Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23(01): 063-066
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326952
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Stapled Bowel Anastomoses in Newborn Surgery

Yury Kozlov
1   Department of Newborn Surgery, Pediatric Hospital, Irkutsk, Russian Federation
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Irkutsk State Academy of Medical Continuing Education, Irkutsk, Russian Federation
,
Vladimir Novogilov
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Irkutsk State Academy of Medical Continuing Education, Irkutsk, Russian Federation
,
Alexey Podkamenev
1   Department of Newborn Surgery, Pediatric Hospital, Irkutsk, Russian Federation
,
Irina Weber
1   Department of Newborn Surgery, Pediatric Hospital, Irkutsk, Russian Federation
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 May 2012

18 July 2012

Publication Date:
25 October 2012 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background In this work, we have described our experience with repair of bowel discontinuity by applying stapled anastomosis. The aim of this study was to compare two basic intestinal anastomotic techniques and to establish the feasibility of the stapled connection of bowel in neonates and infants.

Methods Between August 2009 and December 2011, we have performed 23 cases of hand-sewn anastomosis (group I) and 21 cases of mechanical anastomosis (group II) in children during the first 3 months of life. The standard hand technique was typically fashioned by continuous two-layer absorbable suture. A stapled anastomosis was accomplished using the linear endoscopic stapler with 2.5-mm staples (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States). The two groups were compared for patients' demographics, operative report, and postoperative outcomes.

Results There were no differences in the preoperative parameters between the two groups regarding age before surgery, and body weight at operation. The “hand” group and “stapler” group had similar mean preoperative age (19.7 vs. 23.2 days; p = 0.096) and average weight (2884.3 vs. 2716.0 g; p = 0.692). The mean operative time for bowel continuity restoration in group I was 77.4 minutes. In contrast, the mean duration of the operation in the group II was 56.4 minutes. The differences between groups were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The mean time of full enteral feeding for patients with mechanical anastomosis was isochronous for patients with standard hand-sewn technique (6.7 vs. 6.7 days; p = 0.926). The statistically identical postoperative hospital stay was registered in patients of both groups (13.3 vs. 14.1 days; p = 0.852). The postoperative course was uneventful in all the patients. All the anastomoses were fully functional at the end of the study.

Conclusion Efficacy of the stapled anastomosis was confirmed by the shorter time of operation with saving of equal time of full enteral feeding and hospitalization.

Keywords

stapled intestinal anastomosis - newborn - children
 

  • References

  • 1 Powell RW. Stapled intestinal anastomosis in neonates and infants: use of the endoscopic intestinal stapler. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30 (2) 195-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wrighton L, Curtis JL, Gollin G. Stapled intestinal anastomoses in infants. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (12) 2231-2234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mitchell IC, Barber R, Fischer AC, Schindel DT. Experience performing 64 consecutive stapled intestinal anastomoses in small children and infants. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (1) 128-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, Brady R, Vroegop T, Serveld M. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg 2004; 14 (10) 1290-1298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chassin JL, Rifkind KM, Sussman B , et al. The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis. Ann Surg 1978; 188 (5) 689-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG , et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (9) CD004320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Handsewn versus stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41 (2) 180-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Talbert JL, Seashore JH, Ravitch MM. Evaluation of a modified Duhamel operation for correction of Hirschsprung's disease. Ann Surg 1974; 179 (5) 671-675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Olguner M, Akgür FM, Uçan B, Aktuğ T. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children performed using single endoscopic GIA stapler for both mesoappendix and base of appendix. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (9) 1347-1349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Valla JS, Steyaert H, Leculée R, Pebeyre B, Jordana F. Meckel's diverticulum and laparoscopy of children. What's new?. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1998; 8 (1) 26-28
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Javid PJ, Kim HB, Duggan CP, Jaksic T. Serial transverse enteroplasty is associated with successful short-term outcomes in infants with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (6) 1019-1023 , discussion 1023–1024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Simmons JD, Gunter III JW, Manley JD, Sawaya DE, Blewett CJ. Stapled intestinal anastomosis in neonates: validation of safety and efficacy. Am Surg 2010; 76 (6) 644-646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jackson CC, Bettolli MM, De Carli CF, Bass J, Rubin SZ, Sweeney B. Beware of stapled side-to-side bowel anastomoses in small children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2007; 17 (6) 426-427
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Astafiev GV. Investigation process relating to tissue compression in suturing and stapling apparatus. Surgical Staplers (Chirurgiceskiye Shivayushiye Apparaty) 1967; 22-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar