Thoracoscopic Procedures in Pediatric Surgery: What is the Evidence?
16 May 2013
09 June 2013
12 July 2013 (online)
Introduction Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gained enormous acceptance among pediatric surgeons. However, most studies on advantages of VATS do not reach a high level of evidence. According to a recent classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), studies can be classified into Levels 1 to 5 in order of descending quality. We aimed to identify comparative studies investigating VATS versus open procedures in pediatric surgery and to classify publications according to the CEBM criteria.
Materials and Methods Systematic review of comparative studies were identified using PubMed. Only studies published in English, comparing pediatric VATS with the corresponding open operation were included. End points were advantages and disadvantages of VATS as compared with the open procedure. Levels of evidence were determined using the recent CEBM criteria.
Results A total of 3 meta-analysis (MA) and 18 retrospective comparative studies (RCS) investigating 5 different VATS procedures (repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia [CDH], repair of esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF), lung resection, treatment of pneumothorax, and resection of neuroblastoma) were included in this study. No studies of CEBM Level 1 or Level 2 were identified. All studies were classified as CEBM Level 3. The advantages of VATS were less postoperative pain (CDH repair, EA/TEF repair, and pneumothorax repair), shorter hospital stay (CDH repair, EA/TEF repair, lung resection, and pneumothorax), shorter time of ventilation and lower Pco 2 (CDH repair), shorter duration of chest drain (lung resection), and less blood loss (resection of neuroblastoma). However, disadvantages such as higher recurrence rates (CDH repair), higher Pco 2 (EA/TEF repair), and longer operative times (CDH and EA/TEF repair) were also identified.
Conclusion Only RCS on pediatric VATS are available. Therefore, the best available evidence is Level 3. Randomized controlled trials comparing VATS and the corresponding open procedure are mandatory to obtain the highest possible evidence.
- 1 Blinman T, Ponsky T. Pediatric minimally invasive surgery: laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in infants and children. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (3) 539-549
- 2 Kuebler JF, Ure BM. Minimally invasive surgery in the neonate. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 16 (3) 151-156
- 3 Lawal TA, Gosemann JH, Kuebler JF, Glüer S, Ure BM. Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy improves midterm musculoskeletal status and cosmesis in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (1) 224-228
- 4 Ure B. Enthusiasm, evidence and ethics: the triple E of minimally invasive pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (1) 27-33
- 5 Dingemann J, Ure BM. Systematic Review of Level 1 Evidence for Laparoscopic Pediatric Surgery: Do Our Procedures Comply with the Requirements of Evidence-Based Medicine?. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013;
- 6 OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
- 7 Lansdale N, Alam S, Losty PD, Jesudason EC. Neonatal endosurgical congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2010; 252 (1) 20-26
- 8 Szavay PO, Obermayr F, Maas C, Luenig H, Blumenstock G, Fuchs J. Perioperative outcome of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing open versus minimally invasive surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22 (3) 285-289
- 9 Tsao K, Lally PA, Lally KP. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. Minimally invasive repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (6) 1158-1164
- 10 Gander JW, Fisher JC, Gross ER , et al. Early recurrence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia is higher after thoracoscopic than open repair: a single institutional study. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (7) 1303-1308
- 11 Lao OB, Crouthamel MR, Goldin AB, Sawin RS, Waldhausen JH, Kim SS. Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in infancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20 (3) 271-276
- 12 Cho SD, Krishnaswami S, Mckee JC, Zallen G, Silen ML, Bliss DW. Analysis of 29 consecutive thoracoscopic repairs of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates compared to historical controls. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (1) 80-86 , discussion 86
- 13 Gourlay DM, Cassidy LD, Sato TT, Lal DR, Arca MJ. Beyond feasibility: a comparison of newborns undergoing thoracoscopic and open repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (9) 1702-1707
- 14 Borruto FA, Impellizzeri P, Montalto AS , et al. Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula repair: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (6) 415-419
- 15 Szavay PO, Zundel S, Blumenstock G , et al. Perioperative outcome of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula undergoing open versus thoracoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21 (5) 439-443
- 16 Al Tokhais T, Zamakhshary M, Aldekhayel S , et al. Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistulas: a case-control matched study. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (5) 805-809
- 17 Lugo B, Malhotra A, Guner Y, Nguyen T, Ford H, Nguyen NX. Thoracoscopic versus open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008; 18 (5) 753-756
- 18 Nasr A, Bass J. Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (5) 857-861
- 19 Rahman N, Lakhoo K. Comparison between open and thoracoscopic resection of congenital lung lesions. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (2) 333-336
- 20 Vu LT, Farmer DL, Nobuhara KK, Miniati D, Lee H. Thoracoscopic versus open resection for congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations of the lung. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (1) 35-39
- 21 Diamond IR, Herrera P, Langer JC, Kim PC. Thoracoscopic versus open resection of congenital lung lesions: a case-matched study. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (6) 1057-1061
- 22 Tölg C, Abelin K, Laudenbach V , et al. Open vs thorascopic surgical management of bronchogenic cysts. Surg Endosc 2005; 19 (1) 77-80
- 23 Bratu I, Laberge JM, Flageole H, Bouchard S. Foregut duplications: is there an advantage to thoracoscopic resection?. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (1) 138-141
- 24 Bonnard A, Malbezin S, Ferkdadji L, Luton D, Aigrain Y, de Lagauise P. Pulmonary sequestration children: is the thoracoscopic approach a good option?. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (9) 1364-1367
- 25 Butterworth SA, Blair GK, LeBlanc JG, Skarsgard ED. An open and shut case for early VATS treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in children. Can J Surg 2007; 50 (3) 171-174
- 26 Malek MM, Mollen KP, Kane TD, Shah SR, Irwin C. Thoracic neuroblastoma: a retrospective review of our institutional experience with comparison of the thoracoscopic and open approaches to resection. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (8) 1622-1626
- 27 Petty JK, Bensard DD, Partrick DA, Hendrickson RJ, Albano EA, Karrer FM. Resection of neurogenic tumors in children: is thoracoscopy superior to thoracotomy?. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203 (5) 699-703
- 28 Bishay M, Giacomello L, Retrosi G , et al. Decreased cerebral oxygen saturation during thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia in infants. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (1) 47-51
- 29 Bishay M, Giacomello L, Retrosi G , et al. Hypercapnia and Acidosis During Open and Thoracoscopic Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Esophageal Atresia: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2013; ; [Epub ahead of print]
- 30 Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD. The current state of evidence-based pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (10) 1940-1946
- 31 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312 (7023) 71-72
- 32 Dingemann C, Zoeller C, Ure B. Thoracoscopic repair of oesophageal atresia: results of a selective approach. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (1) 14-18