Endoscopy 2002; 34(11): 900-904
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35297
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Magnetic Endoscope Imaging: A New Technique for Localizing Colonic Lesions

S.  G.  Shah 1 , H.  J.  Pearson 2 , S.  Moss 2 , E.  Kweka 2 , P.  K.  Jalal 2 , B.  P.  Saunders 1
  • 1Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Diana Princess of Wales Hospital, Grimsby, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 January 2002

Accepted after Revision: 25 April 2002

Publication Date:
13 November 2002 (online)

Background and Study Aims: The precise localization of advanced colorectal lesions preoperatively directs the appropriate surgical management. The use of internal landmarks at colonoscopy can be inaccurate, and other methods are therefore necessary to localize lesions precisely. Magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI), a real-time, nonradiographic technique for imaging of the colonoscope, may assist in determining the location of lesions found at colonoscopy.
Patients and Methods: A prospective study was carried out to determine the accuracy of MEI for localizing the colonoscope tip anatomically. The MEI system was used to identify one of four predetermined locations within the colon. Once identified, two endoscopic marking clips were attached to the colonic mucosa, and 400 - 500 ml of Urografin radiographic contrast medium was injected to produce an air-contrast “enema.” The clips were subsequently localized using plain abdominal radiography, assessed by a single experienced radiologist who was blinded to the colonoscopic findings.
Results: Twenty-nine consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. The overall accuracy of MEI in comparison with the air-contrast “enema” was 90 % (26 of 29 cases). There were three slight errors of localization - clips localized to the descending rather than the sigmoid-descending colon junction (n = 1), or to either side of the mid-transverse (n = 1) and hepatic flexure (n = 1) - but these were not considered to be of surgical or clinical importance.
Conclusions: MEI is a reliable and accurate method for determining the anatomical position of the endoscope tip during colonoscopy. When it becomes commercially available, we believe the use of MEI will avoid the need for unnecessary barium enemas for localization of lesions prior to definitive surgery.

  • 1 Durdey P, Weston P MT, Williams N S. Colonoscopy or barium enema as initial investigation of colonic disease.  Lancet. 1987;  2 549-551
  • 2 Rex D K, Rahmani E Y, Haseman J H. et al . Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 17-23
  • 3 Aldridge M C, Sim A JW. Colonoscopy findings in symptomatic patients without x-ray evidence of colonic neoplasms.  Lancet. 1986;  ii 833-834
  • 4 Tabibian N, Michaletz P A, Schwartz J T. et al . Use of an endoscopically placed clip can avoid diagnostic errors in colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;  34 262-264
  • 5 Hancock J H, Talbot R W. Accuracy of colonoscopy in localisation of colorectal cancer.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;  10 140-141
  • 6 Lam D T, Kwong K H, Lam C W. et al . How useful is colonoscopy in locating colorectal lesions?.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 839-841
  • 7 Vignati P, Welch J P, Cohen J L. Endoscopic localisation of colon cancers.  Surg Endosc. 1994;  8 1085-1087
  • 8 Frager D H, Frager J D, Wolf E L, Beneventano T C. Problems in the colonoscopic localisation of tumours: Continued value of the barium enema.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1987;  12 343-346
  • 9 Monson J RT, Darzi A, Carey P D, Guillou P J. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unresected group of patients.  Lancet. 1990;  340 831-833
  • 10 Wexner S D, Cohen S M, Ulrich A, Reissman P. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Are we being honest with our patients?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 723-727
  • 11 Seaman W B, Wells W J. Complications of the barium enema.  Gastroenterology. 1965;  48 728-737
  • 12 Bladen J S, Anderson A P, Bell G D. et al . Non-radiological technique for three-dimensional imaging of endoscopes.  Lancet. 1993;  341 719-722
  • 13 Saunders B P, Bell G D, Williams C B, Bladen J S, Anderson A P. First clinical results with a real-time electronic imager as an aid to colonoscopy.  Gut. 1995;  36 913-917
  • 14 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Williams C B. et al . Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: A randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2000;  356 1718-1722
  • 15 Waye J D, Bashkoff E. Total colonoscopy: Is it always possible?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 152-154
  • 16 Rauh S M, Coller J A, Schoetz D J. Fluoroscopy in colonoscopy: Who is using it and why?.  Am J Surg. 1989;  55 569-574
  • 17 Larach S W, Salomon M C, Williamson P R, Goldstein E. Laparoscopic assisted colectomy: Experience during the learning curve.  Coloproctology. 1993;  1 38-41
  • 18 Whalen J, Riemenschnieder P. An analysis of the normal anatomic relationships of the colon applied to roentgenographic observations.  Am J Roentgenol Radiat Ther Nucl Med. 1967;  99 55-61
  • 19 Kim S H, Milsom J W, Church J M. et al . Perioperative tumour localisation for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.  Surg Endosc. 1997;  11 1013-1016
  • 20 Ellis K K, Fennerty M B. Marking and identifying colon lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997;  7 401-411

B. P. Saunders, M.D.

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy · St. Mark’s Hospital

Watford Road · Harrow HA1 3UJ · United Kingdom

Fax: + 44-208-423-3588

Email: b.saunders@ic.ac.uk

    >