Analysis of Sequelae after Pediatric Phalangeal Fractures

Abstract

Introduction The majority of pediatric phalangeal fractures yield excellent results following conservative or operative treatment. However, a certain subset of fractures is associated with long-term sequelae such as osteonecrosis, physeal growth arrest, malunion, and malposition.

Patients and Methods This study summarizes all sequelae following phalangeal fractures treated within a 10-year period (2003–2012). The underlying fractures were analyzed and classified in fractures with extensive soft tissue involvement, fractures involving the joint and adjacent bony parts, neck fractures, fractures complicated by infection and sequelae after simple fractures following inadequate initial treatment.

Results In total, 40 patients (27 males; 13 females) with a mean age of 6.2 years (range, 1–18 years) were treated for sequelae following fractures of the phalanges. Ten patients (6 males; 4 females) developed sequelae (limited range of motion, premature physeal closure) following fractures with extensive soft tissue damage. Thirteen patients presented with sequelae (mostly limited range of motion, premature physeal closure) following fractures involving the joint and adjacent bony parts of the phalanges. Transcondylar and subcondylar neck fractures leading to sequelae were seen in 10 patients. Sequelae consisted of limited range of motion in nine and malposition in six cases. In half of the patients, osteonecrosis (n = 5) and premature physeal closure (n = 5) complicated the clinical course. Three patients with open fractures and four patients with inadequate initial treatment presented with sequelae.

Conclusion Most sequelae of phalangeal fractures are consequences of fracture per se and are therefore fateful. However, the degree and severity of the long-term sequelae can be minimized by a correct and timely treatment.

Keywords

fractures - outcome - finger - children

• References

• 1 Sibert JR, Maddocks GB, Brown BM. Childhood accidents—an endemic of epidemic proportion. Arch Dis Child 1981; 56 (3) 225-227
• 2 Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop 1986; 6 (6) 656-660
• 3 Rennie L, Court-Brown CM, Mok JY, Beattie TF. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury 2007; 38 (8) 913-922
• 4 Singer G, Eberl R, Petnehazy T , et al. Pediatric hand fractures. Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2009; 60: 471-481
• 5 Schalamon J, Dampf S, Singer G , et al. Evaluation of fractures in children and adolescents in a level I trauma center in Austria. J Trauma 2011; 71 (2) E19-E25
• 6 Leclercq C, Korn W. Articular fractures of the fingers in children. Hand Clin 2000; 16 (4) 523-534 , vii
• 7 Cornwall R, Ricchetti ET. Pediatric phalanx fractures: unique challenges and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 445 (445) 146-156
• 8 Cornwall R. Pediatric finger fractures: which ones turn ugly?. J Pediatr Orthop 2012; 32 (Suppl. 01) S25-S31
• 9 Al-Qattan MM. Phalangeal neck fractures with concurrent vascular injury. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (1) 104-109
• 10 Duncan RW, Freeland AE, Jabaley ME, Meydrech EF. Open hand fractures: an analysis of the recovery of active motion and of complications. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (3) 387-394
• 11 Majumder S, Peck F, Watson JS, Lees VC. Lessons learned from the management of complex intra-articular fractures at the base of the middle phalanges of fingers. J Hand Surg [Br] 2003; 28 (6) 559-565
• 12 Pai DR, Thapa M. Musculoskeletal ultrasound of the upper extremity in children. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43 (Suppl. 01) S48-S54
• 13 Al-Qattan MM. Nonunion and avascular necrosis following phalangeal neck fractures in children. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (8) 1269-1274