Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.  Surgery. 2003;  134 766-771
  • 31 Hosotani R, Doi R, Imamura M. Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy reduces the risk of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy.  World J Surg. 2002;  26 99-104
  • 32 Imaizumi T, Harada N, Hatori T et al. Stenting is unnecessary in duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy even in the normal pancreas.  Pancreatology. 2002;  2 116-121
  • 33 Okamoto A, Tsuruta K. Fistulation method: simple and safe pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.  Surgery. 2000;  127 433-438
  • 34 Peng S, Mou Y, Cai X et al. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage.  Am J Surg. 2002;  183 283-285
  • 35 Chromik A M, Sulberg D, Belyaev O et al. [Technical aspects of pancreatoenteric anastomosis.].  Chirurg. 2011;  82 14-25
  • 36 Li-Ling J, Irving M. Somatostatin and octreotide in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic complications and the treatment of enterocutaneous pancreatic fistulas: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 190-199
  • 37 Buchler M, Friess H, Klempa I et al. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection.  Am J Surg. 1992;  163 125-130 discussion 130–131
  • 38 Friess H, Beger H G, Sulkowski U et al. Randomized controlled multicentre study of the prevention of complications by octreotide in patients undergoing surgery for chronic pancreatitis.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1270-1273
  • 39 Montorsi M, Zago M, Mosca F et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.  Surgery. 1995;  117 26-31
  • 40 Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Falconi M et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Italian Study Group.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 265-269
  • 41 Lowy A M, Lee J E, Pisters P W et al. Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease.  Ann Surg. 1997;  226 632-641
  • 42 Yeo C J, Cameron J L, Lillemoe K D et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial.  Ann Surg. 2000;  232 419-429
  • 43 Zeng Q, Zhang Q, Han S et al. Efficacy of somatostatin and its analogues in prevention of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.  Pancreas. 2008;  36 18-25
  • 44 Alghamdi A A, Jawas A M, Hart R S. Use of octreotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Can J Surg. 2007;  50 459-466
  • 45 Poon R T, Fan S T. Decreasing the pancreatic leak rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy.  Adv Surg. 2008;  42 33-48
  • 46 Heidenhain C, Rosch R, Neumann U P. [Hepatobiliary anastomosis techniques.].  Chirurg. 2011;  82 7-13
  • 47 Fujino Y, Suzuki Y, Ajiki T et al. Risk factors influencing pancreatic leakage and the mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a medium-volume hospital.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;  49 1124-1129
  • 48 Srivastava S, Sikora S S, Pandey C M et al. Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy.  ANZ J Surg. 2001;  71 511-515
  • 49 Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y et al. Factors influencing hepaticojejunostomy leak following pancreaticoduodenal resection; importance of anastomotic leak test.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;  50 254-257
  • 50 Mathur A, Pitt H A, Marine M et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula.  Ann Surg. 2007;  246 1058-1064
  • 51 Rosso E, Casnedi S, Pessaux P et al. The role of “fatty pancreas” and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;  13 1845-1851
  • 52 de Castro S M, Kuhlmann K F, Busch O R et al. Incidence and management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;  9 1163-1171 discussion 1171-1173
  • 53 Ozturk E, Can M F, Yagci G et al. Management and mid- to long-term results of early referred bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;  56 17-25
  • 54 Sotiropoulos G C, Sgourakis G, Radtke A et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation: T-tube or not T-tube? Systematic review and meta-analysis of results.  Transplantation. 2009;  87 1672-1680
  • 55 Scatton O, Meunier B, Cherqui D et al. Randomized trial of choledochocholedochostomy with or without a T tube in orthotopic liver transplantation.  Ann Surg. 2001;  233 432-437
  • 56 Weiss S, Schmidt S C, Ulrich F et al. Biliary reconstruction using a side-to-side choledochocholedochostomy with or without T-tube in deceased donor liver transplantation: a prospective randomized trial.  Ann Surg. 2009;  250 766-771
  • 57 Egawa H, Inomata Y, Uemoto S et al. Biliary anastomotic complications in 400 living related liver transplantations.  World J Surg. 2001;  25 1300-1307
  • 58 Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck T H et al. Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;  19 128-133
  • 59 Read T E, Mutch M G, Chang B W et al. Locoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon.  J Am Coll Surg. 2002;  195 33-40
  • 60 Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W. Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;  29 239-243
  • 61 Willis S, Kasperk R, Braun J et al. Comparison of colonic J-pouch reconstruction and straight coloanal anastomosis after intersphincteric rectal resection.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;  386 193-199
  • 62 Kube R, Mroczkowski P, Steinert R et al. [Anastomotic leakage following bowel resections for colon cancer: multivariate analysis of risk factors].  Chirurg. 2009;  80 1153-1159
  • 63 Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al. Wert des Protektiven Enterostoma bei tiefen anterioren Rektumresektionen.. In: Köckerling F, Lippert H, Gastinger I, Hrsg Fortschritte in der koloretalen Chirurgie.. Hannover: Sciene Med Dr. Sperber; 2002: 63-69
  • 64 Willis S, Stumpf M. [Leakages after surgery of the lower gastrointestinal tract].  Chirurg. 2004;  75 1071-1078
  • 65 Harris L J, Moudgill N, Hager E et al. Incidence of anastomotic leak in patients undergoing elective colon resection without mechanical bowel preparation: our updated experience and two-year review.  Am Surg. 2009;  75 828-833
  • 66 Huser N, Michalski C W, Erkan M et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.  Ann Surg. 2008;  248 52-60
  • 67 Tsunoda A, Tsunoda Y, Narita K et al. Quality of life after low anterior resection and temporary loop ileostomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;  51 218-222
  • 68 Utech M, Senninger N, Anthoni C. [Ostomy for stool deviation: indications and operative techniques].  Chirurg. 2009;  80 1171-1178 quiz 1179-1180
  • 69 Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A et al. Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;  395 1025-1030
  • 70 Soeters P B, de Zoete J P, Dejong C H et al. Colorectal surgery and anastomotic leakage.  Dig Surg. 2002;  19 150-155
  • 71 Stumpf M, Cao W, Klinge U et al. Collagen distribution and expression of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 13 in patients with anastomotic leakage after large-bowel surgery.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;  386 502-506
  • 72 Iancu C, Mocan L C, Todea-Iancu D et al. Host-related predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer.  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008;  17 299-303

Prof. Dr. D. Henne-Bruns

Universitätsklinikum Ulm · Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie

Steinhoevelstr. 9

89075 Ulm

Deutschland

Phone: +49 / (0)7 31 / 50 00

Fax: +49 / (0)7 31 / 50 05 35 03

Email: sekretariat.chirurgie@uniklinik-ulm.de

    >