Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2003; 128(2): 106-110
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37763
Originalarbeiten und Übersichten

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Untersuchungen zur Komplikationsrate nach thorakoskopischer und konventioneller Lobektomie

Thorakoskopie beim BronchialkarzinomComplication Rate After Thoracoscopic and Conventional LobectomyBeatrix Hoksch1 , B. Ablaßmaier1 , M. Walter1 , J. M. Müller1
  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Charité Campus Mitte, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 March 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Unterschiede hinsichtlich postoperativer Komplikationen nach thorakoskopischer Lobektomie im Vergleich zur konventionellen Operationsmethode (Thorakotomie) bei Patienten mit einem primären nicht-kleinzelligen Bronchialkarzinom sollen analysiert werden.

Methodik: 42 Patienten mit dem Verdacht auf ein primäres Bronchialkarzinom (Stadium T1 oder T2) wurden einer thorakoskopischen Lobektomie (n=28) oder konventionellen Lobektomie (n=14) zugeführt und prospektiv hinsichtlich der Komplikationen im unmittelbaren postoperativen Verlauf (30 Tage) untersucht. Beide Gruppen unterschieden sich nicht hinsichtlich Alter, Co-Morbidität, Tumorlokalisation und Tumorstadium.

Ergebnisse: Die Patienten mit einer konventionellen Lobektomie hatten eine signifikant höhere postoperative Komplikationsrate im Vergleich zum thorakoskopischen Operationsverfahren (50 % vs. 14,2 %, p=0,03).

Schlussfolgerung: Die thorakoskopische Lobektomie kann für den Patienten eine alternative, komplikationsärmere Operationsmethode darstellen.

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether a thoracoscopic lobectomy used for treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer shows a higher or lower morbidity in comparison to the conventional resection (thoracotomy) postoperatively.

Methodology: 42 patients with the presumption diagnosis of a lung cancer reveived a thoracoscopic lobectomy (n=28) or a conventional lobectomy (n=14). Postoperative complication rate (30 days) was analysed prospectively. There were no differences between the groups referring to age, co-morbidity, localisation of the tumor and stage.

Results: Patients with a conventional operation revealed a significant higher morbidity in comparison to the patients of the thoracoscopic group (50 % vs. 14.2 %, p=0.03).

Conclusion: The thoracoscopic lobectomy represents a safe operation method and an alternative to the conventional operation (thoracotomy).

