Download PDF
Digestive Disease Interventions 2023; 07(04): 273-279
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771311
Review Article

Liver Biopsy and Pressure Hemodynamics: IR Perspective

Aakash Jain
1   Department of Radiology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
,
Joseph A. Hughes III 
1   Department of Radiology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
,
Sidhartha Tavri
2   Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Liver biopsy is important for staging of liver disease and cirrhosis and can be performed by many techniques. While percutaneous biopsy is fast, safe, effective, and widely available, transvenous biopsy, most often performed from the transjugular approach, offers many advantages for selected patients. In the setting of suspected or confirmed portal hypertension, transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB), most commonly performed by interventional radiologists, can be used to simultaneously obtain core biopsies of the liver and measure hemodynamic pressures in the right atrium, hepatic vein, and portal vein to calculate a hepatic venous pressure gradient. TJLB can be performed safely when percutaneous biopsy is contraindicated, including in the setting of ascites, coagulopathy, anticoagulation, and other high-risk bleeding situations. The procedure can be performed in the outpatient setting in a short period of time for most patients and without the use of precious anesthesia resources. Hepatic venography also allows for variant anatomy evaluation that may be important in the diagnosis and planning of future procedures, such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Keywords

liver biopsy transjugular liver biopsy - hepatic venous pressure gradient - chronic liver disorder


Publication History

Received: 20 March 2023

Accepted: 17 June 2023

Article published online:
31 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Behrens G, Ferral H. Transjugular liver biopsy. Semin Intervent Radiol 2012; 29 (02) 111-117
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tannapfel A, Dienes HP, Lohse AW. The indications for liver biopsy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109 (27-28): 477-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jain D, Torres R, Celli R, Koelmel J, Charkoftaki G, Vasiliou V. Evolution of the liver biopsy and its future. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6: 20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dotter CT. Catheter biopsy. Experimental technique for transvenous liver biopsy. Radiology 1964; 82: 312-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hanafee W, Weiner M. Transjugular percutaneous cholangiography. Radiology 1967; 88 (01) 35-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dohan A, Guerrache Y, Boudiaf M, Gavini JP, Kaci R, Soyer P. Transjugular liver biopsy: indications, technique and results. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95 (01) 11-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ferral H, Fimmel CJ, Sonnenberg A, Alonzo MJ, Aquisto TM. Transjugular liver biopsy with hemodynamic evaluation: correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient and histologic diagnosis of cirrhosis. J Clin Imaging Sci 2021; 11: 25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 García-Compean D, Cortés C. Transjugular liver biopsy: an update. Ann Hepatol 2004; 3 (03) 100-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dey S, Chatterjee A, Dutta A, Ghosh R, Dasgupta J. Yield and safety of transjugular versus percutaneous liver biopsies in suspected cases of diffuse liver disease and correlation of yield of transjugular liver biopsy with hepatic venous pressure gradient. J Gastrointest Abdom Radiol 2020; 4 (01) 3-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Beckmann MG, Bahr MJ, Hadem J. et al. Clinical relevance of transjugular liver biopsy in comparison with percutaneous and laparoscopic liver biopsy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2009; 2009: 947014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Keshava SN, Mammen T, Surendrababu N, Moses V. Transjugular liver biopsy: What to do and what not to do. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2008; 18 (03) 245-248
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy -- indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications -- a systematic review. J Hepatol 2007; 47 (02) 284-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dohan A, Guerrache Y, Dautry R. et al. Major complications due to transjugular liver biopsy: incidence, management and outcome. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015; 96 (06) 571-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions - Part II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1168-1184.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bazarbashi AN, Ryou M. Portal pressure measurement: Have we come full circle?. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93 (03) 573-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ferral H, Schepis F, Gaba RC. et al. Endovascular assessment of liver hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis complicated by portal hypertension. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34 (03) 327-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Peng R, Wattamwar K, Kuc N, Jagust M, Golowa Y, Cynamon J. Transjugular versus transfemoral transcaval liver biopsy: a single-center experience in 500 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (09) 1394-1400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hirasaki KK, Desai DM, Kuo PC, Newman GE, Smith TP. Transjugular liver biopsy: success rate and complications in liver transplants versus non transplants. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (02) S79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Boyer TD. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: current status. Gastroenterology 2003; 124 (06) 1700-1710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lee E, Kim YJ, Goo DE. et al. Comparison of hepatic venous pressure gradient and endoscopic grading of esophageal varices. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (11) 3212-3219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (9, Pt 2): S199-S202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sue MJ, Lee EW, Saab S. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: safe even in patients with severe coagulopathies and multiple biopsies. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2019; 10 (07) e00063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Reynolds TB, Balfour Jr DC, Levinson DC, Mikkelsen WP, Pattison AC. Comparison of wedged hepatic vein pressure with portal vein pressure in human subjects with cirrhosis. J Clin Invest 1955; 34 (02) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G. et al; Portal Hypertension Collaborative Group. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2007; 133 (02) 481-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sanyal AJ, Harrison SA, Ratziu V. et al. The natural history of advanced fibrosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: data from the simtuzumab trials. Hepatology 2019; 70 (06) 1913-1927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ferrusquía-Acosta J, Bassegoda O, Turco L. et al. Agreement between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal pressure in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2021; 74 (04) 811-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cholongitas E, Quaglia A, Samonakis D. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: how good is it for accurate histological interpretation?. Gut 2006; 55 (12) 1789-1794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Vibhakorn S, Cholongitas E, Kalambokis G. et al. A comparison of four- versus three-pass transjugular biopsy using a 19-G Tru-Cut needle and a randomized study using a cassette to prevent biopsy fragmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32 (03) 508-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ramai D, Pannu V, Facciorusso A. et al. Advances in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided liver biopsy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (04) 784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar