Center Variation in the Delivery of Indicated Late Preterm Births

Abstract

Objective Evidence for optimal timing of delivery for some pregnancy complications at late preterm gestation is limited. The purpose of this study was to identify center variation of indicated late preterm births.

Study design We performed an analysis of singleton late preterm and term births from a large U.S. retrospective obstetrical cohort. Births associated with spontaneous preterm labor, major congenital anomalies, chorioamnionitis, and emergency cesarean were excluded. We used modified Poisson fixed effects logistic regression with interaction terms to assess center variation of indicated late preterm births associated with four medical/obstetric comorbidities after adjusting for socio-demographics, comorbidities, and hospital/provider characteristics.

Results We identified 150,055 births from 16 hospitals; 9,218 were indicated late preterm births. We found wide variation of indicated late preterm births across hospitals. The extent of center variation was greater for births associated with preterm premature rupture of membranes (risk ratio [RR] across sites: 0.45–3.05), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (RR across sites: 0.36–1.27), and placenta previa/abruption (RR across sites: 0.48–1.82). We found less center variation for births associated with diabetes (RR across sites: 0.65–1.39).

Conclusion Practice variation in the management of indicated late preterm deliveries might be a source of preventable late preterm birth.

Keywords

late preterm birth - preterm birth - center variation - practice variation

• References

• 1 Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman M, Curtin SC. Births: preliminary data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2014; 63 (2)
• 2 Engle WA, Tomashek KM, Wallman C ; Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. “Late-preterm” infants: a population at risk. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (6) 1390-1401
• 3 Bird TM, Bronstein JM, Hall RW, Lowery CL, Nugent R, Mays GP. Late preterm infants: birth outcomes and health care utilization in the first year. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (2) e311-e319
• 4 Bérard A, Le Tiec M, De Vera MA. Study of the costs and morbidities of late-preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97 (5) F329-F334
• 5 Escobar GJ, Greene JD, Hulac P , et al. Rehospitalisation after birth hospitalisation: patterns among infants of all gestations. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90 (2) 125-131
• 6 Morse SB, Zheng H, Tang Y, Roth J. Early school-age outcomes of late preterm infants. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (4) e622-e629
• 7 Petrini JR, Dias T, McCormick MC, Massolo ML, Green NS, Escobar GJ. Increased risk of adverse neurological development for late preterm infants. J Pediatr 2009; 154 (2) 169-176
• 8 Chyi LJ, Lee HC, Hintz SR, Gould JB, Sutcliffe TL. School outcomes of late preterm infants: special needs and challenges for infants born at 32 to 36 weeks gestation. J Pediatr 2008; 153 (1) 25-31
• 9 Teune MJ, Bakhuizen S, Gyamfi Bannerman C , et al. A systematic review of severe morbidity in infants born late preterm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (4) 374.e1-374.e9
• 10 Laughon SK, Reddy UM, Sun L, Zhang J. Precursors for late preterm birth in singleton gestations. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (5) 1047-1055
• 11 Reddy UM, Ko CW, Raju TN, Willinger M. Delivery indications at late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (1) 234-240
• 12 Holland MG, Refuerzo JS, Ramin SM, Saade GR, Blackwell SC. Late preterm birth: how often is it avoidable?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (4) 404.e1-404.e4
• 13 Lubow JM, How HY, Habli M, Maxwell R, Sibai BM. Indications for delivery and short-term neonatal outcomes in late preterm as compared with term births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200 (5) e30-e33
• 14 McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Neonatal mortality and morbidity rates in late preterm births compared with births at term. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111 (1) 35-41
• 15 Riley LE, Stark AR eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 7th ed. Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics and The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2012
• 16 Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (2, Pt 1): 323-333
• 17 Clark SL, Belfort MA, Hankins GD, Meyers JA, Houser FM. Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (6) 526.e1-526.e5
• 18 Thompson LA, Goodman DC, Chang CH, Stukel TA. Regional variation in rates of low birth weight. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (5) 1114-1121
• 19 Eichenwald EC, Blackwell M, Lloyd JS, Tran T, Wilker RE, Richardson DK. Inter-neonatal intensive care unit variation in discharge timing: influence of apnea and feeding management. Pediatrics 2001; 108 (4) 928-933
• 20 Berry JG, Toomey SL, Zaslavsky AM , et al. Pediatric readmission prevalence and variability across hospitals. JAMA 2013; 309 (4) 372-380
• 21 Wennberg JE. Tracking Medicine: A Researcher's Quest to Understand Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010
• 22 Goodman DC. Unwarranted variation in pediatric medical care. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009; 56 (4) 745-755
• 23 MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Zhang J. Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991–2006. Am J Public Health 2010; 100 (11) 2241-2247
• 24 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD , et al. Births: Final Data for 2006. Contract No. 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2009
• 25 Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Sutton PD. Are Preterm Births on the Decline in the United States? Recent Data from the National Vital Statistics System. NCHS Data Brief. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010: 1-8
• 26 Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (4) 326.e1-326.e10
• 27 Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159 (7) 702-706
• 28 Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2011
• 29 Oshiro BT, Henry E, Wilson J, Branch DW, Varner MW ; Women and Newborn Clinical Integration Program. Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (4) 804-811
• 30 Donovan EF, Lannon C, Bailit J, Rose B, Iams JD, Byczkowski T ; Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative Writing Committee. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0/7)-38(6/7) weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (3) 243.e1-243.e8
• 31 Fisch JM, English D, Pedaline S, Brooks K, Simhan HN. Labor induction process improvement: a patient quality-of-care initiative. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (4) 797-803
• 32 Glantz JC. Labor induction rate variation in upstate New York: what is the difference?. Birth 2003; 30 (3) 168-174
• 33 Aliaga SR, Smith PB, Price WA , et al. Regional variation in late preterm births in North Carolina. Matern Child Health J 2013; 17 (1) 33-41
• 34 Aliaga S, Boggess K, Ivester TS, Price WA. Influence of neonatal practice variation on outcomes of late preterm birth. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (8) 659-666
• 35 Aliaga S, Price W, McCaffrey M, Ivester T, Boggess K, Tolleson-Rinehart S. Practice variation in late-preterm deliveries: a physician survey. J Perinatol 2013; 33 (5) 347-351
• 36 Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Fuchs KM, Young OM, Hoffman MK. Nonspontaneous late preterm birth: etiology and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (5) 456.e1-456.e6
• 37 Buchanan SL, Crowther CA, Levett KM, Middleton P, Morris J. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (3) CD004735
• 38 van der Ham DP, van der Heyden JL, Opmeer BC , et al. Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: the PPROMEXIL-2 trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (4) 276.e1-276.e10