Eur J Pediatr Surg 2018; 28(06): 484-490
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606844
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Tethered Cord and Anorectal Malformations: A Case Series

Francesca Destro
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
,
Lorena Canazza
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
,
Milena Meroni
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
,
Giorgio Selvaggio
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
,
Cecilia Parazzini
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
,
Laura Valentini
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
,
Giovanna Riccipetitoni
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

26 June 2017

14 August 2017

Publication Date:
25 September 2017 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The clinical manifestation of a stretched low-lying cone (LLC) is represented by the tethered cord syndrome (TCS) with cutaneous, urologic, neurologic, and orthopaedic dysfunctions. TC is frequently found in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). The aim of our article is to report a series of patients affected by LLC and ARMs and evaluate their management and long-term follow-up results.

Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis over a period of 15 years including patients with ARM and TC and excluding those with severe polymalformations. We collected information related to the types of malformations and demographic data. We analyzed their management (perinatal protocol, radiological investigations, surgery, and multidisciplinary follow-up). QOL was assessed through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY).

Results Thirty-three patients among 210 ARM cases had TC (16%). Eleven of them underwent neurosurgery. One patient had retethering; out of 11 patients, 4 remained stable and 6 improved after surgery (UDS normalization and resolution of symptoms). At a mean follow-up of 10 years, four patients were on clean intermittent catheterization and five on the Peristeen transanal irrigation. The majority of patients were defined as 3 (from 1-bad to 5-excellent) for their physical and mental state.

Conclusion The use of MRI is considered to complete the ARM screening in detecting TC. The multidisciplinary approach is crucial and helps in defining the management of patients. In fact, it is not clear how the features of ARM and TC affect each other. The selection of cases for surgery should take into account the critical elements.

 
  • References

  • 1 Selzman AA, Elder JS, Mapstone TB. Urologic consequences of myelodysplasia and other congenital abnormalities of the spinal cord. Urol Clin North Am 1993; 20 (03) 485-504
  • 2 Teo AT, Gan BK, Tung JS, Low Y, Seow WT. Low-lying spinal cord and tethered cord syndrome in children with anorectal malformations. Singapore Med J 2012; 53 (09) 570-576
  • 3 Stathopoulos E, Muehlethaler V, Rais M. , et al. Preoperative assessment of neurovesical function in children with anorectal malformation: association with vertebral and spinal malformations. J Urol 2012; 188 (03) 943-947
  • 4 Tu A, Steinbok P. Occult tethered cord syndrome: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (09) 1635-1640
  • 5 Suppiej A, Dal Zotto L, Cappellari A. , et al. Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25 (10) 851-855
  • 6 Levitt MA, Patel M, Rodriguez G, Gaylin DS, Pena A. The tethered spinal cord in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (03) 462-468
  • 7 van den Hondel D, Sloots C, de Jong TH, Lequin M, Wijnen R. Screening and treatment of tethered spinal cord in anorectal malformation patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26 (01) 22-28
  • 8 Di Cesare A, Leva E, Macchini F. , et al. Anorectal malformations and neurospinal dysraphism: is this association a major risk for continence?. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26 (11) 1077-1081
  • 9 Totonelli G, Morini F, Catania VD. , et al. Anorectal malformations associated spinal cord anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 2016; 32 (08) 729-735
  • 10 Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A. , et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (10) 1521-1526
  • 11 Levitt MA, Peña A. Management in the Newborn Period. In: Hohlschneider AM, Hustson JM. , eds Anorectal Malformations in Children. Embryology, Diagnosis, Surgical Treatment, Follow-up. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006
  • 12 Pang D. Sacral agenesis and caudal spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 1993; 32 (05) 755-778
  • 13 Dias MS, Pang D. Split cord malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1995; 6 (02) 339-358
  • 14 Pang D. Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality in children, 2 decades later. Neurosurgery 2004; 55 (06) 1325-1342 ; discussion 1342–1343
  • 15 Pang D, Zovickian J, Moes GS. Retained medullary cord in humans: late arrest of secondary neurulation. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (06) 1500-1519
  • 16 Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W. , et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the Standardization Committee of the International Children's Continence Society. J Urol 2014; 191 (06) 1863-1865
  • 17 World Health Organization International classification of functioning, disability and health–children & youth version. 2007 pp.332 Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
  • 18 Mosiello G, Capitanucci ML, Gatti C. , et al. How to investigate neurovesical dysfunction in children with anorectal malformations. J Urol 2003; 170 (4, Pt 2): 1610-1613
  • 19 Kim SM, Chang HK, Lee MJ. , et al. Spinal dysraphism with anorectal malformation: lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 120 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (04) 769-776
  • 20 Tuuha SE, Aziz D, Drake J, Wales P, Kim PC. Is surgery necessary for asymptomatic tethered cord in anorectal malformation patients?. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (05) 773-777
  • 21 Uchida K, Inoue M, Matsubara T. , et al. Evaluation and treatment for spinal cord tethering in patients with anorectal malformations. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2007; 17 (06) 408-411
  • 22 Usami K, Lallemant P, Roujeau T. , et al. Spinal lipoma of the filum terminale: review of 174 consecutive patients. Childs Nerv Syst 2016; 32 (07) 1265-1272
  • 23 Kyrklund K, Pakarinen MP, Taskinen S, Kivisaari R, Rintala RJ. Spinal cord anomalies in patients with anorectal malformations without severe sacral abnormalities or meningomyelocele: outcomes after expectant, conservative management. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 25 (06) 782-789
  • 24 Borg H, Holmdahl G, Olsson I, Wiklund LM, Sillén U. Impact of spinal cord malformation on bladder function in children with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (09) 1778-1785
  • 25 Severino M, Manara R, Faggin R, Dalle Nogare C, Gamba P, Midrio P. Anorectal malformation and spinal dysraphism: the value of diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting associated intradural (epi)dermoid cyst. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (10) 1935-1938
  • 26 Vega-P JM, Pascual LA, Navarro RA. Neurovesical dysfunction in children with anorectal malformations and normal spine. Abstract presented to American Academy of Pediatrics, Section of Urology, 2001
  • 27 Taskinen S, Valanne L, Rintala R. Effect of spinal cord abnormalities on the function of the lower urinary tract in patients with anorectal abnormalities. J Urol 2002; 168 (03) 1147-1149
  • 28 Bui CJ, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ. Tethered cord syndrome in children: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2007; 23 (02) E2