Synlett 2023; 34(11): 1235-1240
DOI: 10.1055/a-2030-7082
letter

Preparation of New Chiral Building Blocks by a Mukaiyama–Michael Reaction of 2-(Phenylsulfonyl)cyclopent-2-en-1-one

Ryoji Sugiyama
,
Masahisa Nakada
This work was financially supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grants Numbers JP19H02725 and JP22H02087, the Nagase Science and Technology Foundation, and a Waseda University Grant for Special Research Projects.


Abstract

A highly enantio- and diastereoselective Mukaiyama–­Michael reaction of 2-(phenylsulfonyl)cyclopent-2-en-1-one by using an enol silane of tert-butyl thiopropionate is described. The product was formed in 87% yield with a dr of 27:1 and 91% ee under stoichiometric conditions, whereas the yield, dr, and ee were 89%, 49:1, and 88% ee, respectively, under catalytic conditions. A highly stereoselective epimerization of the product of the Mukaiyama–Michael reaction which proceeds in 77% yield with a dr of 22:1 is also described. Because both enantiomers of the ligand for this Mukaiyama–Michael reaction are available, a method for the synthesis of all four stereoisomers of the product as useful chiral building blocks has been established.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 13 December 2022

Accepted after revision: 08 February 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 February 2023

Article published online:
02 March 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Sassa T, Tojyo T, Munakata K. Nature 1970; 227: 379

    • For the first enantioselective total synthesis, see:
    • 1b Uwamori M, Osada R, Sugiyama R, Nagatani K, Nakada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 5556
  • 2 Ohnuma N, Bannai K, Yamaguchi H, Hashimoto Y, Norman AW. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1980; 204: 387
    • 3a Doskotch RW, Hufford CD. J. Pharm. Sci. 1969; 58: 186
    • 3b Lee K, Huang E, Plantadosl C, Pagano JS, Geissman TA. Cancer Res. 1971; 31: 1649

    • For total syntheses of damsin, see:
    • 3c Kretchmer RA, Thompson WJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976; 98: 3379
    • 3d Quallich GJ, Schlessinger RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979; 101: 7627
    • 3e Grieco PA, Majetich GF, Ohfune Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982; 104: 4226
    • 3f Money T, Wong MK. C. Tetrahedron 1996; 52: 6307
  • 4 Bujnicki T, Wilczek C, Schomburg C, Feldmann F, Schlenke P, Müller-Tidow C, Schmidt TJ, Klempnauer K.-H. Leukemia 2012; 26: 615
    • 5a Parker BA, Geissman TA. J. Org. Chem. 1962; 27: 4127
    • 5b Ovezdurdyev A, Abdullaev ND, Kasymov SZ, Akyev B. Chem. Nat. Compd. 1986; 22: 532
  • 6 Wang Q, Zhou B.-N, Zhang R.-W, Lin Y.-Y, Lin L.-Z, Gil RR, Cordell GA. Planta Med. 1996; 62: 166
  • 7 For the first Michael reaction of 2-(tolylsulfonyl)cyclopent-2-en-1-one, see: Posner GH, Switzer C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986; 108: 1239
    • 8a Reyes E, Uria U, Vicario JL, Carrillo L. Org. React. (Hoboken, NJ U. S.) 2016; 90: 1

    • For the catalytic asymmetric Mukaiyama–Michael reactions of alkylidene malonates, see:
    • 8b Evans DA, Rovis T, Kozlowski MC, Tedrow JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 1994
    • 8c Evans DA, Rovis T, Kozlowski MC, Downey CW, Tedrow JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 9134

    • For the catalytic asymmetric vinylogous Mukaiyama–Michael reactions of alkylidene malonates, see:
    • 8d Zhang Q, Xiao X, Lin L, Liu X, Feng X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011; 9: 5748
    • 8e Jusseau X, Retailleau P, Chabaud L, Guillou C. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 2289
    • 8f Fraile JM, García N, Herrerías CI. ACS Catal. 2013; 3: 2710
    • 9a Bernardi A, Karamfilova K, Boschin G, Scolastico C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995; 36: 1363
    • 9b Bernardi A, Colombo G, Scolastico C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996; 37: 8921
    • 9c Bernardi A, Karamfilova K, Sanguinetti S, Scolastico C. Tetrahedron 1997; 53: 13009
  • 10 Oyama H, Orimoto K, Niwa T, Nakada M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2015; 26: 262
  • 11 Nagatani K, Minami A, Tezuka H, Hoshino Y, Nakada M. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 810
  • 12 Yechezkel T, Ghera E, Ostercamp D, Hassner A. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 5135
  • 13 Trimitsis G, Beers S, Ridella J, Carlon M, Cullin D, High J, Brutts D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984; 1088
  • 14 The reaction of 5 and 6 (1.5 equiv) was performed under the optimized conditions shown in Table 3 by using Cu(OTf)2 (20 mol%) and L3 (25 mol%) in the presence of 3 Å MS (300 wt%) in 2:1 toluene–DCM (2:1) at –40 °C. However, 7 was obtained in only 17% yield (dr 7.4:1, 74% ee) after 40 h.
  • 15 Sawada T, Nakada M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2012; 23: 350
  • 16 The reaction of 2-(2,4,6-trimethylphenylsulfonyl)cyclopent-2-en-1-one and 8f (1.5 equiv) was examined by using Cu(OTf)2 (100 mol%), ligand L3 (110 mol%), and 3 Å MS in 2:1 toluene–DCM at –60 °C. The product was obtained in 95% yield with a dr of 42:1; however, the enantioselectivity was decreased (53% ee).
  • 17 Compound 9f A mixture of Cu(OTf)2 (4.5 mg, 0.0124 mmol), L3 (6.5 mg, 0.0155 mmol), and 3 Å MS (38.7 mg) in 2:1 toluene–DCM (0.290 mL) was stirred at rt for 1.5 h. A solution of 5 (13.2 mg, 0.0594 mmol) in 2:1 toluene–DCM (0.600 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at rt for 1.5 h. A solution of 8f (17.7 mg, 0.0810 mmol) in 2:1 toluene–DCM (0.300 mL) was added at –60 °C, and the mixture was stirred at –60 °C for 41.5 h. The reaction was quenched with sat. aq NaHCO3 (2.0 mL) and the mixture was filtered. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 5 mL), and the combined organic layer was washed with H2O (5 mL) and brine (5 mL) then dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (6:1)] to afford 9f containing inseparable L3 as a white solid; yield: 26.0 mg [0.0531 mmol, 89% (calcd based on 1H NMR)]; Rf = 0.70 (hexane–EtOAc, 2:3). [α]D 21 –55 (c 0.65, DCM). IR (ATR): 1747, 1666, 1310, 1151, 1084, 1063, 970, 755, 729, 686, 621, 586, 555, 533, 494 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.86 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.70 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.58 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.83 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (ddd, J = 8.0, 5.5, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.90 (ddd, J = 7.5, 7.0 , 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.48–2.38 (m, 1 H), 2.36–2.25 (m, 1 H), 1.88–1.79 (m, 1 H), 1.43 (s, 9 H), 1.18 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 206.4, 202.8, 137.8, 134.3, 129.2, 71.8, 50.5, 48.6, 40.5, 37.7, 29.7, 23.6, 14.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H24NaO4S2: 391.1014; found: 391.1007.
  • 18 CCDC 2235289 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 9f′. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
  • 19 Sugiyama R, Nakada M. Synlett 2023; in press DOI: 10.1055/a-2017-3636.
  • 20 De Clercq P, Vandewalle M. J. Org. Chem. 1977; 42: 3447