Glaucoma Treatment in German Hospitals in 2019

Abstract

Background Surgical procedures in ophthalmology are subject to fluctuations in their application and are dependent on new developments, availability, and success rates. In the field of glaucoma surgery in particular, numerous new procedures have been introduced over the last few years. So far, hardly any analyses have been done on the current application of these newer procedures. In this paper, we present the extent to which different glaucoma surgery procedures were used in German hospitals in 2019.

Methods The quality reports of German hospitals from 2019 were evaluated regarding all glaucoma-specific procedure codes. In particular, laser procedures, “classic” glaucoma procedures, and “modern” procedures such as MIGS (minimally invasive glaucoma surgery) are compared below.

Results In 2019, 49,031 glaucoma procedures were performed in German hospitals. Numerically, cyclodestructive procedures were used most frequently. MIGS accounted for approximately 10% of procedures according to the available data. Among filtering procedures, about 40% were implant-assisted.

Discussion and Conclusion On the one hand, the data analyzed show a mixed expansion of the spectrum with newer procedures such as the MIGS and implants; on the other hand, classic procedures such as cyclodestruction are still used. It can be assumed that further shifts in surgical methods will be seen in the coming years.

Key words

glaucoma surgery - MIGS - trabeculectomy - laser trabeculoplasty

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 02. November 2021

Angenommen: 17. Dezember 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. März 2022

• References/Literatur

• 1 Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR. et al. Glaucoma. Lancet 2017; 390: 2183-2193
• 2 Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 262-267
• 3 Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY. et al. Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2081-2090
• 4 Gordon MO, Kass MA. What We Have Learned From the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 189: xxiv-xxvii
• 5 Quigley HA. 21st century glaucoma care. Eye (Lond) 2019; 33: 254-260
• 6 Higginbotham EJ, Alexis D. Is Newer Necessarily Better? The Evolution of Incisional Glaucoma Surgery Over the Last 100 Years. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 191: xxv-xxix
• 7 Chang TC, Vanner EA, Parrish RK. Glaucoma surgery preferences when the surgeon adopts the role of the patient. Eye (Lond) 2019; 33: 1577-1583
• 8 Vinod K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ. et al. Practice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J Glaucoma 2017; 26: 687-693
• 9 Kerr NM, Kumar HK, Crowston JG. et al. Glaucoma laser and surgical procedure rates in Australia. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1686-1691
• 10 Bron AM, Mariet AS, Benzenine E. et al. Trends in operating room-based glaucoma procedures in France from 2005 to 2014: a nationwide study. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 1500-1504
• 11 Barbosa-Breda J, Gonçalves-Pinho M, Santos JV. et al. Trends in Glaucoma Surgical Procedures in Portugal: A 16-Year Nationwide Study (2000–2015). J Glaucoma 2018; 27: 682-686
• 12 Murphy C, Ogston S, Cobb C. et al. Recent trends in glaucoma surgery in Scotland, England and Wales. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 99: 308-312
• 13 Luebke J, Boehringer D, Anton A. et al. Trends in Surgical Glaucoma Treatment in Germany Between 2006 and 2018. Clin Epidemiol 2021; 13: 581-592
• 14 Daniel MC, Böhringer D, Reinhard T. et al. [The Role of Hospitals in the Treatment of Patients with Cataract in Germany: Systematic Analysis of the Quality Reports of German Hospitals for the Years 2006 to 2016]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2019; 236: 964-968
• 15 Daniel MC, Böhringer D, Lapp T. et al. [Keratoplasty in Germany: Systematic Analysis of the Quality Reports of German Hospitals between 2006 and 2017]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238: 288-292
• 16 Lang SJ, Wenzel M, Böhringer D. et al. [Systematic analysis of the annual quality reports of the Federal Joint Committee with regard to cataract surgery]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2014; 231: 1115-1119
• 17 Bucher F, Daniel MC, Böhringer D. et al. [Scleral Buckling Surgery in Germany for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Spirit of the Past or Current Practice?]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2020; 237: 780-786
• 18 Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Regelungen des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses gemäß § 136b Absatz 1 Satz 1 Nummer 3 SGB V über Inhalt, Umfang und Datenformat eines strukturierten Qualitätsberichts für nach § 108 SGB V zugelassene Krankenhäuser. Im Internet (Stand: 01.09.2021): https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-2614/Qb-R_2021-06-17_iK-2021-09-10.pdf
• 19 R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2021 Im Internet): https://www.R-project.org/
• 20 Bloom P, Au L. “Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) Is a Poor Substitute for Trabeculectomy”–The Great Debate. Ophthalmol Ther 2018; 7: 203-210
• 21 Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D. et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 393: 1505-1516
• 22 Garg A, Vickerstaff V, Nathwani N. et al. Efficacy of Repeat Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Medication-Naive Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension during the LiGHT Trial. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 467-476
• 23 Lenzhofer M, Kersten-Gomez I, Sheybani A. et al. Four-year results of a minimally invasive transscleral glaucoma gel stent implantation in a prospective multicenter study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 47: 581-587