Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19(6): 384-387
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1241172
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Novel Technique of Sutureless Colorectal Anastomosis by Bipolar Coagulation

A. Aslan1 , O. Elpek2
  • 1Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Pediatric Surgery, Antalya, Turkey
  • 2Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Pathology, Antalya, Turkey
Further Information

Publication History

received May 20, 2009

accepted after revision July 30, 2009

Publication Date:
28 October 2009 (online)

Abstract

Aim: Aim of the study was to test the safety and efficacy of sutureless colorectal anastomosis using bipolar coagulation.

Material and Methods: Thirty-six Wistar albino rats were used. The rectum just proximal to the peritoneal reflection was transected in 22 rats (Group 1), and the bowel ends were anastomosed or welded end-to-end using bipolar coagulating forceps (Scoville-Greenwood, 60-1765-001, ConMed, USA). Coagulation using 60 milliamperes took one second for each weld. In 14 rats (Group 2), bowel anastomosis was carried out by hand-sewn sutures. The animals were followed up for general condition and body weight, and were sacrificed at six weeks. The anastomoses were studied with regard to burst pressure, stenosis and histopathology.

Results: All rats survived, and body weight gain was significant (p<0.01 for Group 1, p<0.05 for Group 2). There were no intraabdominal complications (leakage, obstruction, etc.), except in one rat (in Group 2), who had intraabdominal abscess. Although intraluminal pressure was increased to 40 cm H2O with extensive stretching of the colorectal segment, the anastomoses did not burst or open in either the sutureless or sutured groups. The bowel diameter 1 cm distal and 1 cm proximal to the anastomoses did not show any difference between both groups. Neomucosa completely covered 78% of sutured anastomoses and 36% of sutureless anastomoses (p<0.05). Inflammation developed in 78% of sutured anastomoses and 36% of sutureless anastomoses (p<0.05). Edema, giant cell and mast cell infiltration were equivalent in both anastomoses. Lymphoid tissue hyperplasia markedly appeared in the sutureless anastomoses (p<0.01).

Conclusion: This simple technique of sutureless colorectal anastomosis may be useful and offer an alternative to other colorectal anastomosis techniques.

References

  • 1 Aslan A, Karaveli C, Elpek O. Laparoscopic appendectomy without clip or ligature. An experimental study.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 2084-2087
  • 2 Capitán Morales LC, Rodríguez Nuñez E, Morales Conde S. et al . Experimental study of sutureless colorectal anastomosis.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;  47 1284-1290
  • 3 Detweiler MB, Kombos JW, Fenton J. Gastrointestinal sutureless anastomosis in pigs using absorbable intraluminal stents, stent placement devices, and fibrin glue – a summary.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999;  384 445-452
  • 4 Halsted WS. Circular suture of the intestine: an experimental study.  Am J Med Sci. 1887;  94 436-461
  • 5 Hausner K. Laser vs. electrosurgery.  Med Electron. 1985;  16 77-78
  • 6 Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Demetriades H. et al . Sutureless colonic anastomosis in the rat: a randomized controlled study.  Tech Coloproctol. 2002;  6 143-146
  • 7 Kawahara M, Kuramoto S, Ryan P. et al . First experimental sutureless laser anastomosis of the large bowel: long-term study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 556-561
  • 8 Khanna S, Khurana S, Vij S. No clip, no ligature laparoscopic appendectomy.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;  14 201-203
  • 9 Kim SH, Choi HJ, Park KJ. et al . Sutureless intestinal anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring: experience of 632 anastomoses in a single institute.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 2127-2132
  • 10 Kirkegaard P, Cristensen AB, Ibsen J. et al . Experimental nonsuture colonic anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1980;  139 233-236
  • 11 Kopelman D, Lelcuk S, Sayfan J. et al . End-to-end compression anastomosis of the rectum: a pig model.  World J Surg. 2007;  31 532-537
  • 12 Lembert A. Mémoire sur l’enteroraphie.  Rep Gen d’Anat et Physiol Path. 1826;  2 100-107
  • 13 Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN. et al . Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;  CD003144 
  • 14 Nudelman I, Fuko V, Morgenstern S. et al . Gastrointestinal anastomosis with the nickel-titanium double ring.  World J Surg. 2000;  24 874-877
  • 15 Nudelman I, Fuko V, Rubin M. et al . A nickel-titanium memory-shape device for colonic anastomosis in laparoscopic surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 1085-1089
  • 16 Ravitch MM, Rivarola A. Entero-anastomosis with an automatic instrument.  Surgery. 1966;  59 270-277
  • 17 Rosati R, Rebuffat C, Pezzuoli G. A new mechanical device for circular compression anastomosis.  Preliminary results of animal and clinical experimentation. Ann Surg. 1988;  207 245-252
  • 18 Seidenberg B, Garrow E, Pinmental R. et al . Studies on the use of plastic adhesive in gastrointestinal surgery.  Ann Surg. 1963;  158 721-725
  • 19 Uroskie TW, Swank M, Wolferth CC. et al . Effects of isobutyl cyanocrylate tissue adhesive on small bowel anastomosis in puppies.  Am Surg. 1971;  37 397-399

Correspondence

Dr. Adnan Aslan

Akdeniz University School of Medicine

Pediatric Surgery

Akdeniz Universitesi Tip

Fakultesi Cocuk Cerrahisi

07070 Antalya

Turkey

Phone: +90 505 572 35 34

Fax: +90 242 227 44 90

Email: adnanaslan@akdeniz.edu.tr

    >