Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769506
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in Pre-diabetes
Funding We received no external funding for the project. Institutional infrastructure was provided by Mahesh Bhattacharyya Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital.
Abstract
Background Pre-diabetes (PD) contributes importantly to the disease burden worldwide and is a precursor to stroke, cardiovascular diseases, as well as type-2 diabetes mellitus.
Objective In this project, the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) was explored against placebos in the treatment of PD.
Methods A 6-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the outpatient departments of a homeopathic medical college and hospital in India. Sixty participants with PD were randomized to receive either IHMs (n = 30) or identical-looking placebos (n = 30). Concomitant care measures were advised to both groups of participants in terms of dietary advice, yoga, meditation and exercise. The primary outcome measures were fasting blood sugar (FBS) and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); the secondary outcome was the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) score. All the outcomes were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Inter-group differences and effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance models after adjusting baseline differences using analysis of co-variance on the intention-to-treat data.
Results Between-group differences for FBS were statistically significant, favoring IHMs against placebos (F 1,58 = 7.798, p = 0.007), but not for OGTT (F 1,58 = 1.691, p = 0.199). The secondary outcome, DSC-R total score, favoring IHMs significantly compared with placebos (F 1,58 = 15.752, p < 0.001). Calcarea Carbonicum, Thuja occidentalis and Sulphur were the most frequently prescribed medicines. No harm or serious adverse events were recorded from either of the participant groups.
Conclusion IHMs produced significantly better results than placebos in FBS and in DSC-R scores but not in OGTT. Independent replications with larger sample sizes are warranted to substantiate the findings.
Trial registration CTRI/2019/10/021711
Authors' Contribution
N.G., M.S., S.G., S.M., A.D.D., C.P., P.G., M.K. and S.S.: concept and literature search. N.G., S.M., A.D.D. and C.P.: clinical study and data acquisition. P.G., M.K. and S.S. concept, study design, data interpretation, statistical analysis, and preparation of the article. All the authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Publication History
Received: 09 February 2023
Accepted: 22 March 2023
Article published online:
26 June 2023
© 2023. Faculty of Homeopathy. This article is published by Thieme.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL. et al. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Vol. 2. 19th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2015
- 2 Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Einhorn D. et al. Diagnosis and management of prediabetes in the continuum of hyperglycemia: when do the risks of diabetes begin? A consensus statement from the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Endocr Pract 2008; 14: 933-946
- 3 Cai X, Zhang Y, Li M. et al. Association between prediabetes and risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: updated meta-analysis. BMJ 2020; 370: m2297
- 4 Adam G, . Tabák, Herder C, Rathmann W. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for developing diabetes. Lancet 2012; 379: 2279-2290
- 5 Rowley WR, Bezold C, Arikan Y, Byrne E, Krohe S. Diabetes 2030: insights from yesterday, today, and future trends. Popul Health Manag 2017; 20: 6-12
- 6 Secondary IDF Diabetes Atlas. . 6th ed. 2013. Accessed March 21, 2022 at: http://www.Idf.Org/Diabetesatlas
- 7 Kumar P, Mallik D, Mukhopadhyay DK, Sinhababu A, Mahapatra BS, Chakrabarti P. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and its correlates among police personnel in Bankura District of West Bengal. Indian J Public Health 2013; 57: 24-28
- 8 Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010; 87: 4-14
- 9 Kumpatla S, Kothandan H, Tharkar S, Viswanathan V. The costs of treating long-term diabetic complications in a developing country: a study from India. J Assoc Physicians India 2013; 61: 102-109
- 10 Brannick B, Dagogo-Jack S. Prediabetes and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology and interventions for prevention and risk reduction. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2018; 47: 33-50
- 11 Alzahrani AS, Price MJ, Greenfield SM, Paudyal V. Global prevalence and types of complementary and alternative medicines use amongst adults with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77: 1259-1274
- 12 Ghosh S, Chattopadhyay B, Koley M. et al. Plant extracts as add-on therapeutics in homeopathy: An open-label, randomized trial using mother tinctures in prediabetes. J Integr Complement Med 2022; 28: 757-767
- 13 Kumar GV, Chitra V, Gupta P. et al. Preclinical updates of the homoeopathic medicines used in diabetes mellitus: a narrative review. Indian J Res Homoeopathy. 2021; 15: 31-40
- 14 Mehra P, Sharma B, Baig H. et al. Efficacy of homoeopathic treatment for diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy: a multicentric randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Explore (NY) 2021; 17: 417-423
- 15 Nayak C, Oberai P, Varanasi R. et al. A prospective multi-centric open clinical trial of homeopathy in diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Homeopathy 2013; 102: 130-138
- 16 Mohan V, Deepa R, Deepa M, Somannavar S, Datta M. A simplified Indian Diabetes Risk Score for screening for undiagnosed diabetic subjects. J Assoc Physicians India 2005; 53: 759-763
- 17 American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010; 33 (Suppl. 01) S62-S69
- 18 Arbuckle RA, Humphrey L, Vardeva K. et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)—a measure of symptom distress. Value Health 2009; 12: 1168-1175
- 19 IBM SPSS. Statistics for Windows. Version 20.0; released 2011. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp;
- 20 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c332
- 21 Dean ME, Coulter MK, Fisher P, Jobst K, Walach H. Reporting data on homeopathic treatments (RedHot): a supplement to CONSORT. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 42-45
- 22 Spieth PM, Kubasch AS, Penzlin AI, Illigens BM, Barlinn K, Siepmann T. Randomized controlled trials—a matter of design. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2016; 12: 1341-1349
- 23 Hahnemann CFS. Organon of Medicine. 5th ed., 2002, 12th impression 2018. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers Pvt. Ltd.; Aphorism 161, footnote 2, p. 98
- 24 Roberts HA. Principles and art of cure by homoeopathy. Ch. VIII. In: Taking the Case. Reprint ed. New Delhi: Indian Books and Periodicals Publishers; 2006. :78
- 25 Pomposelli R, Piasere V, Andreoni C. et al. Observational study of homeopathic and conventional therapies in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. Homeopathy 2009; 98: 17-25
- 26 To KLA, Fok YYY, Chong KCM, Lee YCJ, Yiu LSS. Individualized homeopathic treatment in addition to conventional treatment in type II diabetic patients in Hong Kong—a retrospective cohort study. Homeopathy 2017; 106: 79-86
- 27 Wadhwani G. Constitutional homeopathic treatment in cases of pre-diabetes and insulin resistance at a primary health center: a feasibility study. Homeopathy 2020; 109: A27
- 28 Hempel CJ. The Science of Therapeutics, according to the Principles of Homoeopathy by Bernard Baehr. Vol. II. New York: Boericke & Tafel; 1870