Arzneimittelforschung 2011; 61(6): 353-357
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296210
Anticoagulants · Antithrombotics · Anti-varicosis Drugs · Blood Flow Stimulants
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Study on bioavailability difference between clopidogrel bisulfate form I and form II using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

Qiao-Gen Zou
1   Biology and Pharmacy Engineer Department, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing, (P. R. China)
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, (P. R. China)
,
Xiao-Heng Tan
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, (P. R. China)
,
Wen-Jun Che
3   Administration for Products Quality Supervision and Inspection of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, (P. R. China)
,
Zun-Jian Zhang
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, (P. R. China)
,
Ping Wei
1   Biology and Pharmacy Engineer Department, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing, (P. R. China)
,
Ping-Kai Ou-Yang
1   Biology and Pharmacy Engineer Department, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing, (P. R. China)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 November 2011 (online)

Abstract

The bioavailability of clopidogrel bisulfate (CAS 135046-48-9) form I was compared with that of Clopidogrel bisulfate form II in 12 male Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats, randomly divided into two groups, received a single oral dose of 8 mg/kg Clopidogrel (CP) bisulfate form I and form II, respectively, under fasting condition. The plasma concentrations of CP and its inactive carboxylic acid metabolite (CAS 144457-28-3, IM) were simultaneously determined by a sensitive, specific LC-MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetic parameters included Cmax, Tmax, t1/2, AUC0–t AUC0–∞. The AUC0–∞ of CP was 13.78 ± 0.67 and 11.46 ± 1.98 ng/mL · h for CP form I and form II, respectively. The AUC0–∞ of IM was 33.08 ± 5.76 and 21.67 ± 8.95 μg/mL · h for CP form I and form II, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of CP was 3.81 ± 0.54 ng/mL for CP form I and 3.18 ± 0.31 ng/mL for CP form II, the Cmax of IM was 3.42 ± 0.41 and 2.08 ± 0.68 μg/mL for the CP form I and form II, respectively. There was an obvious difference between form I and form II for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration time curve for both CP and IM after a t-test. This study shows that CP form I has better bioavailability in rats than CP form II.

 
  • References

  • 1 Savi P, Herbert JM, Pflieger AM, Dol F, Delebassee D, Combalbert J et al. Importance of hepatic metabolism in the antiaggregating activity of the thienopyridine clopidogrel. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992; 44 (3) 527-32
  • 2 Diener HC, Ringleb PA, Savi P. Clopidogrel for the secondary prevention of stroke. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005; 6 (5) 755-64
  • 3 Savia P, Herbert JM, Pfliegera AM, Dola F, Delebasseea D, Combalberta J et al. Importance of hepatic metabolism in the antiaggregating activity of the thienopyridine clopidogrel. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992; 44 (3) 527-32
  • 4 Caplain H, Donat F, Gaud C, Necciari J. Pharmacokinetics of Clopidogrel. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999; 25 (02) 25-8
  • 5 Pereillo JM, Maftouh M, Andrieu A, Uzabiaga MF, Fedeli O, Savi P et al. structure and stereochemistry of the active metabolite of Clopidogrel. Drug Metab Dispos. 2002; 30 (11) 1288-95
  • 6 Singhal D, Curatolo W.. Drug polymorphism and dosage form design: a practical perspective. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2004; 56: 335-47
  • 7 Lifshits-Liron R, Kovalevski-Ishai E, Wizel S, Avhar-Maydar S, Lidor-Hadas R. Kenyon & Kenyon. Polymorphs of Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate, United States patent US 0225129 2003 Dec 4
  • 8 Lohray BB, Lohray VB, Pandey B, Dave MG. Nixon & Vanderhye. Polymorphs and amorphous form of (s)-(+)-clopidogrel bisulfate. United States patent US 0037842 2007 Feb 15
  • 9 Singh SS, Sharma K, Barot D, Mohan PR, Lohray VB.. Estimation of carboxylic acid metabolite of Clopidogrel in Wistar rat plasma by HPLC and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005; 821 (2) 173-80
  • 10 US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical Method Validation 2001
  • 11 Rouini MR, Ardakani YH, Foroumadi A, Lavasani H, Hakemi L. Sensitive Quantification of carboxylic acid metabolite of Clopidogrel in human plasma by LC with UV detection. Chromatographia 2009; 70: 953-56
  • 12 Souri E, Jalalizadeh H, Kebriaee-Zadeh A, Dalvandi MSA. Validated HPLC method for determination of carboxylic acid metabolite of Clopidogrel in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. Biomed Chromatogr. 2006; 1309: 14
  • 13 Nirogi RVS, Kandikere VN, Shukla M, Mudigonda K, Maurya S et al. Quantification of Clopidogrel in human plasma by sensitive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006; 20: 1695-1700
  • 14 Shin BS, Yoo SD. Determination of Clopidogrel in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry: application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study. Biomed Chromatogr. 2007; 21: 883-9
  • 15 Ksycinska H, Rudzki P, Bukowska-Kiliszek M. Determination of Clopidogrel metabolite (SR26334) in human plasma by LC–MS. J Pharm Biomed. 2006; 41: 533-9
  • 16 Zou JJ, Fan HW, Guo DQ, Li YB, Lin S, Zhu YB et al. Simultaneous determination of Clopidogrel and its carboxylic acid metabolite (SR26334) in human plasma by LC–ESI–MS–MS: application to the therapeutic drug monitoring of Clopidogrel. Chromatographia 2009; 70: 1581-6
  • 17 Takahashi M, Pang H, Kawabata K, Farid NA, Kurihara A.. Quantitative determination of Clopidogrel active metabolite in human plasma by LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008; 48 (4) 1219-24
  • 18 Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM. Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2003; 75 (13) 3019-30
  • 19 Aaltonen J, Allesø M, Mirza S, Koradia V, Gordon KC, Rantanen J. Solid form screening. A review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009; 71: 23-7