Download PDF
neuroreha 2011; 3(2): 58-65
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277113
Schwerpunkt Neglekt und Pusher-Symptomatik
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neglekt: Eine Einführung – Übersicht über Neglektarten und Erklärungsmodelle

Daniela Glocker, Günter Neumann
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 June 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Skalen zur Erfassung von Neglekt- und Pusher-Symptomatikneuroreha 2011; 3(02): 66-73
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277114

Zusammenfassung

Nach einer Gewebsschädigung des Gehirns beobachtet man bei manchen Patienten, dass sie sich verhalten, als existiere eine Seite des Raumes oder des eigenen Körpers nicht mehr. Dieses Phänomen wird als Neglekt bezeichnet. Etwa ein Drittel der rechtshemisphärisch und ein Achtel der linkshemisphärisch geschädigten Patienten weist in der chronischen Phase einen Neglekt auf. Früher verstand man unter der Bezeichnung Neglekt synonym den visuellen Neglekt, die gegenwärtige Betrachtung ist differenzierter und schließt verschiedene Sinnesmodalitäten, aber auch Raumsektoren ein. Daniela Glocker und Günter Neumann beschreiben die aktuellen theoretischen Hintergründe zu diesem Störungsbild sowie momentane Behandlungsansätze für Patienten mit Neglekt, die sich an den Top-down- und Bottom-up-Therapieansätzen orientieren.

