Digestive Disease Interventions 2021; 05(03): 249-259
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731363
Review Article

TaTME: Present and Future Perspectives?

A. M. Otero-Piñeiro
1   Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
,
R. Bravo
1   Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
,
A. M. Lacy
1   Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a new procedure developed to overcome the specific difficulties posed by rectal surgery, especially in narrow pelvis, male, and obese patients, and can be used in benign and malignant pathologies. The advantages are especially important in rectal cancer, as they could potentially result in a more precise distal dissection, lower rate of positive circumferential resection margins, and increase the rate of sphincter-sparing procedures. The indications for TaTME are currently expanding, despite not yet being standardized. Training programs are increasing day by day, to improve the learning curve related to this difficult technique. The procedure is feasible and safe with similar intraoperative complications and readmission rates compared with open/laparoscopic approach. Oncological results have shown that TaTME is associated with better quality mesorectal excision and safer distal resection margin. In this work, we review the evolution of TaTME, surgical technique, development, applicability, current situation, and implementation, as well as future perspectives for colorectal cancer and other pathologies. While satisfactory short-term results have been reported, it is a new technique, and long-term results and definitive results from controlled trials are pending. As evidence of safety and feasibility accumulates, training programs structured to standardize teaching, training, and safe expansion will aid the safe spread of TaTME.



Publication History

Received: 06 October 2020

Accepted: 06 April 2021

Article published online:
25 June 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H. et al; MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365 (9472): 1718-1726
  • 2 Anderson C, Uman G, Pigazzi A. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34 (10) 1135-1142
  • 3 Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Saito N. Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23 (07) 703-707
  • 4 Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (09) 2200-2205
  • 5 Parks AG. A technique for the removal of large villous tumours in the rectum. Proc R Soc Med 1970; 63 (Suppl. 01) 89-91
  • 6 Morson BC, Bussey HJ, Samoorian S. Policy of local excision for early cancer of the colorectum. Gut 1977; 18 (12) 1045-1050
  • 7 Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J. et al. A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg 1984; 55 (10) 677-680
  • 8 Ooi BS, Quah HM, Fu CW, Eu KW. Laparoscopic high anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for early rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2009; 13 (01) 61-64
  • 9 Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (05) 1205-1210
  • 10 Lacy AM, Tasende MM, Delgado S. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: outcomes after 140 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221 (02) 415-423
  • 11 Fernández-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (02) 221-227
  • 12 Adamina M, Buchs NC, Penna M, Hompes R. St.Gallen Colorectal Consensus Expert Group. St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (03) 1091-1103
  • 13 Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S. et al; TaTME Registry Collaborative. Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (01) 111-117
  • 14 Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanström LL. Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (10) 1870-1874
  • 15 Arroyave MC, DeLacy FB, Lacy AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: step by step description of the surgical technique for a two-teams approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43 (02) 502-505
  • 16 Koedam TW, van Ramshorst GH, Deijen CL. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (01) 25-33
  • 17 Trépanier JS, Fernandez-Hevia M, Lacy AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision: surgical technique description and outcomes. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2016; 25 (05) 234-240
  • 18 Francis N, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Carter F, Hompes R. International TaTME Educational Collaborative Group. Consensus on structured training curriculum for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (07) 2711-2719
  • 19 Atallah S, Mabardy A, Volpato AP, Chin T, Sneider J, Monson JRT. Surgery beyond the visible light spectrum: theoretical and applied methods for localization of the male urethra during transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (06) 413-424
  • 20 Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J. et al. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (03) 558-568
  • 21 Heald RJ. A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17 (03) 257-258
  • 22 Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC, Carrere S. et al. Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 408-415
  • 23 Velthuis S, Nieuwenhuis DH, Ruijter TEG, Cuesta MA, Bonjer HJ, Sietses C. Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (12) 3494-3499
  • 24 Bravo R, Trépanier JS, Arroyave MC, Fernández-Hevia M, Pigazzi A, Lacy AM. Combined transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) with laparoscopic instruments and abdominal robotic surgery in rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (03) 233-235
  • 25 Gómez Ruiz M, Parra IM, Palazuelos CM. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (01) 145-153
  • 26 Monsellato I, Morello A, Prati M. et al. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a new perspective for low rectal cancer treatment. A case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019; 61: 86-90
  • 27 Hompes R, Rauh SM, Ris F, Tuynman JB, Mortensen NJ. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms. Br J Surg 2014; 101 (05) 578-581
  • 28 Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Pinan J. et al. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18 (11) 1047-1053
  • 29 Huscher CG, Bretagnol F, Ponzano C. Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision: the key against the Achilles' heel of rectal cancer?. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (05) e120-e121
  • 30 Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Tong YS, Chen CC. Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (02) 249-254
  • 31 Verheijen PM, Consten EC, Broeders IA. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: experience with a first case. Int J Med Robot 2014; 10 (04) 423-426
  • 32 Atallah S. Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): Could this be the solution we have been searching for?. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (10) 809-814
  • 33 Emile SH, de Lacy FB, Keller DS. et al. Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: from top to bottom. World J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 10 (03) 28-39
  • 34 Lee GC, Sylla P. Shifting paradigms in minimally invasive surgery: applications of transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2015; 28 (03) 181-193
  • 35 de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C. et al. Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)--short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (09) 3165-3172
  • 36 Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D. et al. A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (09) 3396-3405
  • 37 Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ. et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314 (13) 1346-1355
  • 38 Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW. et al; ALaCaRT Investigators. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314 (13) 1356-1363
  • 39 Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery?. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18 (01) 19-36
  • 40 Xu W, Xu Z, Cheng H. et al. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42 (12) 1841-1850
  • 41 Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S. et al; International TaTME Registry Collaborative. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 2019; 269 (04) 700-711
  • 42 de Lacy FB, van Laarhoven JJEM, Pena R. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (05) 2442-2447
  • 43 Helbach MV, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ. et al. Residual mesorectum on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) in rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (01) 94-102
  • 44 de Lacy FB, Roodbeen SX, Ríos J. et al. Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis. BMC Cancer 2020; 20 (01) 677
  • 45 Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (06) 832-838
  • 46 Dumont F, Ayadi M, Goéré D, Honoré C, Elias D. Comparison of fecal continence and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection plus perineal colostomy for ultra-low rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2013; 108 (04) 225-229
  • 47 Rouanet P, Saint-Aubert B, Lemanski C. et al. Restorative and nonrestorative surgery for low rectal cancer after high-dose radiation: long-term oncologic and functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 (03) 305-313 , discussion 313–315
  • 48 Wolthuis AM, de Buck van Overstraeten A, D'Hoore A. Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (36) 12981-12992
  • 49 Atallah SB, DuBose AC, Burke JP. et al. Uptake of transanal total mesorectal excision in North America: initial assessment of a structured training program and the experience of delegate surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (10) 1023-1031
  • 50 Barnes TG, Penna M, Hompes R, Cunningham C. Fluorescence to highlight the urethra: a human cadaveric study. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (06) 439-444
  • 51 Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A. et al. COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (08) 3210-3215
  • 52 Penna M, Hompes R, Mackenzie H, Carter F, Francis NK. First international training and assessment consensus workshop on transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20 (06) 343-352