Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2002; 20(1): 037-044
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23518
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Cryopreservation, Thawing, and Transfer of Human Embryos

William Byrd
  • Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 April 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Cryopreservation of human embryos is a routine procedure in most assisted reproductive technology laboratories. Embryos can be successfully frozen at the pronuclear, multicellular (four to eight blastomeres), and blastocyst stages. Each laboratory has to determine which freezing protocol is best suited for its patients. Freezing protocols have been developed that utilize cryoprotective agents such as glycerol, propanediol, dimethylsulfoxide, and sucrose. The purpose of these cryoprotectants is to help reduce the formation of intracellular ice when using a slow cooling protocol to freeze the embryos. The two most common ways to freeze embryos utilize either low concentrations of cryoprotectants and a slow stepwise freeze or high concentrations of cryoprotectants and a rapid freeze. Frozen-thawed embryos can be transferred to naturally cycling women or to women who have been primed with hormone replacement treatment with equal success.

KEYWORD

Cryopreservation - human embryos - vitrification

REFERENCES

  • 1 Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo.  Nature . 1983;  305 707-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control . 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Whittingham D G, Leibo S P, Mazur P. Survival of mouse embryos frozen to -196° and -269°C.  Science . 1972;  178 411-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wilmut I. The effect of cooling rate, warming rate, cryoprotective agent and stage of development on survival of mouse embryos during freezing and thawing.  Life Sci . 1972;  11 1071-1079
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cohen J, Simmons R F, Edwards R G, Fehilly C B, Fishel S B. Pregnancies following the storage of expanding human blastocysts.  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Trans . 1985;  2 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fehilly C B, Cohen J, Simons R F, Fishel S B, Edwards R G. Cryopreservation of cleaving embryos and expanding blastocysts in the human: a comparative study.  Fertil Steril . 1985;  44 638-644
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard J-P. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol.  Fertil Steril . 1985;  44 645-651
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Reubinoff B E, Pera V F, Vajta G, Trounson A O. Effective cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells by open pulled straw vitrification method.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 2187-2194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Landa V, Tepla O. Cryopreservation of mouse 8-cell embryos in microdrops.  Folia Biol (Praha) . 1990;  36 153-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Leibo S P. Procedures to cryopreserve zygotes and embryos.  Hands-on Cryobiology Course. Indianapolis: American Fertility Society 1993: 69-78
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Glenister P H, Whittingham D G, Lyon M F. Further studies on the effect of radiation during the storage of frozen 8-cell mouse embryos at -196°C.  J Reprod Fertil . 1984;  70 229-234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Becker D, Sevilla M D. The chemical consequences of radiation-damage to DNA.  Adv Rad Biol . 1993;  17 121-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tedder R S, Zukerman M A, Goldstone A H. Hepatitis B transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank.  Lancet . 1995;  346 137-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Troup S A, Matson P L, Critchlow J D, Morroll D R, Lieberman B A, Burslem R W. Cryopreservation of human embryos at the pronucleate, early cleavage or expanded blastocyst stages.  Eur J Obstet Gyncol Reprod Biol . 1991;  38 133-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Veeck L L, Amundson C H, Brothman L J. Significantly enhanced pregnancy rates per cycle through cryopreservation and thaw of pronuclear stage oocytes.  Fertil Steril . 1993;  59 1202-1207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Quinn P. Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes. In: Keye WR Jr, Chang RJ, Rebar RW, Soules MR, eds. Infertility, Evaluation and Treatment New York: WB Saunders 1995: 821-840
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Lelaidier C, de Ziegler D, Freitas S, Olivennes F, Hazout A, Frydman R. Endometrium preparation with exogenous estradiol and progesterone for the transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts.  Fertil Steril . 1995;  63 919-921
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Horne G, Critchlow J D, Newman M C, Edozien L, Matson P L, Liberman B A. A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer programme.  Hum Reprod . 1997;  12 542-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kattera S, Shrivastav P, Craft I. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of pronuclear and multicellular stage frozen thawed embryo transfers.  J Assist Reprod Genet . 1999;  16 358-361
