Laryngorhinootologie 2013; 92(05): 347-358
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1341491
CME-Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Funktionelle Weichgaumen­rekonstruktion mit Radialislappen

Functional Soft-palate Reconstruction with Radial Forearm Free Flaps
S. Strieth
,
T. Stöver
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 April 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Oropharynxkarzinome im Bereich des Weichgaumens stellen eine besondere therapeutische Herausforderung dar. Dies liegt an der Funktion des Weichgaumens für Artikulation und Schluckvorgang. Bei der Beratung der Patienten muss das breite Spektrum der Behandlungsmöglichkeiten erwähnt werden, um zu einer mündigen Entscheidungsfindung zu kommen. Grundsätzlich sollten bei der primär kurativen Behandlung multimodale Therapiekonzepte erwogen werden, deren wesentliche Bestandteile chirurgische Resektion und Radiochemotherapie darstellen. Im Hinblick auf die gelegentlich schwierige Vorhersage des funktionellen Ergebnisses nach Primärtherapie, sollte auch ein Stufenplan plastischer Rekonstruktionsmöglichkeiten a priori miterwogen werden. Bei einer Vielzahl lokaler und gestielter Lappenplastiken gehört der freie mikrovaskuläre Radialislappen zum unverzichtbaren chirurgischen Repertoire. Dieser ermöglicht in nahezu idealer Weise eine funktionelle Rehabilitation nach ausgedehnteren Resektionen. Das impliziert einige zusätzliche Aspekte bei der prä- und postoperativen Patientenbetreuung, die in dieser Übersichtsarbeit dargestellt werden.

Abstract

Oropharyngeal cancer of the soft palate is a therapeutic challenge. This is due to crucial importance of velopharyngeal competence for articulation and swallowing. Patient counseling must present the whole therapeutic spectrum in order to receive informed consent. Basically, in primary therapy of oropharyngeal cancer multimodal concepts have to be considered including surgical resection and radiochemotherapy. With regard to the occasional difficulties predicting the functional outcome after primary therapy the ladder of reconstructive options has to be discussed a priori. Among numerous pedicled flaps the radial forearm free flap nowadays belongs definitely in the surgical armoury, which offers almost ideal reconstructive possibilities after extensive resections. This implies some additional aspects in pre- and postoperative workup that are reviewed in this article.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Wollenberg B, Zimmermann F Hrsg Manual Kopf-Hals-Malignome. 3. Aufl. München: Zuckschwerdt Verlag; 2003
  • 2 Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM et al. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 184-194
  • 3 Ragin CC, Taioli E. Survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in relation to human papillomavirus infection: review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2007; 121: 1813-1820
  • 4 Klussmann JP, Preuss SF, Speel EJ. Human papillomavirus and cancer of the oropharynx. Molecular interaction and clinical implications. HNO 2009; 57: 113-122
  • 5 Bootz F, Becker D, Fliesek J. Functional results and survival probability of tumor patients after reconstruction of the mouth cavity and oropharynx using a microvascular radial forearm flap. HNO 1993; 41: 380-384
  • 6 Tawfik AM, Kerl JM, Bauer RW et al. Dual-energy CT of head and neck cancer: average weighting of low- and high-voltage acquisitions to improve lesion delineation and image quality-initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2012; 47: 306-311
  • 7 Myers LL, Sumer BD, Truelson JM et al. Resection and free tissue reconstruction of locally advanced oral cancer: avoidance of lip split. Microsurgery 2011; 31: 347-352
  • 8 Dietzsch S, Melzer R, Boehm A et al. Treatment related swallowing dysfunction and the potentialities of IMRT. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2011; 90: 657-662
  • 9 Zohar Y, Buler N, Shvilli Y et al. Reconstruction of the soft palate by uvulopalatal flap. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 47-50
  • 10 Gillespie MB, Eisele DW. The uvulopalatal flap for reconstruction of the soft palate. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 612-615
  • 11 Gullane PJ, Arena S. Extended palatal island mucoperiosteal flap. Arch Otolaryngol 1985; 111: 330-332
  • 12 Licameli GR, Dolan R. Buccinator musculomucosal flap: applications in intraoral reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124: 69-72
  • 13 Zeitels SM, Kim J. Soft-palate reconstruction with a “SCARF” superior-constrictor advancement-rotation flap. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1136-1140
  • 14 Hüttenbrink KB. The temporalis muscle fascia flap for covering defects in the oropharynx. Report of 4 years experiences with 26 cases. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1989; 68: 272-277
  • 15 Remmert S, Majocco A, Gehrking E. Neurovascular infrahyoid myofascial flap. Anatomic-topographic study of innervation and vascular supply. HNO 1995; 43: 182-187
  • 16 Remmert S, Sommer K, Krappen S et al. Plastic reconstructive surgery of soft palate defects – functional and oncological aspects. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1997; 76: 169-177
  • 17 Wolff KD, Kesting M, Thurmuller P et al. The early use of a perforator flap of the lateral lower limb in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 602-607
  • 18 Gehrking E, Remmert S, Majocco A. Lateral upper arm flap: topographic-anatomic study for clinical use as vascular pedicled transplant. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1995; 74: 317-321
  • 19 Wax MK, Rosenthal EL, Winslow CP et al. The ulnar fasciocutaneous free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 2155-2160
  • 20 Ninkovic M, Harpf C, Schwabegger AH et al. The lateral arm flap. Clin Plast Surg 2001; 28: 367-374
  • 21 Muhlbauer W, Herndl E, Stock W. The forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 70: 336-344
  • 22 Sabri A. Oropharyngeal reconstruction: current state of the art. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11: 251-254
  • 23 Bootz F. The free forearm flap in covering defects of the pharynx and oral cavity. HNO 1988; 36: 462-466
  • 24 Urken ML. Targeted sensory restoration to the upper aerodigestive tract with physiologic implications. Head Neck 2004; 26: 287-293
  • 25 Remmert S, Sommer K. More reliable assessment of hand blood circulation by the modified Allen test in removal of a pedicled radialis flap. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1993; 72: 268-269
  • 26 Reiter M, Kapsreiter M, Betz CS et al. Perioperative management of antithrombotic medication in head and neck reconstruction – a retrospective analysis of 137 patients. Am J Otolaryngol 2012; 33: 693-696
  • 27 Digonnet A, Hamoir M, Andry G et al. Post-therapeutic surveillance strategies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2172-7.
  • 28 Gunzel T, Schimmer M. Quality of life after primary radiation/radiochemotherapy vs. operation therapy in an oropharyngeal cancer. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2012; 91: 451-456
  • 29 Tschiesner U, Schuster L, Strieth S et al. Functional outcome in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: surgery and reconstruction with free flaps versus primary radiochemotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1642-7.
  • 30 Tschiesner U, Stier-Jarmer M, Strieth S et al. Development of an ICF-based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment of Function in Head and Neck Cancer. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2013; DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1333235.