Literatur

  • 01 Ackroyd K, Riddoch M J, Humphrey G W et al.. Widening the sphere of influence: Using a tool to extent extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect.  Neurocase. 2002;  8 1-12
    Google Scholar
  • 02 Bartolomeo P, De Schotten M T, Doricchi F. Left Unilateral Neglect as a Disconnection Syndrome.  Cerebral Cortex. 2007;  17 2479-2490
    Google Scholar
  • 03 Bellmann A, Meuli R, Clarke S. Two types of auditory neglect.  Brain. 2001;  124 676-687
    Google Scholar
  • 04 Berti A, Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use.  Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2000;  12 415-420
    Google Scholar
  • 05 Bisiach E, Capitani E, Porta E. Two basic properties of space representation in the brain: Evidence from unilateral neglect.  Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 1985;  48 141-144
    Google Scholar
  • 06 Bisiach E, Capitani E, Luzzatti C et al.. Brain and conscious representation of outside reality.  Neuropsychologia. 1981;  19 543-551
    Google Scholar
  • 07 Bourlon C, Pradat-Diehl P, Duret C et al.. Seeing and imaging the same object in unilateral neglect.  Neuropsychologia. 2008;  46 2602-2606
    Google Scholar
  • 08 Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis R C. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke.  Stroke. 1999;  30 1196-1202
    Google Scholar
  • 09 Buxbaum L J, Ferraro M K, Veramonti T et al.. Hemispatial neglect. Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability.  Neurology. 2004;  62 749-756
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Cocchini G, Beschin N, Jehkonen M. The Fluff test: a simple task to assess body representation neglect.  Neuropsychological Rehabil. 2001;  11 1731
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Colby C L, Duhamel J R, Goldberg; M E. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: Anatomic location and visual response properties.  Journal of Neurophysiology. 1993;  69 902-914
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Colby C L, Duhamel J R. Heterogenity of extrastriate visual areas and multiple parietal areas in the macaque monkey cortex.  Neuropsychologia. 1991;  29 517-537
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Committeri G, Pitzalis S, Galat G et al.. Neural bases of personal and extrapersonal neglect in human.  Brain. 2007;  130 431-441
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Coslett H B. Evidence for a disturbance of the body schema in neglect.  Brain and Cognition. 1998;  37 527-544
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 De Renzi E, Gentilini M, Pattacini F. Auditory extinction following hemisphere damage.  Neuropsychologia. 1984;  22 733-744
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Denny-Brown D, Meyer J S, Horenstein G. The significance of perceptual rivality resulting from parietal lesions.  Brain. 1952;  75 433-471
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Fels M, Geissner E. Neglect-Test (NET). 2. Aufl. Hogrefe; Göttingen; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Gaffan D, Hornak J. Amnesia and Neglect: Beyond the Delay-Brion system and the Hepp synapse. In: Burgess N, Jeffery Jo, O’Keefe Jo The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition. Oxford University Press; Oxford; 1999: 345-358
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gilad R, Sadeh M, Boaz M et al.. Visual spatial neglect in multiple sclerosis.  Cortex. 2006;  42 1138-1142
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Glocker D, Bittl P, Kerkhoff G. The Vest test: construction and psychometric validation of a novel test for the measurement of body representational neglect.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;  24 303-317
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Golay L, Schnider A, Ptak R. Cortical and subcortical anatomy of chronic spatial neglect following vascular damage.  Behavioral and Brain Functions. 2008;  4 43
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gottesmann R F, Kleinman J T, Davis C et al.. Unilateral neglect is more severe and common in older patients with right hemispheric stroke.  Neurology. 2008;  71 1439-1444
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Groh-Bordin C, Glocker D, Bittl P et al.. Scanning your body is different from performing body movements: A double dissociation from body representational neglect and apraxia.  Neuropsychologia. 2009;  47 1187-1192
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Halligan P W, Cockburn J, Wilson B. The behavioural assessment of visual neglect.  Neuropsychological Rehabil. 1991;  1 5-32
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Hamilton R H, Coslett H B, Buxbaum L J. Inconsistency of performance of neglect subtype tests following acute right hemisphere stroke.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;  14 23-32
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Heilman K M, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect).  Neurology. 1980;  30 327-330
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Husain M, Rorden C. Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect.  Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2003;  26-36
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones.  Neuroreport. 1996;  7 2325-2330
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jeannerod M, Biguer B. The directional coding of reaching movements. A visuomotor conception of spatial neglect. In: Jeannerod M  Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. North-Holland; Amsterdam; 1987: 87-113
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jehkonen M. The role of visual neglect and anosognosia in functional recovery after right hemisphere stroke.  Acta Universitatis Tamperensis. 2002;  126
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Kalra L, Perez I, Gupta S et al.. The influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation.  Stroke. 1997;  28 1386-1391
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Karnath H O. Neglect. In: Hartje W, Poeck K Klinische Neuropsychologie. Thieme; Stuttgart; 2002: 334-360
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Karnath H O. Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 1997;  352 1411-1419
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kerkhoff G, Neumann G, Neu J. Ratgeber Neglect Leben in einer halbierten Welt. Hogrefe; Göttingen; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Kerkhoff G. Neglect und assoziierte Störungen. Hogrefe; Göttingen; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Kerkhoff G. Modulation and rehabilitation of spatial neglect by sensory stimulation.  Progress in Brain Research. 2003;  142 257-271
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Kerkhoff G. Spatial neglect in humans.  Progress in Neurobiology. 2001;  63 1-27
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kinsbourne M. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In: Robertson I H, Marshall J  Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. LEA publishers; Hove; 1993: 63-86
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kleinman J T, Newhart M, Davis C et al.. Right hemispatial neglect: Frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke.  Brain. 2007;  64 50-59
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Lawson I R. Visual-spatial neglect in lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere: A study in recovery.  Neurology. 1962;  12 23-33
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mesulam M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect.  Annals of Neurology. 1981;  10 309-325
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ota H, Fujii T, Suzuki K. Dissociation of body-centered and stimulus-centered representations in unilateral neglect.  Neurology. 2001;  57 2064-2069
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Payne B R, Lombe S G, Geeraerts S et al.. Reversible visual hemineglect.  Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;  93 290-294
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Posner M I, Walker J A, Friedrich F A et al.. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting in attention.  Journal of Neuroscience. 1984;  4 1863-1874
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Rode G, Luauté J, Klos T et al.. Bottom-up visuo-manual adaptation: consequences for spatial cognition. In: Haggard P, Rossetti Y, Kawato M Sensorimotor Foundation of Higher Cognition. Attention and Performance XXII. Oxford University Press; New York; 2007: 207-229
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Sparing R, Thimm M, Hesse M D et al.. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation.  Brain. 2009;  132 3011-3020
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Vallar G. Spatial frames of reference and somatosensory processing: A neuropsychological perspective.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 1997;  1401-1409
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Verdon V, Schwartz S, Lovblad et al.. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.  Brain. 2010;  133 880-894
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Vossel S, Kukolja J, Fink G R. Neurobiologische Grundlagen des Neglects: Implikationen für neue Therapieansätze.  Fortschr Neurol Psychiat. 2010;  78 733-745
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar

Günter Neumann

Abteilung Neuropsychologie

Neurochirurgische und Neurologische Fachklinik, Klinik Kipfenberg GmbH

Kindinger Str. 13

85110 Kipfenberg

Phone: 08465/175-215

Email: g.neumann@neurologie-kipfenberg.de

      >