J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11(02): 67-75
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748012
Original Article

Self-Reported Hearing Handicap and Audiometric Measures in Older Adults

Terry L. Wiley
Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
,
Karen J. Cruickshanks
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
,
David M. Nondahl
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
,
Ted S. Tweed
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

As part of an epidemiologic study of hearing disorders in older adults, audiometric thresholds (250–20,000 Hz), word recognition performance (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 word lists in quiet and in competing message), and Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) scores were evaluated for 3178 adults ranging in age from 48 to 92 years. Overall, higher HHIE-S scores were more prevalent for older age groups and for greater degrees of hearing loss. After adjusting for the degree of hearing loss, the probability of reporting a hearing disability (handicap) decreased with age.

Abbreviations: ANSI = American National Standards Institute, HHIE = Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly, HHIE-S = Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening, NU-6 = Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6, PTA = pure-tone average



Publication History

Article published online:
06 April 2022

© 2000. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • Aldwin CM, Sutton KJ, Chiara G, Spiro A. (1996). Age differences in stress, coping, and appraisal: findings from the Normative Aging Study. J Gerontol 51B:P179–P188.
  • American National Standards Institute. (1989). American National Standard Specification for Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6–1989). New York: ANSI.
  • American National Standards Institute. (1991). American National Standard Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometrie Test Rooms. (ANSI S3.1–1991). New York: ANSI.
  • American National Standards Institute. (1996). American National Standard Specification for Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6–1996). New York: ANSI.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1978). Guidelines for manual pure tone threshold audiometry. ASHA 20:297–301.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1997). Guidelines for audiologic screening. Rockville, MD: ASHA.
  • Bess F. (1995). Applications of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly—Screening Version (HHIE-S). Hear J 48:10, 51–54, 56–57.
  • Bess F, Lichtenstein MJ, Logan SA, Burger MC. (1989). Comparing criteria of hearing impairment in the elderly: a functional approach. J Speech Hear Res 32:795—802.
  • Callileth BR, Lusk EJ, Strouse TB, Miller DS, Brown LL, Cross PA, Tenaglia AN. (1984). Psychosocial status in chronic illness. Ν Engl J Med 311:506–511.
  • Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BEK, Klein R, Mares-Perlman JA, Nondahl DM. (1998). Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, WI: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 148:879–886.
  • Deeg DJH, Kardaun JWPF, Fozard JL. (1996). Health, behavior, and aging. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW, eds. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. 4th Ed. New York: Academic, 129–149.
  • Dening TR, Chi L-Y, Brayne C, Huppert FA, Paykel ES, O'Connor DW. (1998). Changes in self-rated health, disability and contact with services in a very elderly cohort: a 6–year follow-up study. Age Aging 27:23–33.
  • Gates GA, Cooper JC, Kannal WB, Miller NJ. (1990). Hearing in the elderly: The Framingham Cohort, 1983–1985. Ear Hear 11:247–256.
  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
  • Idler EL. (1993). Age differences in self-assessments of health: age changes, cohort differences, or survivorship? J Gerontol 48:S289–S300.
  • Klein R, Klein BEK, Linton KLP (1992). Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 99:933–943.
  • Leventhal EA. (1984). Aging and the perception of illness. Res Aging 6:119–135.
  • Lichtenstein ΜJ, Bess FH, Logan SA. (1988). Diagnostic performance of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Screening Version) against differing definitions of hearing loss. Ear Hear 9:208–211.
  • Mantel N, Haenszel W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Nat Cancer Inst 22:719–748.
  • Martin FN, Champlin CA, Chambers JA. (1998). Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. J Am Acad Audiol 9:95–104.
  • Mencher GT, Gerber SE, McCombe A. (1997). Audiology and Auditory Dysfunction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Mercier C, Peladeau N, Tempier R. (1998). Age, gender and quality of life. Commun Ment Health J 34:487–500.
  • Moscicki EK, Elkins EF, Baum HM, McNamara PM. (1985). Hearing loss in the elderly: an epidemiologic study of the Framingham Heart Study Cohort. Ear Hear 6:184–190.
  • Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BEK. (1998). Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss. Audiology 37:295–301.
  • Popelka MM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BEK, Klein R. (1998). Low prevalence of hearing-aid use among older adults with hearing loss: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:1075–1078.
  • Ries PW (1994). Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States 1990–1991. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics Series 10: Data from the National Health Survey, no. 176.
  • Schow RL. (1991). Considerations in selecting and validating an adult/elderly hearing screening protocol. Ear Hear 12:337–348.
  • Schow RL, Gatehouse S. (1990). Fundamental issues in self-assessment of hearing. Ear Hear 11(5)(Suppl): 6S-16S.
  • Schow RL, Smedley TC, Longhurst TM. (1990). Self-assessment and impairment in adult/elderly hearing screening—recent data and new perspectives. Ear Hear 11(5)(Suppl):17S-27S.
  • Schow RL, Balsara NR, Smedley TC, Whitcomb CJ. (1993). Aural rehabilitation by ASHA audiologists: 1980–1990. Am J Audiol 2(3):28–37.
  • Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. (1982). The Hearing Handicap for the Elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 3(3): 128–134.
  • Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. (1983). Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. Asha 25:37–42.
  • Veterans Administration, Audiology Section, Auditory Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Long Beach, CA (1991). Speech Recognition and Identification Materials, Disc. 1.1. Washington, DC: Medical Research Service Rehabilitation Research and Development Center.
  • Weinstein BE. (1984). A review of hearing handicap scales. Audiology 9:91–109.
  • Weinstein BE. (1986). Validity of a screening protocol for identifying elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA 28(5):41–45.
  • Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. (1982). Assessing hearing handicap in the elderly. Hear Aid J Jan:35(1):17–20.
  • Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. (1983). Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. J Speech Hear Disord 48:379–384.
  • Weinstein BE, Spitzer JB, Ventry IM. (1986). Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Ear Hear 7:295–299.
  • Weinstein BE, Richards AM, Montano J. (1995). Handicap versus impairment: an important distinction. J Am Acad Audiol 6:250–255.
  • Wiley TL, Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BEK. (1998). Aging and high-frequency hearing sensitivity. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:1061–1072.