Current Status of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Nation Wide Survey in Germany

Abstract

Introduction Management of appendicitis in children has changed remarkably over the last decade. The proven benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) over the open operation have made LA increasingly popular for pediatric patients. To date, no national clinical practice guideline is available for pediatric LA in Germany and the operation is not standardized. Thus, the aim of our study was to evaluate the current status of pediatric LA in Germany.

Materials and Methods An internet-based survey was conducted on pediatric LA among all 98 registered pediatric surgical units in Germany, comprising 22 questions with regard to utilization and subjective appraisal of LA, technical standards, perioperative treatment, and training aspects.

Results The survey was completed by 71 of the 98 units (72%). Technical infrastructure for LA was provided in all units, but only in 79% of the units was LA, the standard approach for appendectomy. Overall quality of LA was rated better compared with open appendectomy by 52% units, equivalent by 38% and worse by 3%. The three-port technique was used by 90% of the units; 10% used a single-port approach. Dissection of the mesoappendix was done with bipolar coagulation in 55%, monopolar coagulation in 24%, harmonic knife in 6%, and endostaplers in 11% of the units. Closure of the appendiceal stump was performed using endoloops in 57%, ligations in 3%, endostaplers in 39%, and harmonic knife in 1%. Removal of the appendix was done through the port by 79%, using a retrieval bag by 18%, whereas in 3% it was removed directly through laparotomy. In case of appendiceal perforation, an intra-abdominal drain was placed in 65%. Perioperative antibiotic treatment for nonperforated appendicitis was given as a single shot in 33% of the units, for 24 hours in 17%, for 3 days in 39%, and for 5 to 7 days in 11%. LA was performed by a trainee under supervision in 87%, by a board approved pediatric surgeon in 2%, by an attending pediatric surgeon in 7%, and by the surgeon-in-chief in 4% of the units. For 93% of the sample, LA was an essential part of pediatric surgical training.

Conclusion LA is the favored surgical method for pediatric appendectomy in Germany. However, technical details, perioperative therapy and implementation into training programs remain inconsistent. An effort has to be made to establish national clinical practice guidelines to achieve standardization of LA.

Keywords

appendicitis - appendectomy - laparoscopy - children - clinical practice guidelines

• References

• 1 Dingemann J, Ure B. Imaging and the use of scores for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (3) 195-200
• 2 Morrow SE, Newman KD. Current management of appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2007; 16 (1) 34-40
• 3 Holcomb III GW. What's New in Appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (3) 183
• 4 Dingemann J, Kuebler JF, Ure BM. Laparoscopic and computer-assisted surgery in children. Scand J Surg 2011; 100 (4) 236-242
• 5 Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP , et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2006; 243 (1) 17-27
• 6 Saha N, Saha DK, Rahman MA, Islam MK, Aziz MA. Comparison of post operative morbidity between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. Mymensingh Med J 2010; 19 (3) 348-352
• 7 Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K. Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 2001; 88 (4) 510-514
• 8 Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K, Valtonen H, Mattila M, Eskelinen M. The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158 (1) 34-37
• 9 Khalil J, Muqim R, Rafique M, Khan M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2011; 17 (4) 236-240
• 10 Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR. Laparoscopic appendectomy: An unnecessary and expensive procedure in children?. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (3) 310-317
• 11 IPEG Standard and Safety Committee. IPEG guidelines for appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009; 19 (1) vii-ix
• 12 Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983; 15 (2) 59-64
• 13 Iqbal CW, Ostlie DJ. The minimally invasive approach to appendectomy: is less better?. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (3) 201-206
• 14 Valla JS, Limonne B, Valla V , et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1 (3) 166-172
• 15 el Ghoneimi A, Valla JS, Limonne B , et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 1,379 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29 (6) 786-789
• 16 Lobe TE. Laparoscopic surgery in children. Curr Probl Surg 1998; 35 (10) 859-948
• 17 Kellnar S, Trammer A, Till H, Lochbühler H. Endoscopic appendectomy in childhood—technical aspects. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994; 4 (6) 341-343
• 18 Mohsen AA. Endocoagulator control of the mesoappendix for laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994; 4 (6) 435-440
• 19 Holcomb III GW, St Peter SD. Current management of complicated appendicitis in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (3) 207-212
• 20 Warner BW, Kulick RM, Stoops MM, Mehta S, Stephan M, Kotagal UR. An evidenced-based clinical pathway for acute appendicitis decreases hospital duration and cost. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (9) 1371-1375
• 21 Johnson PA, Chavanu KE, Newman KD. Guiding practice improvements in pediatric surgery using multidisciplinary clinical pathways. Semin Pediatr Surg 2002; 11 (1) 20-24
• 22 Chen C, Botelho C, Cooper A, Hibberd P, Parsons SK. Current practice patterns in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196 (2) 212-221