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Senn A, Vozzi C, Chanson A, De Grandi P, Germond M. Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  74 946-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rijnders P M, Jansen C A. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 2869-2873
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Graham J, Han T, Porter R, Levy M, Stillman R, Tucker M J. Day 3 morphology is a poor predictor of blastocyst quality in extended culture.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  74 495-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fehilly C B, Cohen J, Simons R F, Fishel S B, Edwards R G. Cryopreservation of cleaving embryos and expanded blastocysts in the human: a comparative study.  Fertil Steril . 1984;  44 638-644
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gardner D K, Lane M. Embryo culture systems In: Trounson A, Gardner DK, eds. Handbook of In Vitro Fertilization. New York: CRC Press; 2000: 85-114
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Van den Abbeel E, Van Steirteghem A. Zona pellucida damage to human embryos after cryopreservation and the consequences for their blastomeres survival and in-vitro viability.  Human Reprod   2000;  15 373-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Magli M C, Gianaroli L, Fortini D, Ferraretti A P, Munne S. Impact of blastomeres biopsy and cryopreservation techniques on human embryo viability.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 770-773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Joris H, Van den Abbell E, Vos A D, Van Steirteghem A. Reduced survival after human embryo biopsy and subsequent cryopreservation.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 2833-2837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kondo I, Suganuma N, Ando T, Furuhashi M, Tomoda Y. Clinical factors for successful cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer.  J Assist Reprod Genet . 1996;  13 201-206
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Van der Elst J, van den Abbeel E, Vitrier S, Camus M, Devroey P, van Steirteghem C A. Selective transfer of cryopreserved embryos with further cleavage after thawing increases delivery and implantation rates.  Hum Reprod . 1997;  12 1513-1521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Edgar D H, Bourne H, Jericho H, McBain J C. The developmental potential of cryopreserved human embryos.  Mol Cell Endocrinol . 2000;  169 69-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Bischof P, Sakkas D. The rate of development and time of transfer play different roles in influencing the viability of human blastocysts.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 676-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Nakayama T, Goto Y, Kanzaki H. Developmental potential of frozen-thawed human blastocysts.  J Asst Reprod Gen . 1995;  12 239-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Tucker M J, Cohen J, Massey J B, Mayer M P, Wiker S R, Wright G. Partial dissection of the zona pellucida of frozen-thawed human embryos may enhance blastocyst hatching, implantation, and pregnancy rates.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1991;  165 341-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Check J H, Hoover L, Nazari A, O'Shaughnessy A, Summers D. The effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy rates after frozen embryo transfer.  Fertil Steril . 1996;  65 254-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mantoudis E, Podsiadly B T, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft I L. A comparison between quarter, partial and total laser assisted hatching in selected infertility patients.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  16 2182-2186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Schmidt C L, de Ziegler D, Gagliardi C L. Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos: the natural cycle versus controlled preparation of the endometrium with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and exogenous estradiol and progesterone (GEEP).  Fertil Steril . 1989;  52 609-616
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sathanandan M, MacNamee M C, Rainsbury P, Wick K, Brendan P, Edwards R G. Replacement of frozen-thawed embryos in artificial and natural cycles: a prospective semi-randomized study.  Hum Reprod . 1991;  6 685-687
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Muasher S J, Kruithoff C, Simometti S, Oehningr S, Acosta A A, Jones G S. Controlled preparation of the endometrium with exogenous steroids for the transfer of frozen-thawed pre-embryos in patients with anovulatory or irregular cycles.  Hum Reprod . 1991;  6 443-445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yee B, Lin Y P, Chacon R R, Soubra S, Rosen G F, Cassidenti D L. A simplified method of timing frozen embryo transfers.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  172 1844-1848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >