Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20(2): 133-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1237355
Case Gallery

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Fluid Creep in Major Pediatric Burns

A. D. Rogers 1 , J. Karpelowsky 1 , A. J. W Millar 1 , A. Argent 2 , H. Rode 1
  • 1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
  • 2Department of Paediatric Critical Care, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 October 2009 (online)

Introduction

Adequate fluid resuscitation is a critical component in the management of major burns. The early restoration of intravascular volume and the maintenance of tissue perfusion has almost eliminated post burn renal failure and significantly reduced mortality [1] [2] [3].

The Parkland formula estimates a 24-hour fluid volume for resuscitation of 4 milliliters per kilogram body mass (ml/kg) per percentage total body surface area (TBSA) burn for the first 24 h. Half of the calculated volume is administered in the first 8 h after the burn has been sustained and the balance during the subsequent 16 h [4]. Baxter published his experience with his formula after a ten-year period of use, concluding that it is an accurate guide for 70% of patients, with 12% requiring more fluid and 18% requiring less fluid [5]. The systemic ‘capillary leak’ that causes the shift of fluid usually ‘seals off’ after 24 h if resuscitation has been adequate. Fluid volume infusions are therefore reduced to 1.5 ml/kg/% burn during the second 24 h. These guidelines are effective, provided that the clinical response is monitored and the fluid therapy modified accordingly [6].

In recent years there has been a tendency to increase the volume of total resuscitation administered and a recent review of 28 burn centers revealed that 58% of patients received more than the 4 ml/kg/% burn recommended by Baxter and Shires [7]. Other publications have demonstrated that up to 73% of patients now receive volumes between 4 and 8 ml/kg/% burn [8].

The Advanced Paediatric Life Support (APLS) Course Manual (4th edition, 2005) maintains that the Parkland formula “is only a guide; subsequent therapy will be guided by urine output, which should be kept at 2 ml/kg/hour or more” [9]. The pendulum has therefore swung from inadequate resuscitation to excessive volume replacement [1]. The consequences are encapsulated in the term ‘fluid creep’, coined by Pruitt in 2000 [10].

Over-resuscitation can result in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MODS), abdominal and limb compartment syndromes and cerebral edema. Clinicians, it appears, are chasing urine outputs well in excess of those required [11] [12] [13].

References

  • 1 Hansen S. Feature: From cholera to “fluid creep”: A historical review of fluid resuscitation of the burn trauma patient.  Wounds. 2008;  20 206-213
  • 2 Underhill FP, Carrington GL, Kapsinov R. et al . Blood concentration changes in extensive superficial burns and their significance for systemic treatment.  Arch Int Med. 1923;  32 321-349
  • 3 Cope O, Moore FD. The redistribution of body water and the fluid therapy of the burned patient.  Ann Surg. 1947;  126 1010-1045
  • 4 Baxter CR, Shires T. Physiological response to crystalloid resuscitation of severe burns.  Ann NY Acad Sci. 1968;  150 874-894
  • 5 Baxter C. Fluid resuscitation, burn percentage and physiologic age.  J Trauma. 1979;  19 864-865
  • 6 Csontos C, Foldi V, Fischer T. et al . Factors affecting fluid requirement on the first day after severe burn trauma.  ANZ J Surg. 2007;  77 745-748
  • 7 Engrav LH, Colescott PL, Kemalyan N. A biopsy of the use of the Baxter formula to resuscitate burns or do we do it like Charlie did it?.  J Burn Care Res. 2000;  21 91-95
  • 8 Friedrich JB, Sullivan SR, Engrav LH. et al . Is Supra-Baxter resuscitation in burn patients a new phenomenon?.  Burns. 2004;  30 464-466
  • 9 Mackay-Jones K, Molyneux E, Phillips B,, Wieteska S. (Eds) . The burned or scalded child.  Advanced Paediatric Life Support – The Practical Approach. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Advanced Life Support Group BMJ Books ISBN 0-7279-1847-8. 2005;  4 203
  • 10 Pruitt BA. Protection from excessive resuscitation: “Pushing the pendulum back”.  J Trauma. 2000;  49 567-568
  • 11 Saffle JI. The phenomenon of “fluid creep” in acute burn resuscitation.  J Burn Care Res. 2007;  28 382-395
  • 12 Klein MB, Hayden D, Elson C. et al . The association between fluid administration and outcome following major burn.  Ann Surg. 2007;  245 622-628
  • 13 Hartford CE. Invited critique: fluid creep.  J Burn Care Res. 2007;  28 770-772
  • 14 Serour F, Stein M, Gorenstein A. et al . Early burn related gram positive systemic infection in children admitted to a paediatric surgical ward.  Burns. 2006;  32 352-356
  • 15 Karpelowsky JS, Wallis L, Madaree A. et al . South African burn stabilisation protocol.  S Afr Med J. 2007;  97 574-577
  • 16 Blumetti J, Hunt JL, Arnoldo BD. et al . The Parkland formula under fire: Is the criticism justified?.  J Burn Care Res. 2008;  28 180-186
  • 17 Arlati S, Storti E, Pradella V. et al . Decreased fluid volume to reduce organ damage: a new approach to burn shock resuscitation? A preliminary study.  Resuscitation. 2007;  72 371-378
  • 18 Kamolz LP, Andel H, Schramm W. Lactate: early predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with severe burns.  Burns. 2005;  31 986-990
  • 19 Cancio LC, Galvez E, Turner CE. Base deficit and alveolar-arterial gradient during resuscitation contribute independently but modestly to the prediction of mortality after burn injury.  J Burn Care Res. 2006;  27 289-296
  • 20 Holm C, Mayr M, Tegeler J. A clinical randomized study of the effects of invasive monitoring on burn shock resuscitation.  Burns. 2004;  30 798-807
  • 21 Bunn F, Roberts IG, Tasker R. et al . Hypertonic versus near isotonic crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.  The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004;  3 Art. No: CD002045. DOI: 10.1002/146151858.CD002045.pub2 
  • 22 The Albumin Reviewers (Alderson P, Bunn F, Li Wan Po A, Li L, Pearson M, Roberts I, Schierhout G) . Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients.  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004;  Issue 4. Art. No: CD001208. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD001208.pub2 
  • 23 Peel P, Roberts IG. Colloids versus Crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients (Review).  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;  Issue 4. Art No.: CD000567. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub3 
  • 24 Baxter C. Fluid volumes and electrolyte changes of the early postburn period.  Clin Plast Surg. 1974;  1 693-703
  • 25 Holm C. Resuscitation in shock associated with burns.  Tradition or evidence based medicine? Resuscitation. 2000;  44 157-164
  • 26 Cartotto R, Innes M, Musgrave M. et al . How well does the Parkland formula estimate actual fluid resuscitation volumes?.  J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002;  23 258-265
  • 27 Quinlan GJ, Margarsan MP, Mumby S. Administration of albumin to patients with sepsis syndrome: a possible beneficial role in plasma thiol repletion.  Clin Sci. 1998;  95 459-465
  • 28 Quinlan GJ, Mumby S, Martin GS. et al . Albumin influences total plasma antioxidant capacity favourably in patients with acute lung injury.  Crit Care Med. 2004;  32 755-759
  • 29 Boldt J, Papsdorf M. Fluid management in burn patients: Results from a European study – more questions than answers.  Burns. 2008;  34 328-338
  • 30 Jain R, Chakravorty N, Chakravorty D. et al . Albumin: An overview of its place in current clinical practice.  Indian J Anaesth. 2004;  48 433-438
  • 31 Liolios A. Volume resuscitation: The crystalloid vs. colloid debate revisited.  Medscape Crit Care. 2004;  http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/480288
  • 32 Evans T. Biochemical properties of albumin.  Program and abstracts of the 24th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. 2004; 
  • 33 Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ. Patient survival after human albumin administration. A meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials.  Ann Intern Med. 2001;  135 149-164
  • 34 The SAFE study investigators . A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit.  N Eng J Med. 2004;  350 2247-2256
  • 35 Zhang H, Voglis S, Kim CH. Effects of albumin and Ringer's lactate on production of lung cytokines and hydrogen peroxide after resuscitated haemorrhage and endotoxaemia in rats.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 1515-1522
  • 36 Martin GS. Fluid balance and colloid osmotic pressure in acute respiratory failure: emerging clinical evidence.  Crit Care. 2000;  4 S21-25
  • 37 Vincent J, Dubois M, Navickis R. et al . Hypoalbuminaemia in acute illness: Is there a rationale for intervention.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 319-334
  • 38 Kaminski M, Williams S. Review of the rapid normalization of serum albumin with modified total parenteral nutrition solution.  Crit Care Med. 1990;  18 327-335
  • 39 Margarson M, Soni N. Serum albumin: touchstone or totem?.  Anaesthesia. 1998;  53 789-803
  • 40 Guthrie R, Hines C. Use of intravenous albumin in the critically ill patient.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 255-263
  • 41 Bolam V Fiern, Barnet HMC . 1957;  2 A11 ER;-118
  • 42 Fogarty B, Khan K. Letter to the Editor. Multicentre randomised trial is needed before changing resuscitation formulas for major burns.  BMJ. 1999;  318 1214
  • 43 Sanchez R. Role of albumin in burnt patients: Its efficacy during intensive care.  Ann Fr Anaesth Reanim. 1996;  15 1124-1129
  • 44 Sullivan SR, Friedrich JB, Engrav LH. et al . Opioid creep. is real and may be the cause of “fluid creep”.  Burns. 2004;  30 583-590
  • 45 Burd A, Noronha FV, Ahmed K. et al . Decompression not escharotomy in acute burns.  Burns. 2006;  32 284-292
  • 46 O’Mara MS, Slater H, Goldfarb I. et al . A prospective, randomized evaluation of intra-abdominal pressures with crystalloid and colloid resuscitation in burn patients.  J Trauma. 2005;  58 1011-1018
  • 47 Parra MW, Al-Khayat H, Smith HG. et al . Paracentesis for resuscitation-induced abdominal compartment syndrome: An alternative to decompressive laparotomy in the burn patient.  J Trauma. 2006;  60 1119-1121
  • 48 Hobson KG, Young KM, Ciraulo A. et al . Release of abdominal compartment syndrome improves survival in patients with burn injury.  J Trauma. 2002;  53 1129-1134
  • 49 Tsoutsos D, Rodopoulou S, Keramidas E. et al . Early escharotomy as a measure to reduce intra-abdominal hypertension in full-thickness burns of the thoracic and abdominal area.  World J Surg.. 2003;  27 1323-1328
  • 50 Ivy ME, Atweh NA, Palmer JP. et al . Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in burn patients.  J Trauma. 2000;  49 387-391
  • 51 Cheathan ML, Malbrain ML, Kirkpatrick A. et al . Results from the international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: recommendations.  Intensive Care Medicine. 2007;  33 951-962
  • 52 De Waele JJ, Hoste E, Malbrain ML. Decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome – a critical analysis.  Crit Care. 2006;  10 51
  • 53 Miller M, Michell WL. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome.  SAJCC. 2007;  23 17-23
  • 54 Greenhalgh DG, Warden GD. The importance of intra-abdominal pressure measurements in burned children.  J Trauma. 1994;  36 685-690
  • 55 Hershberger RC, Hunt JL, Arnoldo BD. et al . Abdominal compartment syndrome in the severely burned patient.  J Burn Care Res. 2007;  28 708-714

Correspondence

Dr. Alan David Rogers

Department of Paediatric Surgery

Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital

Klipfontein Road

Rondebosch

7700 Cape Town

South Africa

Phone: 00/27/ 83/ 54 76109

Fax: 00/27/21/797 / 0057

Email: rogersadr@gmail.com

    >