Midterm Outcome of Transumbilically Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy in Children—A Matched Prospective Study

Abstract

Background Prospective data of transumbilically laparoscopic-assisted appendectomies (TULAA) is absent in the pediatric population. We therefore compared the midterm outcome of TULAA with open (OA) and laparoscopic (LA) appendectomies in children with appendicitis in a matched prospective study.

Methods A total of 20 patients operated with TULAA were matched to 20 cases operated by LA and OA, respectively, according to sex, age, and histology of the resected appendix. All 60 children were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up visit.

Results The subjective pain level after discharge, the rate of complications, and persistent painful wound as well as the duration of days refraining from school or kindergarten were similar in all three groups. The wound satisfaction was significantly higher in TULAA and LA. Children operated with TULAA had a faster return to full physical activity compared with OA.

Conclusion Our data suggest that TULAA, LA, and OA have a similar outcome 3 months after surgery apart from cosmetic appearance of the wound and return to full physical activity in pediatric patients. Whether parental bias or the increased wound satisfaction act as confounders for early return to full physical activity should be evaluated in larger prospective randomized trials.

Keywords

TULAA - laparoscopic - appendectomy - SILS - appendicitis

• References

• 1 St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D , et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2011; 254 (4) 586-590
• 2 Nicholson T, Tiruchelvam V. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy with intracorporal laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. JSLS 2001; 5 (1) 47-51
• 3 Lima Gde S, Silva AL, Leite RF, Abras GM, Castro EG, Pires LJ. Transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy compared with laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in acute appendicitis. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2012; 25 (1) 2-8
• 4 Perez EA, Piper H, Burkhalter LS, Fischer AC. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children: a randomized control trial of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (4) 1367-1371
• 5 Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P. Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 2013; 257 (3) 413-418
• 6 Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1989; 95 (2, Suppl): 2S-4S
• 7 Nguyen NT, Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Stamos MJ. A single-port technique for laparoscopic extended stapled appendectomy. Surg Innov 2009; 16 (1) 78-81
• 8 Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P. E-NOTES appendectomy versus transvaginal appendectomy: similar cosmetic results but shorter complete recovery?. Surg Endosc 2009; 23 (4) 916-917
• 9 Bergholz R, Krebs T, Klein I, Wenke K, Reinshagen T. Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted versus 3-port laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a case-control study in children. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2013; (in press)
• 10 Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983; 15 (2) 59-64
• 11 Pelosi MA, Pelosi III MA. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med 1992; 37 (7) 588-594
• 12 Kapischke M, Friedrich F, Hedderich J, Schulz T, Caliebe A. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy—quality of life 7 years after surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396 (1) 69-75
• 13 Kouhia ST, Heiskanen JT, Huttunen R, Ahtola HI, Kiviniemi VV, Hakala T. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97 (9) 1395-1400
• 14 Kaplan M, Salman B, Yilmaz TU, Oguz M. A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study. Acta Chir Belg 2009; 109 (3) 356-363
• 15 Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (2) 334-337
• 16 Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Adv Surg 2006; 40: 1-19