Safety and Success of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery in Patients with Preeclampsia

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine if preeclampsia (PRE) or gestational hypertension (GH) affects the rate of success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC), VBAC-related complications, or patient election to attempt VBAC. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all women who were offered VBAC from 1996 to 2000 in 17 community and university hospitals. Demographic, medical, and obstetric history, complications, treatment, and index pregnancy outcome information was collected on all patients in the database. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the independent association between GH and PRE and the rate of success of VBAC, VBAC-related complications, or patient election to attempt VBAC. A total of 25,005 patients were registered in the database. 13,706 (54.81%) attempted VBAC and 11,299 (45.19%) elected repeat cesarean delivery. After adjusting for confounding variables using multivariable logistic regression, patients with PRE were more likely to fail VBAC (relative risk [RR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.00). Patients with GH were less likely to attempt VBAC (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.46). A total of 304 (1.46%) patients had a uterine rupture. The VBAC group had a rupture rate of 0.93% and the elective cesarean group had a rupture rate of 0.04%. There was no difference in uterine rupture rates between the cohorts. Patients with gestational hypertension were less likely to attempt a VBAC. Patients with PRE, if they attempted a VBAC trial, had a higher VBAC failure rate. Patients with PRE or GH do not have increased uterine rupture rates. These findings can be used to improve mode of delivery counseling for VBAC candidate patients with preeclampsia.

KEYWORDS

Preeclampsia - vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) - pregnancy outcomes

REFERENCES

• 1 Martin J, Hamilton B E, Sutton P D, Ventura S J, Menacker F, Munson M L. Births: final data for 2000.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2002;  52 1-13
• 2 McMahon M, Luther E R, Bowes Jr. W A, Olshan A F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second ceserean section.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 689-695
• 3 ACOG Practice Bulletin . Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery.  Number 2, October 1998;  Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician Gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists  1-7
• 4 Sibai B M, Ewell M, Levine R J et al.. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  177 1003-1010
• 5 Carroll C S, Magann E F, Chauhan S P, Klauser C K, Morrison J C et al.. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 1516-1522
• 6 Brill Y, Windrim R. Vaginal birth after Cesarean section: review of antenatal predictors of success.  J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;  25 275-286
• 7 Bedoya C, Bartha J L, Rodriguez I et al.. A trial of labor after cesarean section in patients with or without a prior vaginal delivery.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1992;  39 285-289
• 8 Elkousy M A, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert J F, Macones G et al.. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 824-830
• 9 Pickhardt M, Martin Jr. J N, Meydrech E F et al.. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: are the useful and valid predictors of success or failure?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  166 1811-1819
• 10 Troyer L, Parisi V. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  167 1099-1104
• 11 Farmer R M, Kirschbaum T, Potter D, Strong T H, Medearis A L. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  165 996-1001
• 12 Jones R O, Nagashima A W, Hartnett-Goodman M M, Goodlin R C. Rupture of low transverse cesarean scars during trial of labor.  Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  77 815-817
• 13 Scott J R. Avoiding labor problems during vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  40 533-541
• 14 ACOG Practice Bulletin . Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;  77 67-75
• 15 Saftlas A F, Olson D R, Franks A L, Arash H K, Pokras R. Epidemiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia in the United States, 1979-1986.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;  163 460-465
• 16 Landon M B et al.. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.  Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;  60 291-293