Schlüsselwörter

Thorakoskopie - Bronchialkarzinom - Morbidität

Key words

Thoracoscopy - lung cancer - morbidity

Literatur

  • 1 Asamura H, Nakayama H, Kondo H, Tsuchiya R, Shimosato Y, Naruke T. Lymph Node involvement, recurrence and prognosis in resected small, peripheral, non-small-cell lung carcinomas: are these carcinomas candidates for video-assisted lobectomy?.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;  111 1125-1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bhatnagar N K, Berndt S. A solution to prolonged air leak after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  59 260-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ciriaco P, Mazzone P, Canneto B, Zannini P. Supraventricular arrhythmia following lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer and its treatment with amiodarone.  Euro J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2000;  18 12-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dieter R A, Kuzycz G B. Complications and contraindications of thoracoscopy.  Int Surg. 1997;  82 232-239
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Downey R J. Complications after video-assisted thoracic surgery.  Chest Surg Clin North Am. 1998;  8 907-917
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Eckersberger F. Leitlinien zur Minimal-Invasiven Chirurgie in der onkologischen Thoraxchirurgie. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II (Kongressbericht) 1997; 246 - 250
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Giudicelli R, Thomas P, Lonjon T, Ragni J, Morati N. et al . Video-assisted minithoracotomy versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for performing lobectomy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;  58 712-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hazelrigg S t. R. for the video assisted thoracic surgery study group data.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;  56 1039-1044
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hoksch B, Ablaßmaier B, Walter M, M üller J M. Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy with lymphadenectomy in a cadaver model.  Acta Chirurgica Austriaca - European Surgery. 2000;  32 82-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hoksch B, Ablaßmaier B, Walter M, Müller J M. The thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy in a cadaver model. Canad J Surg 2002 April: in press
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Jiménez M F. Prospective study on video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the resection of pulmonary nodules: 209 cases from the Spanish video-assisted thoracic surgery group.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;  19 562-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kaiser L R, Bavaria J E. Complications of thoracoscopy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;  56 796-798
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kirby T J, Mack M J, Landreneau R J, Rice T W. Initial experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;  56 1248-1253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Krasna M J. Complications of thoracoscopy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  61 1066-1069
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lewis R J. Simultaneously stapled lobectomy: A safe technique for video-assisted thoracic surgery.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;  109 619-625
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lewis R J, Caccavale R J, Sisler G E, Bocage J P. Does VATS favor seeding of carcinoma of the lung more than a conventional operation?.  Int Surg. 1997;  82 127-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mack M J, Scruggs G R, Kelly K H, Shennib H, Landreneau R J. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: Has technology found its place?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 211-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 McKenna R. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;  107 879-882
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 McKenna R J, Wolf R K, Brenner M, Fischel R J, Wurnig P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 1903-1908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Neustein S M, Kahn P, Krellenstein D J, Cohen E. Incidence of arrhythmias after thoracic surgery: thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracoscopy.  J Cardiothoracic Vascular Anesthesia. 1998;  12 659-661
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Poulin E C, Labbé R. Fully thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy and specimen extraction through rib segment resection.  Surgical Endoscopy. 1997;  11 354-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rossi L, Litwin D E, Gowda K. Anatomic thoracoscopic lobectomy (ATL) without minithoracotomy: preliminary experience.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;  6 49-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Roviario G, Varoli F, Rebuffat C, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scalambra S M, Sonnino D, Gozi G. Videothoracoscopic staging and treatment of lung cancer.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  59 971-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Santillan-Doherty P, Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Argote-Greene L M, Hernández-Calleros J. Nonanatomic thoracoscopic wedge resection for diffuse lung disease and indeterminate pulmonary nodule.  World J Surg. 2001;  26 43-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Schirren J, Trainer S, Schneider P, Hendricks H, Mü ller K M, Vogt-Moykopf I. Sind videoassistierte thorakoskopische Resektionsverfahren in der onkologischen Chirurgie vertretbar?.  Chirurg. 1994;  65 664-670
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schwieger I, Gamulin Z, Suter P M. Lung function during anesthesia and respiratory insufficiency in the postoperative period: physiological and clinical implications.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989;  33 527-534
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sonett J R. VATS and thoracic oncology: Anathema or opportunity.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 795-796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Stamatis G, Fechner S. Die videothorakoskopische Lobektomie.  Chirurg. 1996;  67 425-435
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stammberger U, Steinacher C, Hillinger S, Schmid R A, Kinsberger T, Weder W. Early and long-term complaints following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: Evaluation in 173 patients.  Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2000;  18 7-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Stoelben E, Wehrmann U, Ockert D, Saeger H D. VATS: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen chirurgischer Therapie maligner Lungenerkrankungen.  Zentralbl Chir. 1998;  123 1129-1133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Nawaia K, Fujita N, Ueda K, Nawata S, Esaio K. Cost analysis for thoracoscopy: Thoracoscopic wedge resection and lobectomy.  Surgery Today. 1998;  28 41-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Tschernko E M, Hofer S, Bieglmayr C, Wisser W, Haider W. Early postoperative stress: Video-assisted wedge resection/lobectomy vs conventional axillary thoracotomy.  Chest. 1996;  109 1636-1642
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Walker W S, Carnochan F M, Pugh G C. Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy: Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;  106 111-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Walker W S, Carnochan F M, Tin M. Thoracoscopic assisted pulmonary lobectomy.  Thorax. 1993;  48 921-924
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Walker W S, Pugh G C, Craig S R, Carnochan F M. Continued experience with thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection.  Int Surg. 1996;  81 255-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Waller D A, Forty J, Morritt G N. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for spontaneous pneumothorax.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;  58 327-376
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Yim A PC, Liu H P. Complications and failures of video-assisted thoracic surgery: Experiences from two centers in Asia.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  61 538-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. Beatrix Hoksch

Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie · Charité Campus Mitte · Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Schumannstr. 20/21

10117 Berlin

Phone: 0 30/4 50 52 21 08

Email: hoksch@t-online.de

      >