Arzneimittelforschung 2010; 60(2): 76-80
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296252
Antihypertensives
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of two brands of valsartan tablets in healthy male volunteers

Parvin Zakeri-Milani
1   Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, (Iran)
2   Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, (Iran)
,
Hadi Valizadeh
1   Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, (Iran)
3   Research Center for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, (Iran)
,
Ziba Islambulchilar
1   Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, (Iran)
4   Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, (Iran)
,
Mahboob Nemati
1   Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, (Iran)
5   Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, (Iran)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 December 2011 (online)

Abstract

Valsartan (CAS 137862-53-4) is an antihypertensive drug belonging to the family of angiotensin II receptor antagonists acting at the AT1 receptor, which mediates all known effects of angiotensin II on the cardiovascular system. In the present study, the pharmacokinetic parameters of two oral formulations of valsartan tablets were compared in a randomized, single oral dose, two-treatment crossover design in 24 healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions. After an overnight fast, the volunteers received 80 mg valsartan. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h and drug concentrations were determined by a reverse-phase HPLC method with fluorescence detection. Various pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the plasma concentration-time curves of both formulations. The obtained values for test and reference products were 3 067.7 ± 1 281.7 and 3 304.3 ± 1 196.4 ng/ml for Cmax; 17 834.4 ± 7 083.8 and 18319.1 ± 7 800.7 ng · h/ml for AUC0–48; 18825.7 ± 7 553.2 and 19 172.2 ± 8 307.2 ng · h/ml for AUC0–∞, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals obtained by analysis of variance were 86.84–100.87% for Cmax and 93.43–115.54% for AUC0–t, which are within the acceptance range of 80–125%. Therefore it can be concluded that both products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption and therefore interchangeable.

 
  • References

  • 1 Li H, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Tang Y, Wang J, Zhao L et al. A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007; 852 (1–2)) 436-42
  • 2 Remuzzi A, Perico N, Remuzzi G.. Pharmacological and clinical profile of valsartan. Drugs Today (Barc). 1998; 34 (11) 973-986
  • 3 Nie J, Zhang M, Fan Y, Wen Y, Xiang B, Feng YQ. Biocompatible in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled to HPLC for the determination of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in human plasma and urine. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005; 828 (1–2) 62-9
  • 4 van Zwieten PA. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AT1 blockers, ARBs, Sartans): similarities and differences. Netherlands Heart J. 2006; 14 (11) 381-7
  • 5 Yan J, Wang W, Chen L, Chen S. Electrochemical behavior of valsartan and its determination in capsules. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2008; 67 (2) 205-9
  • 6 Koseki N, Kawashita H, Hara H, Niina M, Tanaka M, Kawai R et al. Development and validation of a method for quantitative determination of valsartan in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007; 43 (5) 1769-74
  • 7 Flynn JT, Meyers KE, Neto JP, dePaulaMeneses R, Zurowska A, Bagga A et al. Efficacy and safety of the Angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan in children with hypertension aged 1 to 5 years. Hypertension. 2008; 52 (2) 222-8
  • 8 IsrailiZ H. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2000; 14 (01) S73-86
  • 9 Flesch G, Muller R, Lloyd P. Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997; 52 (2) 115-20
  • 10 Waldmeier F, Flesch G, Muller R, Winkler T, Kriemler HP, Bühlmayer R et al. Pharmacokinetic, disposition and bio-transformation of [14C]-radiolabelled valsartan in healthy male volunteers after a single oral dose. Xenobiotica. 1997; 27 (1) 59-71
  • 11 Sweetman S. Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2007
  • 12 Macek J, Klima J, Ptacek P. Rapid determination of valsartan in human plasma by protein precipitation and high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Anαlyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006; 832 (1) 169-72
  • 13 Zakeri-Milani P, Barzegar-Jalali M, Tajerzadeh H, Azarmi Y, Valizadeh H. Simultaneous determination of naproxen, ketoprofen and phenol red in samples from rat intestinal permeability studies: HPLC method development and validation. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005; 39 (3–4) 624-30
  • 14 Valizadeh H, Zakeri-Milani P, Islambulchilar Z, Tajerzadeh H. A simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography method for determining furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, and phenol red: applicability to intestinal permeability studies. J AOAC Int. 2006; 89 (1) 88-93
  • 15 Nemati M, Valizadeh H, Ansarin M, Ghaderi F. Development of a simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method for determination of glucosamine in pharmaceutical formulations. J AOAC Int. 2007; 90 (2) 354-7
  • 16 Miller JC, Miller JN. Statistics for Analytical Chemistery. Chichester (UK): Ellis Horwood Ltd; 1993
  • 17 FDA Guidance for industry, bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products; General considerations. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) 2003 [cited 2009 May 16]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm070124.pdf
  • 18 Zakeri-Milani P, Valizadeh H. Comparative bioavailability study of two olanzapine formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers. Pharm World Sci. 2008; 30 (5) 702-3
  • 19 Zakeri-Milani P, Valizadeh H, Islambulchilar Z. Comparative bioavailability study of two Cefixime formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung. 2008; 58 (2) 97-100
  • 20 Valizadeh H, Barghi L, Jalilian H, Islambulchilar Z, Zakeri-Milani P. Bioequivalence of fexofenadine tablet formulations assessed in healthy Iranian volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung. 2009; 59 (7) 345-9
  • 21 Zakeri-Milani P, Valizadeh H, Ghanbarzadeh S, Nemati M. Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability study of two clarithromycin suspensions following administration of a single oral dose to healthy volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung. 2009; 59 (8) 429-32
  • 22 Asiri YA, Al-Said MS, Al-Khamis KI, Niazy EM, El-Sayed YM, Al-Rashood KA et al. Comparative bioavailability study of Cefixime (equivalent to 100 mg/5 ml) suspension (Winex vs. Suprax) in healthy male volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 43 (10) 499-504
  • 23 Schall R, Luus HG. Comparison of absorption rates in bioequivalence studies of immediate release drug formulations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992; 30 (5) 153-9