Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett 2022; 33(06): 585-588
DOI: 10.1055/a-1750-8481
DOI: 10.1055/a-1750-8481
letter
Thorpe–Ingold Effect on High-Performance Chiral π–Copper(II) Catalyst
This work was supported by funds from the NOVARTIS Foundation (Japan) for the Promotion of Science (to K.I.), and from the Nagoya University Graduate Program of Transformative Chem-Bio Research (GTR, to K.N.).

Abstract
The Thorpe–Ingold effect was applied to the design of a chiral ligand of π–copper(II) catalysts for the enantioselective α-fluorination of N-acyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazoles, and also for the enantioselective Mukaiyama–Michael, Diels–Alder, and 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions of N-acryloyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazoles. The use of β,β-dimethyl-β-arylalanine-type ligand gave desired products with higher enantioselectivity compared to with previously reported β-arylalanine-type ligands.
Key words
π–copper(II) catalyst - chiral catalyst - Lewis acid - enantioselective - Diels–Alder reaction - Mukaiyama–Michael reaction - 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition - α-fluorinationSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1750-8481.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 18 December 2021
Accepted after revision: 25 January 2022
Accepted Manuscript online:
26 January 2022
Article published online:
21 February 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Ishihara K, Fushimi M. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 1921
- 1b Ishihara K, Fushimi M, Akakura M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007; 40: 1049
- 1c Ishihara K, Fushimi M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 7532
- 1d Sakakura A, Hori M, Fushimi M, Ishihara K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 15550
- 1e Sakakura A, Ishihara K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011; 40: 163
- 1f Hori M, Sakakura A, Ishihara K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 13198
- 2 Yao L, Ishihara K. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 2259
- 3a Ishihara K, Nishimura K, Yamakawa K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 17641
- 3b Nishimura K, Wang Y, Ogura Y, Kumagai J, Ishihara K. ACS Catal. 2022; 12: 1012
- 4a Beesley RM, Ingold CK, Thorpe JF. J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 1915; 107: 1080
- 4b Jung ME, Piizzi G. Chem. Rev. 2005; 105: 1735
- 4c Bachrach SM. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 2466
- 5a Corey EJ, Loh T.-P, Roper TD, Azimioara MD, Noe MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 8290
- 5b Ishihara K, Gao Q, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993; 115: 10412
- 5c Chen H, Wang L, Wang F, Zhao L.-P, Tang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 6941
- 6 Procedure for the Enantioselective Diels–Alder Reaction of 2 with Isoprene Using Cu(NTf2)2·(R)-1e To a mixture of (R)-1e (11.2 mg, 0.033 mmol) and Cu(NTf2)2 (18.7 mg, 0.030 mmol) in a heat-gun-dried 20 mL Schlenk flask in MeCN (2.4 mL, dried over activated 4 Å molecular sieves) was added 2 (66.7 mg, 0.30 mmol) and stirred for 5 min. To the mixture was added isoprene (600 μL, 6.0 mmol) at 23 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at 23 °C for 72 h. The reaction was quenched with a few drops of triethylamine. The product was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution, extracted with EtOAc, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by chromatography on neutral silica gel (hexane–EtOAc) afforded the desired product 4 (78.5 mg, 90% yield, regioisomeric ratio (4a/4b) = 96:4, >99% ee/97% ee). Regioisomeric ratio was determined by crude NMR. The ee value was determined by HPLC analysis. Ethyl (1S,6S)-6-(3,5-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazole-1-carbonyl)-3-methylcyclohex-3-ene-1-carboxylate (4a) 1a 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.95 (s, 1 H), 5.47–5.38 (m, 1 H), 4.21–3.99 (m, 3 H), 3.07 (dt, J = 11.4, 5.7 Hz, 2 H), 2.68–2.57 (m, 1 H), 2.51 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3 H), 2.42–2.33 (m, 1 H), 2.25–2.03 (m, 2 H), 2.23 (s, 3 H), 1.71 (s, 3 H), 1.18 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.23 (s, 3 H), 3.08 (quint, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.6, 175.0, 152.1, 144.1, 132.3, 119.5, 111.3, 60.7, 42.0, 40.9, 32.9, 29.3, 23.1, 14.7, 14.2, 14.0. HPLC analysis: ID-3, n-hexane/i-PrOH = 99:1, 1.0 mL/min, t R = 11.2 min (major, 4b), t R = 13.5 min (major, 4a), t R = 14.8 min (minor, 4a), t R = 20.2 min (minor, 4b).
- 7a Cai X, Keshavarz A, Omaque JD, Stokes BJ. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 2626
- 7b Jørgensen M, Lee S, Liu X, Wolkowski JP, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 12557
- 8 For the experimental procedures for preparation of (R)-1e, see ref. 3.
- 9 Li B.-F, Yuan K, Zhang M.-J, Wu H, Dai L.-X, Wang QR, Hou X.-L. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 6264
For representative examples of Thorpe–Ingold effects of the ligand on enantioselectivity, see: